Trump Says Market Would Crash If He Gets Impeached

[Angrboda]

Okay, you're done.  You're not even trying to answer the point.

I'm asking a question that will expose your bullshit.

Make your point or don't. You're intelligent enough to understand what I said. Either you've got a response or you don't.

[John V]

Make your point or don't.  You're intelligent enough to understand what I said.  Either you've got a response or you don't.

The skill set for an editor of a liberal paper is the same as for a conservative paper.

[Amarok]

I'm asking a question that will expose your bullshit.

Make your point or don't.  You're intelligent enough to understand what I said.  Either you've got a response or you don't.

Expecting a clear response from him is like expecting a turtle to win the high jump

[Anomalocaris]

Make your point or don't.  You're intelligent enough to understand what I said.  Either you've got a response or you don't.

Expecting a clear response from him is like expecting a turtle to win the high jump

Expecting a clear response from him is like expecting a clear response from a oily liar who is equal parts conceit, vanity, venality, misanthropy, unscrupulousness, and stupidity, and who is at this moment setting his sights on you as opportunity to showcase what he imagine to be his slippery perspicacity.

[Brian37]

Okay, you're done.  You're not even trying to answer the point.

I'm asking a question that will expose your bullshit.

---

Democrats have been crying impeachment for the entirety of his presidency until something actually impeachable comes along. Why? Because there's a possibility of over 200 Democrats getting elected in November, a lot of them in Trump states. They want to win the elections, so they're putting off their morals until December. 

Gotta love politics.

Bingo! Nice that someone is finally honest enough to say it.  

Say what? That 45 is a fraud and an insecure bully, surrounded by cons? No, we've been saying that for years. The only one delusional here is you.

[Amarok]

Bingo! Nice that someone is finally honest enough to say it.  

No what you mean is someone says what you want to here because it allows you pretend there is nothing going on and that everyone as biased,dishonest , and partisan as you 

[Brian37]

Bingo! Nice that someone is finally honest enough to say it.  

No what you mean is someone says what you want to here because it allows you pretend there is nothing going on and that everyone as biased,dishonest , and partisan as you 

You cant tell someone that far gone that career intel of his own party to the tune of 50 warned us of what he would do, and is doing in office, during his run. You cant tell someone that far gone, that Dan Coats HIS OWN REPUBLICAN INTEL, standing next to Sarah, and several other intel, at a White House press conference, said Russia did and still is interfering, only to have that orange asshole go to a rally and shit on him by denying it.

You cant tell someone that far gone, that 170 intel and diplomats warned him to stop attacking his own intel just a couple weeks ago.

He cant name any other prior President who has repeatedly attacked on a daily  basis the free press, so much so that 350 news organizations all published condemnations of his constant attacks on the press.

45 is a vile pile of shit.

[Angrboda]

Make your point or don't.  You're intelligent enough to understand what I said.  Either you've got a response or you don't.

The skill set for an editor of a liberal paper is the same as for a conservative paper.

Way to attack the example used to illustrate a point rather than attack the point itself. The "skillset" of an editor for a liberal newspaper is not the same as that for a conservative paper as judgements which call upon the editors values are applied, which might not align as well with a conservative paper's mission as that of a liberal paper. But if you don't like the example, no problem. We'll just substitute a different one. Let's say that one is a progressive commentator. One is likely to concentrate on acquiring a position at NPR rather than at Fox News as one's progressive views would be less welcome at Fox. The candidate is interested in a job, not pushing progressive viewpoints. As with Mueller, the difference is that it is the political bias of others and how they may influence those others which is the political reality that one is dealing with. In both cases, the person is not guided in their actions by their political biases, but realistically must accommodate the fact that others are engaged in making politically biased actions which would affect one's ability to accomplish non-political goals. So, no, it isn't Mueller's politics at issue, nor are his politics dictating his decision. That's why, as noted, Mueller's decision is not political, though it takes political realities into account. In that instance, it is other people making politically biased decisions. Mueller is simply reacting to that reality in line with his goals and mandate as special prosecutor.

[Amarok]

The skill set for an editor of a liberal paper is the same as for a conservative paper.

No it's not one requires honesty integrity and impartiality of facts . The other requires you to be a ideological mouthpiece for the party line no matter if it fits the facts (spoilers the former isn't a conservative paper )

[Jackalope]

@OP

The market's going to crash either way. It's inevitable.