Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article snippet)

[MadaraUchihuh]

Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article snippet)



Why is God scientifically redefinable?

(a) One shall recall that humanity had not always had rigorous modern science.

(b) One shall recall that a root guess that the universe perhaps began/had an origin-source; with respect to creator-styled entity sequences  (the typical archaic claimed God, See any archaic cosmology that encompassed creator-typed god) had been established prior to modern science . (Digital Physics, Simulation Hypothesis, Penrose/Hawking singularity theorems ...) 

(c.i) One shall recall that science updates itself. It appears science "forgot" to update the archaic science of Gods, in modern science terms.

(c.ii)Recall 'gravity'. We are aware that science updated from:
     (1) early gravity ('weighty dignity' year 1509) 
     (2) to later gravity (De Caelo, - mythical aether, non-attractive force), 
     (3) to Newtonian gravity (attractive force, 1687), 
     (4) then to Einsteinian description.

The word 'gravity' maintained regardless.


...
And so, "god" is updatable in modern science terms.



...
Source data:
I see that I can't post urls as yet.
Dm me for source.

[Alex K]

Very subtle, Jordan

[Pat Mustard]

Very subtle, Jordan

Was wondering why he got banned so quickly, then I read his post.

[Alex K]

Could have been much quicker if I hadn't been at work all day

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

I'm always amazed at how easy socks are to spot. You'd think they'd at least make some sort of effort to disguise themselves.

If I were to be banned from this place, i would make sure my sock puppet was significantly less witty, brilliant and erudite, so no one would suspect it was me.

Boru