Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 21, 2024, 6:12 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
#61
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
(November 15, 2016 at 8:51 pm)dyresand Wrote:
(November 15, 2016 at 9:53 am)TaraJo Wrote: Since about 2012 or so, the SJW's have been on the rise; the jerks who use progressive sounding, virtuous buzzwords to justify being jerks. 

So you mean regressive leftists because  that's what they literally are.

Yeah, there needs to be a better word for the leftists who, despite obstensively supporting left-wing causes, have rhetoric and style that seems to come straight out of the far-right's handbook, particularly when they end up using that same logic to reach conclusions identical to the far-right, like this little incident, or Azaelia Banks supporting Trump specifically because he's "evil" (her words, not mine, surprisingly enough) and Hilary Clinton talks down too much to minorities.

It's like some people are too concerned about wolves in sheep's clothing that they have decided they have no choice but to accept the wolf for what it is. Fortunately, they have less power than their alt-right counterpoints, but are probably far more annoying, especially to the more sane leftists.

The term "SJW" (and to a lesser extent, regressive left) has been poisoned far beyond the point of salvagability. There needs to be a term for those sort of Jackasses that, hopefully, the right-wingers won't poison. Sadly, the best thing I can think of is "Reactionary Left," because that actually fits their tone (and to a lesser extent, their content) better.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.

[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]

I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Reply
#62
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
The days of SJWs bullying everyone and throwing around their buzzwords are over.
Reply
#63
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
(November 15, 2016 at 9:15 pm)KUSA Wrote:
(November 15, 2016 at 1:59 pm)Minimalist Wrote: If they did they fucked themselves but good.

They? I hate to tell you this but you are part of them.

Hey, I voted Heinrich.
Reply
#64
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
I am on another forum with many SJW's on it, and when I tried to propose this thought to one of the members (and not rudely, mind you, I was very respectful about it), they blew up at me and then demanded I don't use the word "SJW". 

I think far left liberals have, unconsciously or not, good intentions or not, made a habit of vilifying the white male in America. This talk of "privilege" bullshit, of painting all minorities as victims and all but saying that white men are selfish and cannot have problems of their own that even stack up in comparison to a black man, or a woman, has pushed people further from the left. It makes me irritated to be a democrat, and it makes me borderline ashamed of my own generation (I am in my early 20's, and this seems to be the age range most of them fall into).

Edit: that being said, I don't think this was the only factor and I believe if another candidate had won the nomination, the democrats still might have taken the election.
Reply
#65
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
(November 15, 2016 at 11:16 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:
(November 15, 2016 at 8:51 pm)dyresand Wrote: So you mean regressive leftists because  that's what they literally are.

The term "SJW" (and to a lesser extent, regressive left) has been poisoned far beyond the point of salvagability. There needs to be a term for those sort of Jackasses that, hopefully, the right-wingers won't poison. 


I agree with everything you say in your post, but unfortunately I think this is a given. The alt-right is an opportunistic movement that appeals to traditionally centre or left-leaning people by exploiting the weaknesses of the Left. Notice how the alt-right are all about "rights" and "freedoms" and "freedom of speech" these days? In other words, they suddenly love all the principles that were fought for by The Left against the Right over the past few centuries. They can do that to appeal to traditional Leftists because they know The contemporary Left has dropped those crusades and it's not sitting well with a lot of people.

And yes, that extends to terms used to criticise the Left too. Any time we as leftists introduce a term to self-criticise, they'll appropriate it, take it out of context and over-use it to exploit.

I think the only way to soften the effect of that is to maintain a simultaneous criticism of the alt-right while we have these discussions about "regressive leftism" among ourselves, reclaim the terms. Call out the alt-right for what they are, opportunists, get more people to see that and their tactics should stop working. We need a strong centre-political voice, which is opposed to both "regressive Leftism" but also doesn't leave the alt-Right un-challenged.
"Adulthood is like looking both ways before you cross the road, and then getting hit by an airplane"  - sarcasm_only

"Ironically like the nativist far-Right, which despises multiculturalism, but benefits from its ideas of difference to scapegoat the other and to promote its own white identity politics; these postmodernists, leftists, feminists and liberals also use multiculturalism, to side with the oppressor, by demanding respect and tolerance for oppression characterised as 'difference', no matter how intolerable."
- Maryam Namazie

Reply
#66
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
(November 15, 2016 at 11:17 pm)Bella Morte Wrote: The days of SJWs bullying everyone and throwing around their buzzwords are over.

