|
What is logic?
|
 (March 18, 2017 at 10:24 am)ma5t3r0fpupp3t5 Wrote: How many joints does one need to smoke to be able to write all of that? One. About five miles long.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
(March 18, 2017 at 10:27 am)Little Rik Wrote: It may be bizarre to you ma but I start following logic the day that I stop with drugs. Here's to then, then.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Worst . . . OP . . . ever.
I dunno, I had an op several years ago that I could have done without.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
 (March 18, 2017 at 11:55 am)Whateverist Wrote: If ignorance is bliss, this amount of stupid must be fucking nirvana. I have one person on ignore and that is little Rik, I can only imagine what has been written but assume it has very little "logic" in it. You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid. Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.  (March 18, 2017 at 11:55 am)Whateverist Wrote: If ignorance is bliss, this amount of stupid must be fucking nirvana. If ignorance is bliss, Rik is in a fucking coma.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
By looking at the title, I thought this thread would be more about discussing the nature of logic, but apparently not.
Hail Satan!
   (March 20, 2017 at 12:19 am)TheAtheologian Wrote: By looking at the title, I thought this thread would be more about discussing the nature of logic, but apparently not. If you only would have analysed properly my sentence you would have understood that my explanation of logic go hand in hand with what most dictionaries say. Take this explanation from one of the link from Thumpalumacus. It say........... a science that deals with the principles and criteria of validity of inference and demonstration.......and then about inference it say........... something that is inferred; especially : a conclusion or opinion that is formed because of known facts or evidence........ Now read again my sentence in the OP.......it say..........Logic is when the feeling of satisfaction is permanent not temporary. By bringing VALIDITY about known fact then I do fulfill the criteria of logic because it is a known fact that material-physical things are unable to bring permanent satisfaction. I do bring known facts that lead to conclusions therefore I follow logic. All this should have rung a bell in your mind Atheo but if you think it didn't then you got a problem. 
 (March 20, 2017 at 6:04 am)Little Rik Wrote:(March 20, 2017 at 12:19 am)TheAtheologian Wrote: By looking at the title, I thought this thread would be more about discussing the nature of logic, but apparently not. So brainwashing is really just an alternative approach to logic? Interesting. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
