Fox News’ Father Jonathan Morris is Quitting the Priesthood So He Can Have Sex

[vulcanlogician]

Wow. I don't think this is significant enough to warrant a Drich "large font" debate. What's going on here is pretty simple.

1) Guy wants to get laid.

2) Guy can't get laid because of weird job requirement.

3) Guy quits job.

4) Guy gets laid.

[Jehanne]

It is ironic, because priestly celibacy only became "enforceable" by the Catholic Church sometime after the year 1000 AD. Prior to that, a lot of priests were openly married.

[The Grand Nudger]

Wow. I don't think this is significant enough to warrant a Drich "large font" debate. What's going on here is pretty simple.

1) Guy wants to get laid.

2) Guy can't get laid because of weird job requirement.

3) Guy quits job.

4) Guy gets laid.

Which shows remarkable testicular fortitude when you think about it.  He could just go out and get laid and keep his job, like the other shamans. It's not exactly a state secret that priests are fucking (and not always fucking the right folks, eh..?). All those nun jokes and nunpron appear to have a solid basis in reality. Brothels for christian fetishists. They have their relationships regardless (gay straight and everything in between), and it becomes a dirty less-than-secret-secret by virtue of that alone even if it wouldn't be otherwise. He's doing the right thing, instead.

[madog]

He should have just changed his aftershave 

[Drich]

The passages you quoted are not from God but from paul. paul is very clear what God's orders are. he says them three different times in three different places. then he opens verse 25 forward to the end of the chapter, with his suggestions

So only Paul is evil but not God.

does not follow...

why is anyone evil here?

God gives laws allowing anyone to marry... Paul is speaking about the persecution christians face and says in his time it is better not to marry as to not bring persecution down on the whole family.

[Amarok]

Wow. I don't think this is significant enough to warrant a Drich "large font" debate. What's going on here is pretty simple.

1) Guy wants to get laid.

2) Guy can't get laid because of weird job requirement.

3) Guy quits job.

4) Guy gets laid.

Which shows remarkable testicular fortitude when you think about it.  He could just go out and get laid and keep his job, like the other shamans.  It's not exactly a state secret that priests are fucking (and not always fucking the right folks, eh..?).  All those nun jokes and nunpron appear to have a solid basis in reality.  Brothels for christian fetishists.  They have their relationships regardless (gay straight and everything in between), and it becomes a dirty less-than-secret-secret by virtue of that alone even if it wouldn't be otherwise.  He's doing the right thing, instead.

Next we find out he's gay

[Fake Messiah]

does not follow...

why is anyone evil here?

God gives laws allowing anyone to marry... Paul is speaking about the persecution christians face and says in his time it is better not to marry as to not bring persecution down on the whole family.

Because you said:

let no man make a law concerning you ablity to marry, people who do so are not from God but from evil spirits.

Then you try to tiptoe around saying that Paul was "only" giving an advice which is obviously not how Pope and Catholics see it, just as when he twice in 1 Corinthians says that, not he, but “the Lord” condemns divorce (1 Cor. 7:10-11, 25), and I am again in crossfire between Christian denominations.

[The Grand Nudger]

You should watch the mormons twist their scrotums into knots on this one.

[Drich]

does not follow...

why is anyone evil here?

God gives laws allowing anyone to marry... Paul is speaking about the persecution christians face and says in his time it is better not to marry as to not bring persecution down on the whole family.

Because you said:

let no man make a law concerning you ablity to marry, people who do so are not from God but from evil spirits.

Then you try to tiptoe around saying that Paul was "only" giving an advice which is obviously not how Pope and Catholics see it,  just as when he twice in 1 Corinthians says that, not he, but “the Lord” condemns divorce (1 Cor. 7:10-11, 25), and I am again in crossfire between Christian denominations.

let no man make a LAW concerning your ablity to marry...

what does paul say in 1 cor 7? if you wheren't so busy about persecuting paul or God you would have READ HIS WORDS more carfully.. let me break it down for you. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se...ersion=ERV

26 This is a time of trouble. So I think it is good for you to stay the way you are. 27 If you have a wife, don’t try to get free from her. If you are not married, don’t try to find a wife. 28 But if you decide to marry, that is not a sin. And it is not a sin for a girl who has never married to get married. But those who marry will have trouble in this life, and I want you to be free from this trouble.

Now verse 32 is you quote:

32 I want you to be free from worry. A man who is not married is busy with the Lord’s work. He is trying to please the Lord. 33 But a man who is married is busy with things of the world. He is trying to please his wife.34 He must think about two things—pleasing his wife and pleasing the Lord. A woman who is not married or a girl who has never married is busy with the Lord’s work. She wants to give herself fully—body and spirit—to the Lord. But a married woman is busy with things of the world. She is trying to please her husband. 35 I am saying this to help you. I am not trying to limit you, but I want you to live in the right way. And I want you to give yourselves fully to the Lord without giving your time to other things.

Same breath mormon he is saying he is not making a law against marriage, but here is what I think you should do.. That is all that is being said.

That would be no different than saying to someone it is not illegal to buy a AR-15 in your state but considering your neighborhood If I where you i would not buy one as it will probably get stolen

READ THE PASSAGES YOUR SELF DUMMY BEFORE YOU SPEAK!

The RC church is wrong here. it conflicts with what the bible says do. it takes and hold church tradition above biblical christianity. Meaning their proabition for clergy to marry is not biblically based.

There are many many different instances where the bible and the RC church conflict.

Which is why Martin luther started the whole reformation movement. to get back to what the bible says is christianity..

The RC church is not dependant on the bible as all other churches are because they believe that the pope has the power to change cannon, meaning change the rules as he goes. 

So in truth the RC church is only about 60% founded in the bible the rest is church tradition/revision.

[The Grand Nudger]

No sola, cretin, lol.

The protestants of the world are spoiled children.