Your thoughts on the protests

[Amarok]

Listen, dipshit. You were attributing the attack to him being a supporter of Trump. You said it had partly to do with him having a Trump sticker, and you kudosed EP for his post implying that you had the mistaken belief that the attack was at least partly to do with Trump.

But from what reports of the police show according to snopes, the attack didn't start because of him being a Trump supporter. In fact, if you listen to the lady, she sounded surprised that he turned out to be a Trump supporter. Furthermore, there is nothing to indicate that these were Hillary supporters who attacked him (and yes, you didn't say they were, but this is to make it clear for others).

And no you don't want to make up your own story when it comes to judging the context of certain situations, you always need to check various sources first before you jump to hasty conclusions. This is a sign of using your brain the right way, and not a sign of weakness. But then again, I don't expect much from a sad moron like you.

Good glob..

NOW READ THE OTHER 1/2 of what I orginally said!!!

IT STARTED WITH A FENDER BENDER!!!

then the 'Dims' in the other car went Ape Sh*t on the guy. beating the hell out of him and stealing his car. All the while making a video shouting their disdain for his right to vote for trump!!!

This is what's inhearently wrong with you guys. You change fact to fit your own narritive. You want/need me to be arguing the idea that this man was hunted down and targeted because of a sticker.. Again NEVER Said that.

I Said It started with an accident and escilated because he was a trump supporter and the beating according to the woman who recorded it was because of the mans suspected vote!!!

Read what is on page maker of strawmen

To quote snopes article 

While it's clear the man in the video was assaulted, it seems from initial police reports that the assault stemmed from a traffic incident. Bystanders are heard taunting him for voting for Trump, but it's not clear from the video itself or the statements from police whether he did in fact say he voted for Trump, and if he did, whether that was the impetus for the attack.

So no the facts don't agree with your narrative  there is no evidence he was attack because he supported trump and of course there is zero evidence he is even a trump supporter  

It's also not clear, as some publications are claiming, that the battery suspects in the video were supporters of Trump's Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton. One woman can be heard off camera asking, "Are you gonna pay for my shit?" which seems to align with the police statement that the fight stemmed from a traffic accident resulting in property damage.

The narrative clearly shows he was taunted for voting for trump but there is no evidence the beating was for supporting trump and there is again no evidence for the attackers being Hilary supporters 

So one wonders what this is suppose to prove that a traffic accident lead to a fight and some people (who,s politics we don't know) while some people insulted him for supporting a person we have no evidence he even supports and on top off all that we have no idea if the motivation for the taunting and the assault were the same (because of trump)

[Drich]

If you ascribe the taunt to being a trump supporter than by all rights you must ascribe the content of the taunt as well.. meaning: "Yeah, ugh.. Dat's right dats what you get for voting trump!" right after he was kicked in the face.

Don't be stupid, I already think very low of those who support this kind of thing by trying to split hairs, please, don't add stupidity to my list of charges.