Gay "cure" therapist outed

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Gays are incurable. Got it.

[Deesse23]

First of all, I'm not obsessed with your bedroom; I'm only concerned about my own cock, you can rot for all I know, sex with a man, sex with a hamster; I don't care or give a fuck.

But tomorrow you will see the consequence of this certain lifestyle, the first known wave was AIDS and other disasters, the second wave will be as or even more terrible. That is just my personal belief; why are you so angry about it?

It's not a dictatorship, I can say my opinion loud and clear. Or you want to be a bonesaw man like MBS of Saudi Arabia?

Condoms prove my point even more: it's so not natural that you need to cover your cock before anal; if you go bareback probably you'll get AIDS some day.
Poor Freddy Mercury is an example.

But for your information, Mercury is a great man and I consider him a phenomena in rock.

It's my personal view. Personal. Take it, leave it, but don't bring a bonesaw with you !

#1 I wonder why you didnt adress my points at all.not.a.single.one. hmmmmm
#2 Why so agressive and suggest that "i can rot", etc. did i hit a nerve? Want to call me gay? Dont have an answer to py points, an answer that doesnt make you look like a bigot and unreasonable and irrational fool? You arent obsessed with my bedroom? Your god certainly is. Do you agree with me that my bedroom is noones business, or do you agree with your god that it is, or are you the stereotypical religious zealot coward who is hiding behind his imaginary friend while trying to mess with other peoples´affairs?  Grow some balls at least! Or, adress my original points if you will.
#3 Why bring hamsters to the game? You better adress my points. Should be easy, if you and your god are right.
#4 What does MBS have to do with this? Right, sb.so.fucking.lutely.nothing. Its just another try of yours to deflect instead of adressing my points
#5 Dictatorship? Who ist trying to dictate? Your god does. Just keep on ranting and making yourself and your religion and your imaignary god look like the bigots you actually are.
#6 Condoms dont prove your point. You point was that gay sex is sin because it cant produce offspring. Condoms also cant produce offspring, making my point. Now you arent backpedaling, but completely changing to my side of the argument (that condoms are anything but sinful), even dragging poor Freddy into this. Dont you feel any shame at all? You are a dishonest and disingenuous dipshit. If i give you the benefit of doubt however then you are too uninformed to see that you are holding contradictory positions.
#7 You fail to rehabilitate your immoral position and disingenuous arguments by dragging a dead person (Mercury) into this argument. A person that you consider to be sinful (but claim to be a "great man") All you are demonstrating is the irrationality of your position(s).

Stop believing in demonstrably contradictory positions, and stop making the demonstrations. Stop being a dishonest an disingenuous prick. People arent stupid, they can actually read the verbal feces you are excreting here.



Just to remind you of your origonal point.

Homosexuality can be criticized mainly for it turning sex into a useless act, and interrupt the natural goal of sex -being meant for reproduction-.

That's why it's a sin, in my perspective.

And now adress my fucking points and stop the deflecting and gish-galopping.

Here are my points again for your reference:

What about elderly couples having sex?
What about usage of condoms?
What about (hetereosexual) anal sex?
What about having sex during the time of the month your wife can not get pregnant?
What about pulling out?
What about vasectomy, getting ovaries removed, or the antibaby pill?
What about infertile men (with bad sperms)?

Did you ever have sex without trying to reproduce?

Bonus question: If sex was intended by god for reproduction, why can a man not willingly control his ejaculation on one hand, but it releases massive amounts of endorphines on the other hand?

[Angrboda]

But tomorrow you will see the consequence of this certain lifestyle, the first known wave was AIDS and other disasters, the second wave will be as or even more terrible. That is just my personal belief; why are you so angry about it?

Wait a minute. Are you opposed to sex because it doesn't lead to babies, or because it may have negative consequences?

Condoms prove my point even more: it's so not natural that you need to cover your cock before anal; if you go bareback probably you'll get AIDS some day.
Poor Freddy Mercury is an example.

You do realize that anal sex isn't a requirement of gayness or gay sex, don't you? It's useful to wear a condom, but not necessary. And for me, gay sex never involves anal.

[The Grand Nudger]

"I didn't say those things I said...and to prove it I'm going to qoute myself saying them!"



