Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 6, 2016 at 7:21 am
(This post was last modified: November 6, 2016 at 7:22 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 6, 2016 at 7:20 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: If you believe something is probable you believe it more than not believe it. You're a theist.
You do have beliefs. You believe you're right, for starters. But you're wrong.
Are you mentally ill?
One needs not BELIEF in the OBSERVATION of PROBABILITIES.
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 6, 2016 at 7:22 am
Yes I probably am mentally ill but I'm less of an idiot than you are.
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 6, 2016 at 7:26 am
(November 6, 2016 at 6:59 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: Intelligent life inevitably develops AI and/or gains the ability to create simulated universes, these "gods" create simulated realities which inevitably produce intelligent life, which evolves to the point of "godhood" and it can run simulations, so on and forth. That's all he's saying. That and some crap about some other crap, I don't know I don't care.
Already explained to him that running the Matrix only makes you 'god' in a figurative sense, and only in relative comparison. Whole thing seemed to pass him by without notice so I lost interest.
Either a troll or a moron. Sickly discolouration in the font lends to the former.
Your commentary is nonsense.
Simplification:
Tradition (theistic deity definition) contains (on the horizon of scientifically observable probabilities/statistics) non-evidentproperties (ie: omniscience, omnipotence)
In contrast, the definition (as observed in the original post) reduces traditional deity-bound properties, abound scientifically observable probabilities/statistics, such that a particular property is evident - thusly the ability to forge non-trivial intelligence, and thereafter, said intelligence shall likely exceed the net intelligence of the creator's(s') species...whilst separately theist-theorized properties [omniscience, omnipotence etc] likely shan't obtain, particularly on the horizon of aforesaid observable probabilities/statistics.)
Thusly, God is properly statistically definable, as observed amidst the original post. (Only the theistic mind adheres to the concept of omniscient, omnipotent deities)
Posts: 2292
Threads: 16
Joined: September 28, 2015
Reputation:
24
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 6, 2016 at 7:26 am
(November 6, 2016 at 7:21 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: One needs not BELIEF in the OBSERVATION of PROBABILITIES.
You're overlooking a glaring contradiction.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 6, 2016 at 7:27 am
Just because you're shitting over the forum colorfully doesn't mean you're not shitting over the forum.
Posts: 9479
Threads: 116
Joined: July 5, 2015
Reputation:
23
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 6, 2016 at 7:28 am
Jordan lay off the weed
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 6, 2016 at 7:28 am
(This post was last modified: November 6, 2016 at 7:29 am by Edwardo Piet.)
Seems more like shrooms to me.
I mean, look a the colors. He's seeing that shit.
In fact his shrooms are so powerful it's exploding out of his mind and we're seeing it ourselves
Jordan Shroom God?
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 6, 2016 at 7:31 am
(This post was last modified: November 6, 2016 at 7:45 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 6, 2016 at 6:06 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: I get it.
He's been reading what Elon Musk said about computer simulation, if you remember we thrashed this out a while back.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=elo...&FORM=VIRE
The universe simulation hypothesis (particularly relating to our universe) is the least relevant scenario mentioned. (As seen in solely ONE god-tier, #3)
Primarily, A God bound entity likely has the ability to create non-trivial intelligence (The most complex constructs in the known universe - human level, and likely beyond)
Thereafter, on Moore's Law etc, we are likely on the horizon of creating such non-trivial intelligence.
(NOTE: Brain based models already exceed/equal humans on non trivial cognitive tasks, ranging from language translation to disease diagnosis)
Posts: 28270
Threads: 522
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 6, 2016 at 7:32 am
Am I the only one who is getting a twisted Deepak Chopra feel from this guy?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 6, 2016 at 7:33 am
(November 6, 2016 at 7:26 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: (November 6, 2016 at 7:21 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: One needs not BELIEF in the OBSERVATION of PROBABILITIES.
You're overlooking a glaring contradiction.
Specify such a contradiction.
|