Don't take it personally.

[chimp3]

Fuck Muhammed! Don't take it personally!

[Brian37]

What's weird about this. is that I really like, even love you guys.  People like Robvalue etc, who engage in discussion seriously,  I don't have a problem with.

But the people who feel a need to insult me every time I make an argument, I think it shows an act of weakness on their part.

Mystic, please stop. If we were real bigots, meaning we wanted you personally arrested for making absurd claims, and if we thought you were that dangerous, the admins here would have booted you a long time ago.

We simply think you are wrong, and "bullshit" is simply a blunt way of putting it. I don't want you dead, nobody here does. But just like the Christians here, WE DON'T WANT YOU DEAD, we simply want you to THINK!

There are Muslims in the east whom have a right to bitch, you getting offended is not the same. 

I say the same to Christians like Alpha here too, he falsely plays victim here too. Koptic Christians and Kurdish Christians in the middle east ARE VICTIMS. Having your claims picked on here isn't a call for your arrest or death. It merely means we think you are full of crap.

Please stop whining, it isn't helping you.

We do not want you dead ok?

If I really was as paranoid with ABBA like you are with Islam here, there would be lots of people here I could whine like a baby about.

You are not a victim here. You merely do not like our responses.

[LadyForCamus]

What's weird about this. is that I really like, even love you guys.  People like Robvalue etc, who engage in discussion seriously,  I don't have a problem with.

But the people who feel a need to insult me every time I make an argument, I think it shows an act of weakness on their part.

Pointing out to you that, “my book is magic” isn’t a reasonable argument, is not an insult.  It’s just true. The only butt-hurt one here is you, MK.

[Mystic]

It's just an invitation to see for yourself LadyForCamus, whether or not, the book is truly beyond human.

[Minimalist]

The book, like all such books, is sub-human.

[LadyForCamus]

It's just an invitation to see for yourself LadyForCamus, whether or not, the book is truly beyond human.

Nope.  Burden of proof is on you, and you can’t use magic book to prove magic book.

[Mystic]

It's just an invitation to see for yourself LadyForCamus, whether or not, the book is truly beyond human.

Nope.  Burden of proof is on you, and you can’t use magic book to prove magic book.

The Quran happens to address every human with a particular talent they have, and will help them get guided with their situation, what facts they know and what facts they don't know, what guidance they have received and what misguidance and error they are in.

It would make the Quran irrelevant if I can prove Quran without Quran lol.

[Brian37]

Nope.  Burden of proof is on you, and you can’t use magic book to prove magic book.

The Quran happens to address every human with a particular talent they have, and will help them get guided with their situation, what facts they know and what facts they don't know, what guidance they have received and what misguidance and error they are in.

It would make the Quran irrelevant if I can prove Quran without Quran lol.

[Simon Moon]

I know some of you are so butthurt, but his question is bigger then all of us. 

Yes, God has been proven. That's not the topic though.

So, where's the Noble prize?

The question is when you know ad-hominem is a fallacy, why do you constantly resort to it, day and day, out, and specifically when I make an argument.

I don't think you'd know an ad hominem if it bit you on the ass.


There is a big difference between just insulting someone, and claiming their argument is incorrect because of said insult.

In other words, saying that someone is ugly, is not an ad hominem. Saying someone is ugly, and therefore their argument is wrong, is an ad hominem. Please point out examples of the latter.

---

What's weird about this. is that I really like, even love you guys.  People like Robvalue etc, who engage in discussion seriously,  I don't have a problem with.

But the people who feel a need to insult me every time I make an argument, I think it shows an act of weakness on their part.

Here's the problem you are missing.

We've all read your arguments, and we've all pointed out your unsupported claims, presuppositions, fallacies and mistakes in thinking on your part. But time after time, not only do you refuse to acknowledge your muddled thinking, but you continue to just post the same flawed arguments over and over.

So, there comes a point with you, that demonstrating your flawed thinking is just a waste of time. So, insult is just our way of blowing off a bit of our frustration with you.

[LadyForCamus]

Nope.  Burden of proof is on you, and you can’t use magic book to prove magic book.

The Quran happens to address every human with a particular talent they have, and will help them get guided with their situation, what facts they know and what facts they don't know, what guidance they have received and what misguidance and error they are in.

Unsupported assertion. *yawn*

It would make the Quran irrelevant if I can prove Quran without Quran lol.

No, it would mean that you had external, corroborating evidence for your ridiculous claim that a book has magical fucking powers.  But, you don’t, lol.  And, then you get mad when we are not persuaded by you simply repeating, “it’s magical, guys!  It really is!” over and over again.