Atheism in control would be bad

[Abaddon_ire]

Alright it seems you already know what I meant even though I didn't elaborate and just want you to relfect. Let us just see which God will stand the test of time, the Atheistic imaginary one where the most thing to be valued is but an imagination originating from nothing, still in essence not having substance where sex and eating pizza states are even considered greater then vision of the God of Abraham, Moses, and Jesus, but those states just pass away and disappear, or humanity will see your polytheistic intentions for what they are, a level of polytheism that not even the worse societies advocated in the past, and I am betting on the everlasting eternal God, sorry, but humans lack patience now because they don't know what they are linked to, but the proof of the true God is with us all, and I prefer him over everyone else.

Justice has to be by true love in a proper vision giving everything it's proper due, and valuing and measuring with regards to how things are, and not just chaotic claim where we love some and hate others ignorantly without true judgment from God.

There is no atheist god.

[Pat Mustard]

Atheism is denial or confusion of a what the word "god" means or is nihilism.

It's good Quran took a snap shot of time of what words meant in a certain time.

Wrong, atheism is looking at the utter lack of evidence for god, and accepting it.

You don't get to give out to us for failing to participate in your delusional fantasy world.

[Abaddon_ire]

Atheism is denial or confusion of a what the word "god" means or is nihilism.

It's good Quran took a snap shot of time of what words meant in a certain time.

And that is just plain weird, now that I consider it.

You are now in the position of claiming that atheists are confused about what the word "god" means, yet also berating atheists for asking what the word "god" means.

Which is it?

[Fidel_Castronaut]

[img]<br />https://pinterest.com/pin/449867450269979432/?source_app=android[/img]

I wonder what that picture was supposed to be?
Probably a favourable comment given my insightful post.

Shit I actually clicked on Chad's Pinterest and, holy hell, it's like the nutjobs pocket image guide to fucknuttery!

[Abaddon_ire]

I wonder what that picture was supposed to be?
Probably a favourable comment given my insightful post.

Shit I actually clicked on Chad's Pinterest and, holy hell, it's like the nutjobs pocket image guide to fucknuttery!

Actually, I recommend that everyone click that. It is an encyclopedia of every wingnut theory ever conceived.

[vulcanlogician]

I wonder what that picture was supposed to be?
Probably a favourable comment given my insightful post.

Shit I actually clicked on Chad's Pinterest and, holy hell, it's like the nutjobs pocket image guide to fucknuttery!

I was actually expecting some over-the-top fucknuttery there. I'm sorely disappointed. Granted, he veers over the median a couple times in the apologetics category, but he has good taste in art.

[Edwardo Piet]

Atheism in control would mean less false hope and less delusional decisions. The latter is definitely a very good thing. Not so sure about the former. Some douches need false hope. Okay a LOT of douches need false hope. Maybe there would be a moral panic if the world was run by non-delusional people because maybe the world isn't ready for rationality yet. . . but even so it may still be worth it because it would at least rid us of delusional morally false beliefs based on superstitious nonsense making governmental and social decisions. Depends how big the moral panic would be. If it happened.