9-11, give me a break.

[Arkilogue]

Then you have not been paying attention in this thread.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxG4lYyi...e=youtu.be

*YAWN*

Go back to sleep.

[Silver]

Go back to sleep.

If only you would. What have you contributed here?

[Arkilogue]

When in Rome.

I don't know...based on your posting history I think you're kind of the culprit.

Who did I accuse of being insane, schizophrenic, on LSD, and repeatedly mock, etc, etc, etc?

Oh right! That was my welcome wagon!


Don't worry Losty, I can take it...I can also dish it out. I return like for like and I can turn back around on a dime, in fact most all of my snap backs are with humor....which obviously some people don't have.

[Thumpalumpacus]

There's that word "proven" again. Did you look at that video?

[Arkilogue]

There's that word "proven" again. Did you look at that video?

Questioner: "On a scale of 1-100 how probable is it that this building was taken down by fire."

Forensic Structural Engineer Dr. Leroy Hulsey: "Zero."

"I can't tell you what did bring down the building, but I can tell you what didn't."


Did you?

[Thumpalumpacus]

Yep. And I've worked inside burning buildings. How 'bout you?

[Faith No More]

Your incredulity is adorable!

But your inability to even consider that a government would attack itself to lay false blame and further their military agenda is extremely naive and dangerous, as the they have, repeatedly. You think the second Gulf of Tonkin accident happened? Not according to historians but lord know's everyone was rip roarin to go to war. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/15/world/...4&emc=eta1


I'll make it real simple for you. Fire did not bring the tower down. Proven. The NIST model omits an obscene amount of data. Proven. The NIST's official model shows deformations that did not occur in real life. Proven.

They should be fired for GROSS negligence.

Next are coming the scientific test to determine exactly what did bring down Building 7 and we'll see won't we?

My incredulity? You're the one that believes that the government orchestrated a false flag attack based on nothing more than some physicists disagree what it would take to bring down one tower. You're the one that believes that the government is so powerful and smart that they could pull off a massive coordination without leaving a single incriminating document or having a whistleblower speak up, but they weren't smart enough to make the demolition appear consistent with the laws of physics. You're the one that believes the government was able to wire three massive buildings with explosives without a single person raising the alarm, but again, they weren't quite smart enough to make it look realistic even though it would most certainly be filmed on live television. You're the one having to cope with the cognitive dissonance it takes to believe the government is all-powerful and intelligent while simultaneously being grossly incompetent.

[Arkilogue]

Yep. And I've worked inside burning buildings. How 'bout you?

How many were burning skyscapers? And how many of them fell straight down for 2.25 seconds of free fall directly into their own foot print with all steel frame connections dismantled?

You should be able to check the accuracy of the NIST's computer modeling, right?

And are you a professor of physic specializing in the fusion of metals? Because this guy is... http://www.911hardfacts.com/report_07.htm

Dr. Steven Jones, Professor of Physics at BYU who specializes in the fusion of metals, has comprehensively and scientifically debunked the possibility of Building 7 collapsing due to fire (or the minor damage to the building's façade from the falling debris of the North Tower). A video and transcript of his detailed lecture arguing controlled demolition as cause for collapse can be downloaded here. Or his power-point presentation with audio can be downloaded here

[Arkilogue]

Your incredulity is adorable!

But your inability to even consider that a government would attack itself to lay false blame and further their military agenda is extremely naive and dangerous, as the they have, repeatedly. You think the second Gulf of Tonkin accident happened? Not according to historians but lord know's everyone was rip roarin to go to war. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/15/world/...4&emc=eta1


I'll make it real simple for you. Fire did not bring the tower down. Proven. The NIST model omits an obscene amount of data. Proven. The NIST's official model shows deformations that did not occur in real life. Proven.

They should be fired for GROSS negligence.

Next are coming the scientific test to determine exactly what did bring down Building 7 and we'll see won't we?

My incredulity?  You're the one that believes that the government orchestrated a false flag attack based on nothing more than some physicists disagree what it would take to bring down one tower.  You're the one that believes that the government is so powerful and smart that they could pull off a massive coordination without leaving a single incriminating document or having a whistleblower speak up, but they weren't smart enough to make the demolition appear consistent with the laws of physics.  You're the one that believes the government was able to wire three massive buildings with explosives without a single person raising the alarm, but again, they weren't quite smart enough to make it look realistic even though it would most certainly be filmed on live television.  You're the one having to cope with the cognitive dissonance it takes to believe the government is all-powerful and intelligent while simultaneously being grossly incompetent.

You can't even fathom the possibility can you...it's just too frightening.

3 buildings fall directly into the path of most resistance having burned a couple floors for about 2 hours....and only 2 of them were hit by planes they were specifically designed to withstand. Never happened before or since.



On the contrary, 9/11 was a resounding success. Just look at the yearly trauma fest and the state of the middle east now. Remember, because of 9/11 you are in a completely different era of civilization, the era of terror! Remember that...remember that...remember that. If you can't see the blatant path of propaganda, you don't know history.

[Mr Greene]

I'm curious.    Do the British memorialize the Somme?

Yes we do.

Somme 100 memmorial