Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)

[brewer]

Big fish/little pond synd?

Not even a big fish. His fragile ego means that he needs to believe that he's good at the subject but he doesn't actually understand much about it. I saw a lot of this on my Comp Sci degree as an undergrad. Young men would be boasting about how they got drunk and then went back and programmed something in C++.

No. I didn't understand it either.

I saw it a lot when I lived in the caribbean. It's got this unfounded macho twist.

[Edwardo Piet]

Just got done reading the first couple pages of this thread and...what the fuck did I just read?

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

Big fish/little pond synd?

Not even a big fish. His fragile ego means that he needs to believe that he's good at the subject but he doesn't actually understand much about it. I saw a lot of this on my Comp Sci degree as an undergrad. Young men would be boasting about how they got drunk and then went back and programmed something in C++.

No. I didn't understand it either.

EGOISM is but irrelevant. (..for I simply state statistics).

LEMMA OF MINE:

(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particular abound Trigonometric Integration]


(1) I have composed non trivial models, SAMPLE: (utilizing residual neural network) for heart irregularity detection. (Deriving 76/500+ via international kaggle scale) {{See '
EJECTION-FRACTION-IRREGULARITY-DETECTION-MODEL.'}}

(2) A.... n fold orthographic quasicrystal-structured neural network scan behaviour pattern routine that manifests as a new type of tri dimensional artificial intelligence scan behaviour algorithm. {{See 'MORPHING-SOMATIC-QUASICRYSTAL-NEURAL-NETWORK'}}


(3) Hypothesis/Initial Implementation of non trivial general neural fabric, {{on the horizon of deep reinforcement learning, mathematics qua quatum computing, and causal learning (uetorch tower blocks)}} See 'THOUGHT CURVATURE'.

[I_am_not_mafia]

Not even a big fish. His fragile ego means that he needs to believe that he's good at the subject but he doesn't actually understand much about it. I saw a lot of this on my Comp Sci degree as an undergrad. Young men would be boasting about how they got drunk and then went back and programmed something in C++.

No. I didn't understand it either.

I saw it a lot when I lived in the caribbean. It's got this unfounded macho twist.

Yeah! It's somehow definitely tied in with this sense of machismo. Like doing battle via geekery.

It kind of reminds me of this:

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

I saw it a lot when I lived in the caribbean. It's got this unfounded macho twist.

Yeah! It's somehow definitely tied in with this sense of machismo. Like doing battle via geekery.

It kind of reminds me of this:

EGOISM is but irrelevant. (..for I simply state statistics).

LEMMA OF MINE:

(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particular abound Trigonometric Integration]


(1) I have composed non trivial models, SAMPLE: (utilizing residual neural network) for heart irregularity detection. (Deriving 76/500+ via international kaggle scale) {{See '
EJECTION-FRACTION-IRREGULARITY-DETECTION-MODEL.'}}

(2) A.... n fold orthographic quasicrystal-structured neural network scan behaviour pattern routine that manifests as a new type of tri dimensional artificial intelligence scan behaviour algorithm. {{See 'MORPHING-SOMATIC-QUASICRYSTAL-NEURAL-NETWORK'}}


(3) Hypothesis/Initial Implementation of non trivial general neural fabric, {{on the horizon of deep reinforcement learning, mathematics qua quatum computing, and causal learning (uetorch tower blocks)}} See 'THOUGHT CURVATURE'.

[brewer]

Yeah, not an insecurity driven response at all. 

I should probably indicate that this is sarcasm. You may not understand.

[I_am_not_mafia]

Hehehe have you noticed how more of the text is reaching maximum size

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

Hehehe have you noticed how more of the text is reaching maximum size 

Albeit:

EGOISM is but irrelevant. (..for I simply state statistics).

LEMMA OF MINE:

(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particular abound Trigonometric Integration]


(1) I have composed non trivial models, SAMPLE: (utilizing residual neural network) for heart irregularity detection. (Deriving 76/500+ via international kaggle scale) {{See '
EJECTION-FRACTION-IRREGULARITY-DETECTION-MODEL.'}}

(2) A.... n fold orthographic quasicrystal-structured neural network scan behaviour pattern routine that manifests as a new type of tri dimensional artificial intelligence scan behaviour algorithm. {{See 'MORPHING-SOMATIC-QUASICRYSTAL-NEURAL-NETWORK'}}


(3) Hypothesis/Initial Implementation of non trivial general neural fabric, {{on the horizon of deep reinforcement learning, mathematics qua quatum computing, and causal learning (uetorch tower blocks)}} See 'THOUGHT CURVATURE'.



Query:
Mathilda, perhaps it is exigent that you express your most profound lemma.

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

An erratum of mine:

INITIAL STATEMENT:
(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particular abound Trigonometric Integration]

ERRATUM:
(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particularly abound Trigonometric Integration]

---

THEIST likely accurately describes your religious stance, on observation of your irrelevant, nonsensical anecdotes...

Oh, ouch. And actually, based on what I and others can see in your behavior, (user name, flamboyance, attention seeking, dismissing what you can't defend) you appear to be the prototypical ego maniac with an inferiority complex. 

I could have been wrong. More like little fish/little pond synd.

Invalid.

I had, four years prior, naively (albeit logically) axiomatized consciousness, amidst an equation. See "Consciencia_Aequatio".

Therein, for any computational system observed, there exists some non-polynomially computable function [on planck-einsteinian relation].

Thereafter, existence is uniformly distributed at the boundary of said asymptote; therein, asymptotical indifference (amidst existence's constituents) persists.

As such, inferiority is but inconsequential/asymptotically inexistent.

[brewer]

Sorry, didn't read a word. And won't while you keep up the text manipulation attention seeking behavior.

Have you reached critical mass?