RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
November 18, 2016 at 4:30 am
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 7:54 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
|
|
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
November 30, 2016 at 3:55 pm
(November 17, 2016 at 11:39 am)mh.brewer Wrote:(November 17, 2016 at 11:18 am)Divinity Wrote: No, I think today's politicians have convinced the electorate that they can build an economy on fucking coal. Which is fucking dying whether people fucking like it or not. And it's going away sooner than most people think. People want jobs, but apparently they need to be in coal or manufacturing, because flying zebras forbid that they have jobs that *gasp* might not HAVE to be there. You know... like just about everywhere else. Have you read the EIA World Energy Outlook reports over the last 5 years? Green energy is here. Wind is competitive with coal already and the 4 year forecasts for new installations (which are in planning and siting stages roughly now) all have wind under the price of coal. And boy are markets responding. Generating companies are basically only installing natural gas and wind right now. There's some solar going on due to tax credits and reuse of brownfield sites. Green energy is here, now. And there are very few jobs in them. RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
November 30, 2016 at 5:23 pm
“Understanding is a three edged sword: your side, their side, and the truth.” RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
November 30, 2016 at 5:31 pm
(November 30, 2016 at 3:55 pm)mihoda Wrote:(November 17, 2016 at 11:39 am)mh.brewer Wrote: Build, expand or maintain? The coal economy was built years ago. It's now declining and will continue to decline. So, shut down all coal generated electricity/power today?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
November 30, 2016 at 5:44 pm
(November 30, 2016 at 5:31 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:(November 30, 2016 at 3:55 pm)mihoda Wrote: Have you read the EIA World Energy Outlook reports over the last 5 years? Green energy is here. Wind is competitive with coal already and the 4 year forecasts for new installations (which are in planning and siting stages roughly now) all have wind under the price of coal. I agree that shutting them down today isn't an option. But phasing them out or converting coal to natural gas is doable. Coal miners think the liberal environmentalist took their jobs, but in reallity cheap natural gas put the nail in the coffin for them. “Understanding is a three edged sword: your side, their side, and the truth.” RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
December 1, 2016 at 2:24 am
(This post was last modified: December 1, 2016 at 2:25 am by Bob Kelso.)
(November 30, 2016 at 5:23 pm)Kosh Wrote:*my emphasis*(November 18, 2016 at 4:30 am)Bob Kelso Wrote: So... you'll have your shit and eat it too? They're one in the same Kosh. Bollocks. It's an observed truth. Your personal experiences, or the lack thereof, don't wipe away the reality of the veritable legions of racist, bigoted, cunts, and the equally racist and bigoted tenets that dwell within the SJW communities. I've always been a fan of calling a spade a spade, you'll find no arguments with me there if the spade is indeed a spade and not a pruning shear. What I do have an issue with is hypocrisy and absolute madness, which are admittedly found in every corner of the arena but I think you'll find that there is massive amounts of both within the SJW ideologies. Quote:Political corectnes isn't this vague nebulous hard to understand concept. Treat others as you want to be treated and don't be a jerk. People don't like it when they called out for bad behavior. I love it when they apologize and claim that what we saw isn't the real them. They are just sorry someone noticed. PC in the workplace and otherwise professional areas, I don't have much of an issue with. Perceived "bad" language and actions are bad for business, I get that. On the other hand PC in the public and private domains is being used at it's best as annoying thought/speech policing, and at it's worst as a method to bully and publicly humiliate anyone with an opinion outside of the Borg's strict guidelines. RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
December 1, 2016 at 3:06 am
(This post was last modified: December 1, 2016 at 3:15 am by Homeless Nutter.)
(December 1, 2016 at 2:24 am)Bob Kelso Wrote: [...] On the other hand PC in the public and private domains is being used at it's best as annoying thought/speech policing, and at it's worst as a method to bully and publicly humiliate anyone with an opinion outside of the Borg's strict guidelines. How? What methods exactly, are being used to bully and humiliate those people? Is there some governmental PC police force, that puts them on some sort of register, or otherwise inconveniences them? Some sort of organized apparatus of oppression? Or is it mainly - just some other people (sometimes lots of them) publicly speaking against them, in media and on the internet, or deciding not to do business with them and such? And isn't that also freedom of speech and enterprise? In a society with freedom of speech, if I hold and express unpopular views, I have to be prepared, for quite a lot of people - perhaps the majority of them, if I'm a particularly anti-social a**hole - to have a negative opinion of me and openly speak against me. If I'm not "man enough" to withstand that - maybe I should just keep my trap shut? "Anyone with an opinion outside of the Borg's strict guidelines" needs to stop being triggered by bespectacled fat girls with funny hair on Facebook, seems to me. I was born in a country with actual thought/speech police - you know, the kind that could make you disappear, for saying the wrong thing. This fashionable new narrative of white man's liberties being restricted in the West - especially in USA - makes me laugh, though bitterly...
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
December 1, 2016 at 11:51 am
People have the freedom to be racist assholes and say whatever they want. They just hate the fact that they get called out on it.
By all means.. Go on Facebook and enjoy your free speech. Just don't be surprised when someone calls a spade a spade. “Understanding is a three edged sword: your side, their side, and the truth.” RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
December 1, 2016 at 12:19 pm
Can we change alcoholic to over enthusiastic mixologist?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
December 1, 2016 at 12:21 pm
OP title is the new version of "Women would have it so much better if they would just shut up. They just make the men angry."
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



![[Image: bbb59Ce.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2Fbbb59Ce.gif)