Christianity Is The BEST Religion....

[LadyForCamus]

[Amarok]

If life is just chemistry, why can't we just chemically keep someone alive indefinitely? My cell phone can be powered indefinitely through chemistry, the human body... not so much.

1. No a cell phone cannot be powered forever it will die eventually 

2. You assume the because a process is chemical it can be done indefinitely . This is false. 

3. You cell phone does not go through the same chemical alteration as a living thing so the example fails .

4. Even if we could regen cells forever . How would that cause problems for christianity?

---

If something is real, it is fact. Abiogenesis is not fact therefor it is not real.

That is pure gibberish

[Mister Agenda]

But Huggs, isn't that what you believe too?  Unless you think God is a kind of life, i.e., biologically based being.

Nope, if God is light, that makes him energy, which makes life energy, which means that life has always existed. Does not the Bible state that before the world was even made the the sons of God shouted for joy?

And what is God supposed to have made life out of? If not other life, it's a form of abiogenesis, life from non-life.

[Ravenshire]

You're just butt-hurt because science has real answers, while you're stuck with a god who got blindsided by a Talking Snake™ three chapters into Genesis.  

Now be a good little god-bot and get to work on solving that "yes, no, maybe" prayer quality control problem.

I have no problems with God and Christianity, that would be you and no science doesn't have real answers all the time, astrophysics has moved into the realm of fairy tales big time they have come up with a thousand ways the earth will be destroyed and yet in the supposed 4 billion years of time for this planet none of them have happened, in four billion years by their telling the earth should have long been gone.

GC

---

The laws of physics do not preclude evolution.

At all.

Neither does the ultimate fate of the universe, whatever it may be, nullify what is happening right now in living organisms all over this planet.

So you're saying physics is junk science, how loyal of you.

GC

---

To all the rest who replied to my post I'm not going to get into a running battle with you there are to many wanting replies and I haven't the time so here is how it will stand. astrophysics has told so many contradicting stories about the universe on so many subjects and so many levels that it is a joke of science, The Scientist can't agree on anything so they all promote their own fairy tales and yes that's what they are because none of them can be proven and most of what they claim hasn't been seen to exist, So as you say to me the one making the claim has the responsibility to prove the claim. I'm guessing there isn't enough time for them to do this. They are even making up stories about killer particles that can destroy galaxies and even the whole universe, they couldn't possibly know of such a particle and live to tell about it, now how stupid is that and you all call me gullible.
 As for evolution, until someone can prove that new information can be added to DNA naturally then tho whole of evolution is dead, it has never been proven and it never will be, end of story. Write all you want I will not waste my time with trying to answer 10 or more people in the same thread and about the same post. Good night and sweet dreams.

GC

And, the willful ignorance of the overly arrogant continues without abatement.

HC, every time you go as low as I think it's possible for a human intellect to descend, you always manage to pulmonary out a shovel and sign a little deeper. Careful that well of willful ignorance you've dug doesn't fall in behind you.

[Huggy Bear]

[Mister Agenda]

[Huggy Bear]

[Astreja]

There is as of yet no definitive, experimentally-verified link between neurology and quantum physics.

I tried to read Penrose's book The Emperor's New Mind but gave up in disgust after a few chapters. A lot of what-ifs but not a hell of a lot of substance, despite the book's enormous size.

[Whateverist]

If life can exist after death of the body then is has to be some form of energy, you cannot say that life cannot exist after death because you don't know;

There is no basis for suggesting that life can continue after death, so there is no reason to raise that as a possibility.  Death just is the end of a life.  If it wasn't alive it can't die.  If it has died it is no longer alive.  You can't know that there is a supernatural zone where your supernatural soul-body will go when your flesh and blood body dies.  That is just a fantasy that has been told so long by so many that it seems like something you can say publicly to other adults and get agreement.  But for those of us lacking that crazy idea there is reason to give it the slightest consideration.  That part of what you believe is absolutely absurd.

but if life is energy then according to science it continues to exist...

Life requires energy just as many other things do.  Life itself is not energy.  A light bulb requires electricity to be lit, but the bulb itself is not electricity.  A gas powered car requires fuel to run, but the car itself is not fuel.  How do you come up with this rubbish?

Like I've said, it's funny how science seems to corroborate what the bible has been saying all along.

No, if you only want to use science to confirm those parts of your fable that haven't already run aground on reality, then you are obviously someone with no real appreciation for science or how it works.  Nobody hearing you proudly exclaiming how your fable fits with science will pay you any mind so long as they've already heard you dismiss science out of hand where it contradicts your non-negotiable beliefs.

[Huggy Bear]