Look, dude, either your god hates the homosex, and no one cares..or some asshole who hates the homosex wrote that shit in...and no one cares.

No you will listen, pal.
My God always left a door for repenting, but he isn't ashamed of calling things for what they really are. All this pro-gay wave is a political propaganda for certain people that we very well know, all the rainbow flags and all that shit played very finely as a propaganda asset. It's good for election day !

If you say so...seems like it might not be, what with all the gaybashing and complaints of cultural genocide floating around the rightwing nutosphere.  Good to have your voice added to the hatestream, I guess..though I don't think that your ideological allies are going to consider the color of your skin or your religion any more favorably than they consider teh homosex.

Good luck with your new friends!  Bring a hood, lol.

Go talk about the Soviet Union which had gay rights since the 50s, but because "they were a trait of the Commies" we heard bible verses instead from the Capitalist powers.

Tomorrow, gays will be the enemy once again, and you will be an old man bashing them, and I'll be laughing hilariously. Watch an episode of "Friends" from the 90s to know what I mean, omg homophobia was so fantastic back then !

And what a happy day that will be for you and your homosex hating god that no one gives a shit about!  Amiright or amiright..im right.

(are you really sitting there fantasizing about me.....and as a geriatric gayhater, no less? Might have to pull your hetero card)

[Crossless2.0]

Right, so Abrahamic bigotry. Got it.

Better than a view that is totally built on political views and personal motives.

You Abrahamists are simply incapable of irony, aren't you?

[WinterHold]

the first known wave was AIDS and other disasters,

Aid happened from eat the brains of apes and natural disasters occur everywhere to everyone 

More like a curse, right?

 the second wave will be as or even more terrible. That is just my personal belief; why are you so angry about it?

Because it's repugnant 

No. You must accept difference. Don't use double standards.

It's not a dictatorship, I can say my opinion loud and clear. Or you want to be a bonesaw man like MBS of Saudi Arabia?

Yup and can condemn you for it 

Indeed, just like I can condemn you.

if you go bareback probably you'll get AIDS some day.

Only if your partner has the aids virus aids aren't some demonic force that occurs when you fuck dudes and why do gay bashers forget lesbians exist .

Lesbianism is not mentioned in the story of Lot; only opinions of scholars say so.
I think mainly it's due to the anal penetration.

Poor Freddy Mercury is an example.

And Freddy was a load and proud queer till the end and would be disgusted with you using his death like this  

He was famous. He declared that it publicly; so he gave me the right to use him as an example.
If he was exposed by somebody against his will, then I won't use him as an example.

But for your information, Mercury is a great man and I consider him a phenomena in rock.

Which is insult 

Why? He was good.

It's my personal view. Personal. Take it, leave it, but don't bring a bonesaw with you

And we have every right to criticize it .personnel believe are not immune to scrutiny.

Indeed, I also have the right to insult back.

---

No you will listen, pal.

No you will listen 

I'm wearing headphones.

My God always left a door for repenting,

There is nothing to repent for

Yes there is. You just made a crime against your body.
Nobody has the right to touch you, killing gays is backward an outrageous.

.All this pro-gay wave is a political propaganda for certain people that we very well know, 

If you mean freedom and equality from centuries of irrational persecution then yes 

Please, please, I beg you, don't you ever fall in the mistake that politicians care about "freedom".
Lots of these fucks commanded huge wars that caused the death of thousands -if not even millions-. Many robbed the money of the people.

Your sexual life and dreams are an asset in their eyes; so don't fall for the rainbows, colors and unicorns.

If the need requires; they will butcher you today.

all the rainbow flags and all that shit played very finely as a propaganda asset.

Or it's symbol defying the above 

Absolutely.

 It's good for election day !

It's good  all 365 days 

If you say so..

Go talk about the Soviet Union which had gay rights since the 50s, but because "they were a trait of the Commies" we heard bible verses instead from the Capitalist powers.

Homosexuality was illegal in Soviet union till the late 90s and Stalin purged thousands of gays .

No.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_right..._communism

LGBT rights under communism have evolved radically throughout history. In the 20th century, Marxist states and parties varied on LGBT rights, with some being among the first political parties to support LGBT rights, while others maintained anti-LGBT views. In the 21st century, communist parties in the West are generally pro-LGBT rights.

They didn't steal the space program only from the USSR, but even gay rights, communists were the first in the world. Your sexuality is a toy to politicians.

Tomorrow, gays will be the enemy once again,

Nope

We'll see.

 and you will be an old man bashing them,

Nope 

He will, because he is being a slave for the norm.

 and I'll be laughing hilariously. 

No you'll be a crazed relic of a bygone age 

It's a fear I have..IDK

Watch an episode of "Friends" from the 90s to know what I mean,

WTF?

 omg homophobia was so fantastic back then !

WTF?

That was comedy back then.

[Amarok]

More like a curse, right?

Nope 

No. You must accept difference. Don't use double standards.

Nope see popper paradox and calling you out is not intolerance  

Indeed, just like I can condemn you.

Yup and can condemn you right back 

Lesbianism is not mentioned in the story of Lot; only opinions of scholars say so.

I think mainly it's due to the anal penetration.

It's still homosexuality 

He was famous. He declared that it publicly; so he gave me the right to use him as an example.

If he was exposed by somebody against his will, then I won't use him as an example.

I never said you couldn't but it's shameful to do so 

Why? He was good. 

Bring praised by a gay basher would have him spinning in his grave 

I'm wearing headphones.

That explains a lot 

Yes there is. You just made a crime against your body.

Nobody has the right to touch you, killing gays is backward an outrageous

Nope a free and loving expression is not a crime 

Please, please, I beg you, don't you ever fall in the mistake that politicians care about "freedom".
Lots of these fucks commanded huge wars that caused the death of thousands -if not even millions-. Many robbed the money of the people.

In this case they do 

Your sexual life and dreams are an asset in their eyes; so don't fall for the rainbows, colors and unicorns.

Politician didn't invent the LGBT flag it's their flag and only their flag 

If you say so..

I know so 

No.

LGBT rights under communism have evolved radically throughout history. In the 20th century, Marxist states and parties varied on LGBT rights, with some being among the first political parties to support LGBT rights, while others maintained anti-LGBT views. In the 21st century, communist parties in the West are generally pro-LGBT rights.

They didn't steal the space program only from the USSR, but even gay rights, communists were the first in the world. Your sexuality is a toy to politicians.

Then Stalin rec-criminalized it and for the next 40 years it was a criminal act in the USSR from your own source 

On the other hand, there was increasing pressure from both within and outside the Soviet government to recriminalise homosexuality and to reinstate bans on homosexual intercourse. In the late 1920s Soviet medical research increasingly came to classify homosexuality as a mental disease or as a remnant of bourgeois society.

Relative Soviet tolerance for homosexuality and homosexual rights ended in the late 1920s — as Soviet society came increasingly under Stalinist control. In the 1930s, along with increased repression of political dissidents and non-Russian nationalities under Stalin, LGBT themes faced official government censorship, and a uniformly harsher policy across the entire Soviet Union. Homosexuality was officially labelled a disease.[73] The official stance could be summarized in the article of the Great Soviet Encyclopedia of 1930 written by medical expert Sereisky:

In 1934 the Soviet government recriminalised homosexuality in the Soviet Union. On March 7, 1934, Article 121 was added to the criminal code, throughout the entire Soviet Union, expressly prohibited only male same-sex sexual intercourse, with up to five years of hard labor in prison. There were no criminal statutes regarding lesbianism. During the Soviet period, Western observers believed that between 800 and 1,000 men were imprisoned each year under Article 121.[74]

The rest of your blather is of no consequence

[Rev. Rye]

You do realize that anal sex isn't a requirement of gayness or gay sex, don't you? It's useful to wear a condom, but not necessary. And for me, gay sex never involves anal.

I can remember this scene from a Stephen Fry documentary about homosexuality where he talks about a Ugandan pastor about homosexuality and it takes a shockingly long time for the pastor to even understand the whole "gay men having sex in forms other than anally."





And the look of who I think is the pastor's lady friend near the end is priceless. She's likely lived in an environment where the pastor's views are the default her whole life and even he thinks he's a fucking idiot.