I think somebody's a Billy Joel fan.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 22, 2024, 3:10 am
Thread Rating:
Argument from "You did it wrong"
|
I'd assert the argument that one didn't do it right is refuted in Romans 9 KJV;
18 Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth. No asterisk or anything on this verse, so God uses His capricious nature to dole out the perks regardless of ones piety or fealty. The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
"No true scotsman" is pretty much it. I find it interesting (and one of my main reasons for conversion) that we have to jump through so many hoops to prove an all-powerful creator of the universe that loves us exists - like hold up I didn't pray correctly? Does the god have his own set of rules for each language? What about dialects and cultural colloquialisms?
Vulcanlogician: Was going for Graham and Olsteen (May 21, 2018 at 2:28 pm)zipperpull Wrote: I'm sure some of you have heard/used this argument in the past, and I was wondering if there's a colloquial term for it? I think this kind of argument from a theist is possibly a defense mechanism. Deep down, they may be worried that they may loose their own belief, so they have to rationalise that anyone else that is no longer a Christian, was never one in the first place. It's a textbook "no true Scotsman". You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)