SCOTUS Tells Anti-Abortion Nuts To Go Fuck Themselves

[A Theist]

Everybody just needs to stay out of my uterus......

-Teresa

You can't throw me out! I just redecorated!

[Amarok]

Your suspicion is incorrect. Every month there are draws out of my bank account for 4 or 5 (I've lost count) of those programs where you sponsor a poor child, and a draw for a local women's shelter.

Oh wow you scrap the crumbs from your table every month . What a saint you are

[Anomalocaris]

Good.  Those fucking assholes need to hear that more and more.

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/04/supreme...deo-cases/

Supreme Court rejects anti-abortion activists’ undercover video cases

Anti-abortion activists fucking themselves is one way to reduce the need for abortion that I can approve of.

[Whateverist]

Except, I haven't done that. I've never mocked, belittled, or put down a person for having an abortion.


Except, I haven't done that. I didn't say I'm better than anyone. I did exactly the opposite of that - I admitted I'm a murderer.


Taking tips on Christian living from an atheist is like taking tips on cooking a steak from a vegan.

Why are you here?

Maybe his mum forgot to keep her legs closed?

[Amarok]

Bullshit. She brought her own uterus into this. 

Which is relevant to what you said and the fact it was shaming

I responded accordingly

No you didn't you attacked here personnely 

You're just grasping at an ad hominem/red herring at this point

Nope calling it what is was is neither

because you don't like me calling abortion what it is - murder.

False and it's not . So it's actually you engaging in an Ad hom . Because you don't like us calling your comment what was slut shaming .

[LadyForCamus]

Why are you here?

Maybe his mum forgot to keep her legs closed?

😂

[Whateverist]

Every person in the abortion debate has one thing in common: they weren't aborted.

It is this sort of tautological thinking we've come to expect from victims of early childhood mind control.  Problem for you is you can't get to any statement of consequence by way of a tautology.  Like you belief system, it is closed.

[Anomalocaris]

Every person in the abortion debate has one thing in common: they weren't aborted.

It is this sort of tautological thinking we've come to expect from victims of early childhood mind control.  Problem for you is you can't get to any statement of consequence by way of a tautology.  Like you belief system, it is closed.

Half of those in the abortion debate prove why abortion needs to be more common.

[Amarok]

It is this sort of tautological thinking we've come to expect from victims of early childhood mind control.  Problem for you is you can't get to any statement of consequence by way of a tautology.  Like you belief system, it is closed.

Half of those in the abortion debate prove why abortion needs to be more common.

As a matter of" practicality " 

After murdering a a few stupid people if it gets us to 99% of our goals .......

---

Nope - I'm applying the same judgment to myself as I apply to anyone else

Judgement or not your still a hypocrite 

Your supposition is incorrect.

Not by your comments in just about every cop thread 

In part to point out cheap tactics like this red herring.

Then your purpose here is false . As no such tactic is being used .

That's an extremely personal (and intentionally inflammatory most likely) comment. But, since I'm the one that brought that episode up in the first place, it's fair game.

Except it's not the same as your comment to Tres . Not even close . 

Now if you'd just apply that principle consistently.

We have and you slut shamed. Your storytime does not compare . So stop comparing them .

---

OP spelled "Pro LIFE" wrong.

He's right it should say 

Pro life till it's not practical and you did it yourself  .But it's okay as long as you say your a  bad person that somehow make makes you not a hypocrite by action .

[John V]

I’m sure we’re going to disagree on the details, but yeah, I think at a certain point in gestation it becomes immoral to abort.  I’m not sure where that line should be drawn, but I think it’s a discussion definitely worth having.  I believe it is morally wrong, for example, for a woman to walk into a clinic at 20 weeks pregnant and ask for an abortion simply because she doesn’t want the baby. Now, I know that most late term abortions aren’t for that reason, and we should make exceptions for instances  where the fetus is no longer viable or the mother’s life is in immediate danger, but I would support 20 week bans that fall outside of those circumstances.  At 20 weeks we are no longer talking about a microscopic ball of undifferentiated cells.  We are talking about a living creature with a developing central nervous system that can hear, taste, feel anxiety and comfort, and possibly (I know it’s disputed) feel pain.  Just because a living thing isn’t fully conscious doesn’t mean it’s always morally right to end its life.  I think most of us would say it’s immoral to euthanize, say, a pet hamster just because you didn’t want it anymore and it became an inconvenience.  Why should anyone be allowed to treat a human baby that way?

Yes, we disagree on the details, but in essence we're each willing to judge what a woman does with her uterus. As an atheist who wants to fit in here, you don't say Sorry Tres, but if you're 20 weeks along I have an opinion on what you should and shouldn't do with your uterus - but that apparently is the case.

---

It is this sort of tautological thinking we've come to expect from victims of early childhood mind control.  

You're making an incorrect assumption there.