Religion and Science are 1000% Opposite

[Foxaèr]

If you can not give evidence that you are in love (physical or mental) how on hell you expect that someone can give you evidence of a spiritual love that is a lot higher than physical love?

It is only when someone experience that love that the evidence can be given.
By saying that there is no evidence that God exist you automatically play the dumb idiot considering that you never engage in the system that give access to that spiritual love and God evidence.
Dumb like a little boy that doesn't yet understand why two adult people kiss each other and think that they are stupid.  

Irrelevant.

The rest of your post is just the usual nonsense.

[I_am_not_mafia]

If you can not give evidence that you are in love (physical or mental) how on hell you expect that someone can give you evidence of a spiritual love that is a lot higher than physical love?

It is only when someone experience that love that the evidence can be given.

No, there is plenty of evidence of the existence of love. The scientists did not need to experience it themselves to observe it.

The neural basis of romantic love.

The activity in the brains of 17 subjects who were deeply in love was scanned using fMRI, while they viewed pictures of their partners, and compared with the activity produced by viewing pictures of three friends of similar age, sex and duration of friendship as their partners. The activity was restricted to foci in the medial insula and the anterior cingulate cortex and, subcortically, in the caudate nucleus and the putamen, all bilaterally. Deactivations were observed in the posterior cingulate gyrus and in the amygdala and were right-lateralized in the prefrontal, parietal and middle temporal cortices.

Far more evidence exists for love exists than your god.

[Little Rik]

Can you please go back few pages in this thread and see who make the claim that the supernatural is bullshit?

OK well let's not use the word supernatural at all. Makes it even easier to demonstrate that your god does not exist because then it can only be made of matter or energy.

You're the one that is explaining your beliefs by referring to things outside of this universe:

One more silly question Mat.

Once the body die the consciousness take over and separate from the body.
OVER WHERE?
Certainly not in this universal dimension where the law of thermodynamics apply.
Remember that within this universe we have a physical dimension but the consciousness is not physical by nature.
She is abstract therefore she is not bound by the rules and restriction that apply in this physical universe.
Once she leave the dead body then she belong to a different dimension where the physical-mental energy do not belong.
Only once she take a further reincarnation then she will be bound to the rules that apply in this universal dimension once again.

Nor do you understand anything about science:

What a stupid question Mat.
Matter is just one of the factor within this universe that is made of energy-consciousness although is in a latent stage.
Space, air, light and water are the other form of energy within this universe so energy is everywhere and if you are aware enough of how the system works you can access energy 24/7 matter or not matter.

Science believe in evolution so it come natural that a plant will turn into an animal an animal into a human and so on.

So try answering my questions again without referring to the supernatural or alternative dimensions.

Provide evidence because you are the one making the assertions.

If you observe mother nature in action you can see that every living creature always try to find the very best and not only for surviving reason.
Now you are here talking to different people not certainly for survival but in order to get more knowledge.
A climber plant can well survive without moving around but it does move in search of better condition so there will be more prosperity for her.
Darwin evolution only deal with changes in order to survive but both Darwin and atheists don't get the fact that change happen in consciousness not just in the body.
And changes in the consciousness lead to changes in the body that is why plants turn into animals, animals into humans and humans will eventually change into God.
Physical science is called physical for a reason and that is that it can only deal with the physical aspect of the whole essence of what exist.  

[Foxaèr]

Had enough fun this morning. Time to go.

[The Grand Nudger]

Provide a single example of a plant turning into an animal.

Provide a single example of a dog turning into a human.

Provide a single example of a human being turning into a god.

[Little Rik]

If you can not give evidence that you are in love (physical or mental) how on hell you expect that someone can give you evidence of a spiritual love that is a lot higher than physical love?

It is only when someone experience that love that the evidence can be given.

No, there is plenty of evidence of the existence of love. The scientists did not need to experience it themselves to observe it.

The neural basis of romantic love.

The activity in the brains of 17 subjects who were deeply in love was scanned using fMRI, while they viewed pictures of their partners, and compared with the activity produced by viewing pictures of three friends of similar age, sex and duration of friendship as their partners. The activity was restricted to foci in the medial insula and the anterior cingulate cortex and, subcortically, in the caudate nucleus and the putamen, all bilaterally. Deactivations were observed in the posterior cingulate gyrus and in the amygdala and were right-lateralized in the prefrontal, parietal and middle temporal cortices.

Far more evidence exists for love exists than your god.

Sooner or later someone will discover a machine that will tell us that the pineal gland of someone is full of energy and brighter while other pineal glands are low in energy and dark.
An atheist however will not believe that a pineal gland in top condition means that God is there.
No matter what you can invent to study the brain and mind.
Atheists still will not believe anything that will contradict their dogma that God doesn't exist.  

[The Grand Nudger]

You're speaking as if such machines haven't already been invented, as if we haven't already used them, and as if your superstitions haven't already been found to be fatuous.

You're talking about a routinely common endocrine gland as though it were genie when we know that it isn't....and when none of it has a thing to do with gods at all, regardless of the status of their existence.

-and those examples?

[Succubus]

Little Rik
That is bizarre Succu.
You just remind me years ago when I was working in a medical center.
I become close friend with a guy who just became a doctor.
One day during the usual jokes in the staff room he said to me.........WHEN YOU WILL STUDY LIKE ME YOU TOO MAY BECOME A DOCTOR.

Yes I agree, it's entirely possible for a toilet attendant with learning difficulties to make something of themselves. Unfortunately in your case..........

[JackRussell]

Yes, Melatonin does a job LR.

And.....

[Crossless2.0]

Sooner or later someone will discover a machine that will tell us that the pineal gland of someone is full of energy and brighter while other pineal glands are low in energy and dark.
An atheist however will not believe that a pineal gland in top condition means that God is there.
No matter what you can invent to study the brain and mind.
Atheists still will not believe anything that will contradict their dogma that God doesn't exist.  

Discover a machine?