Another argument for God.

[The Grand Nudger]

Then maybe you should leave it up to god, I think that your mouth is just getting in the way.

[drfuzzy]

It is like a beating dead horse, only that, I believe God can revive the dead lands after they dried up, and so perhaps, someone will listen and give ear to reason and light.

Yeah, well as soon as your deity shows up and proves it exists, without help from any human being, it will be worth a minute or two of attention.

[uncool]

1. The brain is very complex.
2. Humans throughout history have not understood the brain.
3. If the brain is the source of morality and goodness,  then most of humans throughout history have not understood how that is even possible given they have not understood the brain.
4. If we don't know it's possible the source of morality and goodness is the brain and naturalism is true (no spirits, no mystic reality, etc), then we aren't justified in belief in morals and morality.
5. If we aren't justified in beliefs in morals and goodness, then goodness is an illusion.
6. Goodness is not an illusion.
- Therefore naturalism is not true.
7. If naturalism is not true, then it is possible to justify belief in morality and goodness.
-thus We are justified in belief in morals and goodness.
8. If we are justified we must all know we are justified.
9. Without knowing the source of morality even in case of naturalism being false, we aren't justified.
-thus Therefore we know the source of morality.
10. The source of morality giving how important morality is by definition the most sacred and important thing to be valued.
thus-God exists.

This thread is "not even wrong".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong