Posts: 66328
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
160
RE: C'mon, Look At All This Stuff That's Real
December 5, 2018 at 7:24 pm
Look, magic book says you have to have something ready to say...it doesn't say that thing has to be true. 
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 2380
Threads: 43
Joined: October 30, 2017
Reputation:
48
RE: C'mon, Look At All This Stuff That's Real
December 5, 2018 at 7:45 pm
Started reading the thread.... And ended up just scrolling.
Posts: 5336
Threads: 198
Joined: June 24, 2010
Reputation:
77
RE: C'mon, Look At All This Stuff That's Real
December 5, 2018 at 7:54 pm
(December 5, 2018 at 7:45 pm)IWNKYAAIMI Wrote: Started reading the thread.... And ended up just scrolling.
It's the same exchange over and over, isn't it? Drich is stubborn and I'm compulsive.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Posts: 2380
Threads: 43
Joined: October 30, 2017
Reputation:
48
RE: C'mon, Look At All This Stuff That's Real
December 5, 2018 at 8:00 pm
(December 5, 2018 at 7:54 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: (December 5, 2018 at 7:45 pm)IWNKYAAIMI Wrote: Started reading the thread.... And ended up just scrolling.
It's the same exchange over and over, isn't it? Drich is stubborn and I'm compulsive.
Yeah, there are always going to be the same types of conversation over and over until..... Both parties actually realize that they have no point.
Posts: 8035
Threads: 47
Joined: September 12, 2015
Reputation:
41
RE: C'mon, Look At All This Stuff That's Real
December 6, 2018 at 5:33 pm
(December 5, 2018 at 4:09 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: (December 5, 2018 at 3:45 pm)Drich Wrote: you should at least wait to see what the guy with 25 years of translating biblical texts has to say before you jump on a broken argument, you might just learn something WITHOUT being stigmatized as being a moron yes man or a johnny come lately.
I hope nobody actually paid you for that job.
The thing about that "job" is that Drich lies, all the time. It is one of the symptoms of the terrible disease called christian apologetics.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: C'mon, Look At All This Stuff That's Real
December 10, 2018 at 1:03 pm
(December 6, 2018 at 5:33 pm)Wololo Wrote: (December 5, 2018 at 4:09 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: I hope nobody actually paid you for that job.
The thing about that "job" is that Drich lies, all the time. It is one of the symptoms of the terrible disease called christian apologetics.
-Or Calling me liar is far easier than to try and reconcile the objections I bring to the weak sauce arguments that is atheism.
What's easier? for Jenhee in the "would they die for a lie thread?" to try and rebuild her argument by some how documented proof hers conclusion is wrong? or taint the well be calling the messenger names? what's easier for wololo? to look stuff up and try and rework history to counter my argument or is it easier to call me a liar? Because that is the thing.. I leave reference material everywhere I can or when ever asked.
Posts: 5336
Threads: 198
Joined: June 24, 2010
Reputation:
77
RE: C'mon, Look At All This Stuff That's Real
December 10, 2018 at 1:36 pm
(December 10, 2018 at 1:03 pm)Drich Wrote: (December 6, 2018 at 5:33 pm)Wololo Wrote: The thing about that "job" is that Drich lies, all the time. It is one of the symptoms of the terrible disease called christian apologetics.
-Or Calling me liar is far easier than to try and reconcile the objections I bring to the weak sauce arguments that is atheism.
What's easier? for Jenhee in the "would they die for a lie thread?" to try and rebuild her argument by some how documented proof hers conclusion is wrong? or taint the well be calling the messenger names? what's easier for wololo? to look stuff up and try and rework history to counter my argument or is it easier to call me a liar? Because that is the thing.. I leave reference material everywhere I can or when ever asked.
Your own references did not support you.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: C'mon, Look At All This Stuff That's Real
December 10, 2018 at 3:12 pm
(This post was last modified: December 10, 2018 at 3:20 pm by Drich.)
(December 10, 2018 at 1:36 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: (December 10, 2018 at 1:03 pm)Drich Wrote: -Or Calling me liar is far easier than to try and reconcile the objections I bring to the weak sauce arguments that is atheism.