I hope you're right, but judging from what I've seen from Huffington Post and a host of other left-leaning sites, there's no sign of them letting up right now.  I mean, hell, the left is using safety pins as a sign of support towards minorities feeling threatened by the prospect of a Trump presidency and a whole host of left leaning sites are chastising white people for trying to show that support.  Maybe they'll learn their lesson when they get to see what REAL oppression is like.  Unfortunately, with Republicans in charge of the white house, both houses of congress and the supreme court, they're going to learn it very quickly; and it's going to be ugly for everyone.

I feel like SJW's or the regressive left or whatever you want to call them, they're the left wing equalivant of the tea party: ridiculous reactionaries who make the rest of their party look bad by comparison.  Maybe the democratic elected officials need to deal with the SJW's the same way the Republicans dealt with the tea party.
I live on facebook. Come see me there. http://www.facebook.com/tara.rizzatto

"If you cling to something as the absolute truth and you are caught in it, when the truth comes in person to knock on your door you will refuse to let it in." ~ Siddhartha Gautama
Reply
#67
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
It cracks me up that I get called an SJW. I stand against bigotry wherever I see it, but PC isn't my style.

It ain't my circus ... ain't my monkeys. But slapping a pejorative label on me is not going to shut me up when I see bullshit.

Reply
#68
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
(November 16, 2016 at 12:52 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: It cracks me up that I get called an SJW. I stand against bigotry wherever I see it, but PC isn't my style.

It ain't my circus ... ain't my monkeys. But slapping a pejorative label on me is not going to shut me up when I see bullshit.

You're such an SJW!

Tongue
Reply
#69
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
(November 15, 2016 at 9:53 am)TaraJo Wrote: I can't help but look at the election results and think, in hindsight, I can't be too surprised.  

Since about 2012 or so, the SJW's have been on the rise; the jerks who use progressive sounding, virtuous buzzwords to justify being jerks.  Before, they were always on the fringe for everyone to laugh at their absurdity.  You can go to Tumblr and find them all over the place and they're increasingly getting more influential on twitter.  But lately, they've been getting more noticed, especially on college campuses.  

It feels like suicide for the democrats and even for the reasonable republicans.  I mean, seriously: white people, like it or not, are the majority here, but in this election cycle, these people turned "white male" into an insult in the name of progressivism.  I don't know how they think a democracy works, but you don't win elections by insulting the majority.  Not to mention, there's the boy-who-cried-wolf effect: we've gotten so used to bratty college kids calling everything racism that when Trump is saying or doing things that are genuinely racist, we ignore it.  Racism is a term that's so over-used that it lost its meaning, opening the doors for legitimate, serious racism.

And the kicker?  Hillary focused on them but ignored the rust belt states that used to be the backbone of the democratic party.  Yeah, the middle class factory workers in Ohio, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.  Their jobs are suddenly being outsourced to Asian sweatshops and they aren't exactly trained to work the jobs that are replacing them.  Yet, instead of talking about those issues, progressives are dismissing them because they're "white males."  Instead of listening to their concerns, their worries, their issues, they're being chastised for not memorizing a 19-year-old's ten sylable gender identity that he just came up with last week.  Trump, to his credit, actually showed concern for them, claiming he'll back out of Nafta and bring manufacturing back from China (I don't think he'll actually be able to do either, but at least he's showing concern).  You want to flip this election around, have Hillary address labor issues, manufacturing jobs, things like that, and don't just cater to a bunch of spoiled college kids.

^Exactly what I've tried to say on here.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
#70
Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
(November 16, 2016 at 12:52 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: It cracks me up that I get called an SJW. I stand against bigotry wherever I see it, but PC isn't my style.

It ain't my circus ... ain't my monkeys. But slapping a pejorative label on me is not going to shut me up when I see bullshit.


Anymore you are either a bigot or a sjw. There is no in between.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  2024 US Presidential Election Thumpalumpacus 3055 194195 November 22, 2024 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Social democracy in Europe without 5 minutes Interaktive 1 684 January 3, 2023 at 4:55 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Bacha Bazi: how poor Afghani boys were raped. WinterHold 76 8080 December 29, 2022 at 2:25 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Does Social Issues matter when deciding your political affiliation? T.J. 48 4956 April 21, 2022 at 9:36 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  TX social media censorship bill Fake Messiah 24 2829 September 14, 2021 at 3:15 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Amy Coney Barnett officially confirmed as Supreme Court Justice Rev. Rye 33 3306 October 28, 2020 at 3:01 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Mail in voting/ and election day. Brian37 6 1133 October 25, 2020 at 2:47 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  BREAKING:Trump refuses to commit to a peaceful transition of power after Election Day WinterHold 97 7702 October 2, 2020 at 1:50 am
Last Post: WinterHold
  Justice Obama? BrianSoddingBoru4 33 2458 August 26, 2020 at 5:28 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Social Security and wealth. Brian37 20 1785 July 9, 2020 at 12:18 pm
Last Post: Brian37



Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)