Best Theistic Arguments

[Angrboda]

[The Valkyrie]

(P)Rik.

The thread is entitled "Best Theistic Arguments", not "Most Regurgitated, Idiotic Theistic Claims".

Just so you know...

[Little Rik]

[Kitan Etos]

People applying sentience to inanimate concepts makes me question their human sentience.

[Little Rik]

 

Little Rik/LR



I am doing this to get your attention

I replied to you as well but you only responded to Jor

That's jaw-drop, not Jor-drop, by the way, (by the way why do you call her "Yog"? That always confuses me!)

At one stage your Jor said that she was a yogini.
A yogini is better known for a female who practice yoga.
Of course her experience in yoga must have been next to zero considering that yoga and atheism are at the two extreme.
So as the BS goes one BS attract more BS and now the poor thing is trapped in a corral of dogmas.
Anyway my calling her yog is a sort of nickname for yogini.  

I responded to you in a post already. Why will you not get back to me?

I do apologize for that but if you copy and paste the thing then I will reply to you.  

I also have a question for you. What do you mean by "life"? Do you mean anything biological or made or DNA? Or do you mean anything that is conscious regardless of whether it is biological or made of DNA?

Thank you for your time

Life is everything that exist.
There is no such a thing as non life anywhere.
Even a stone is full of life.
This life in a stone can not be expressed yet but life is there regardless.
Energy and consciousness are the two sides of the same sheet.
There can or can not be awareness within this life but life is there regardless so the awareness or lack of awareness is what turn life into a stone or into a human.
Full awareness is what make a human into God.

[Little Rik]

[surreptitious57]

As an atheist I say there is no evidence for a creator rather than there is no creator
But I think that the lack of evidence makes the existence of said creator less likely


Life and non life are not fixed states but instead points on a spectrum
A creator is not required in order for biology to come from chemistry

All of existence is transition because everything is in a constant state of motion
The transition from non life to life is but just one point on this eternal spectrum
And so it is therefore no more or no less important than any other one really is
It is only human beings who think some events are more important than others

You fail very badly mate

By saying...........The transition from non life to life...........you already pretend that a non life exist right?

Where on earth is the non life Surr?

Where is the evidence that a non life exist?
That is exactly the question that I keep on asking to yog and that she keep on avoiding

Cant you see that atheism is based only on guesses and dreams?

For the first 800 million years there was no life on Earth as chemistry was not sufficiently complex for it to have developed during this time
When it did become sufficiently complex then life evolved and it had to come from non life because biology cannot exist without chemistry

Also atheism has nothing to do with either evolution or abiogenesis

[Angrboda]

[Divinity]

The best argument for God IMO is that there could be something out there beyond our comprehension. The question is: Why call it god at all? A Creator doesn't have to be a God.

But if you want to argue for a specific god, you're shit out of luck. None of the gods described in any of the religions around today stack up at all. They're all worthless pieces of shit and so are a lot of their followers.

[Edwardo Piet]

The best argument for God IMO is that there could be something out there beyond our comprehension.  The question is: Why call it god at all?  A Creator doesn't have to be a God.

But if you want to argue for a specific god, you're shit out of luck.  None of the gods described in any of the religions around today stack up at all.  They're all worthless pieces of shit and so are a lot of their followers.

I'm sure there is something out there beyond our comprehension. I'm sure we'll never be able to find the first cause because even when we find the first knowable cause that's different to the first cause.

But that doesn't have to be God or even a creator of any kind. Seems misleading to think of a cause as a creator when no intent was involved.