What's easier? for Jenhee in the "would they die for a lie thread?" to try and rebuild her argument by some how documented proof hers conclusion is wrong? or taint the well be calling the messenger names? what's easier for wololo? to look stuff up and try and rework history to counter my argument or is it easier to call me a liar? Because that is the thing.. I leave reference material everywhere I can or when ever asked.
Your own references did not support you. when where?
last we spoke as on luke 1 ands the use or identification of herod antipas and I showed you or told you to click on the translation count specifically "Antipas"
looks like this:KJV Translation Count — Total: 44x
The KJV translates Strong's G2264 in the following manner: Herod, Antipas (27x), Herod, the Great (11x), Herod Agrippa (6x).
This will give you each verse that was translated antipas Luke one is included in that 27 times!!!
For stupid f-ing morons who think they still won or my reference does not support me, ask one of your 'smarter friends.' The King Herod of luke 1 without a doubt is anti pas because the greek bears out this translation per the material found in this following link!!!
https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lex...264&t=NKJV
Meaning My reference does indeed support me.
Further more you had this info last week but again you like the other lazy minded atheists rather subscribe to the "drich is a liar' rather than address real reference material that would demand you change your world view!
doesn't that make you the liar? or just a F-ing dumb ass?
Posts: 5336
Threads: 198
Joined: June 24, 2010
Reputation:
77
RE: C'mon, Look At All This Stuff That's Real
December 10, 2018 at 3:45 pm
(This post was last modified: December 10, 2018 at 4:04 pm by DeistPaladin.)
(December 10, 2018 at 3:12 pm)Drich Wrote: (December 10, 2018 at 1:36 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: Your own references did not support you. when where?
last we spoke as on luke 1 ands the use or identification of herod antipas and I showed you or told you to click on the translation count specifically "Antipas"
looks like this:KJV Translation Count — Total: 44x
The KJV translates Strong's G2264 in the following manner: Herod, Antipas (27x), Herod, the Great (11x), Herod Agrippa (6x).
This will give you each verse that was translated antipas Luke one is included in that 27 times!!!
This is what happens when you click on the links for "Antipas" on your source
Quote:https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/s...rimary_0_1
Luke 3:1 ...
Luke 3:19 ...
Luke 9:7 ...
Luke 13:31 ...
Luke 23:7 ...
...but NO reference to Luke Chapter 1 verse 5.
Furthermore, every single reference to Antipas that your source quotes specifies "Antipas" and thrice refers to him as ruler of "Galilee" NOT over Judea. This dovetails with my textural evidence to support my claim.
My source, Oxford University, confirms the mainstream interpretation that Luke 1:5 is referring to Herod the Great.
On the other hand, when you follow your link to see the references to Herod, the Great, look what comes up:
Quote:Luke 1:5 There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth.
You lose, sir. Good day, sir.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: C'mon, Look At All This Stuff That's Real
December 10, 2018 at 4:10 pm
Are you stupid or something?
or is it your hope I don't know how to use my own point of reference???
works for me!!!! cut and pasted:
TOOLS
Unchecked Copy Box Mar 8:15
And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod. G2264
TOOLS
Unchecked Copy Box Luk 1:5
There was in the days of Herod, G2264 the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth.
TOOLS
Unchecked Copy Box Luk 3:1
Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judaea, and Herod G2264 being tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip tetrarch of Ituraea and of the region of Trachonitis, and Lysanias the tetrarch of Abilene,
TOOLS
Unchecked Copy Box Luk 3:19
But Herod G2264 the tetrarch, being reproved by him for Herodias his brother Philip's wife, and for all the evils which Herod G2264 had done,
TOOLS
again let's look at the translation tool again:
The number of times Herod (comma) referring to antipas was translated 27 times.. we know this because antipas it self was not ever used in the bible. so it is herod referring to antipas.(27x)!!!!
The same is true for Herod the great. the title "the great" was never translated in the bible on it's own but herod referring to herod the great was translated 11 times!!! and again for Agrippa (6x)!!!
The KJV translates Strong's G2264 in the following manner: Herod, Antipas (27x), Herod, the Great (11x), Herod Agrippa (6x).
You are intentionally grounding the ball here sport which affirms intentional dishonesty which makes or rather demands toy be identified here as the liar!
|
