trump announces his bid for reelection!

[The Grand Nudger]

are intentionally being obstinate or do you not know there is a major divide between communism and socialism? Ask stallin and hitler if they are compatible.. if so why did million fight eacth other to install their own personal ism in each others home land?

Spoken without a hint of irony.   Komrade Koncentration Kamp is your candidate.  If I were a trumpist, I would keep stalin and hitlers name out of my mouth, regardless of whether or not I was suffering under the hilarious delusion that either man represented communism or socialism, or that anyone in the us wanted to see us end up in such a ridiculous position, beyond any given trumpists own goose stepping self, ofc.

Tell us more about the gropenfuhrers wonderful hate rallies, though!

IOW....lol.... take all of this nonsense and cram it way back up your own asshole, where you found it.

[Drich]

Hopefully he ran it by Putin first

are you stuck in 2016?

The mueller report shows the only people dealing with russia was Clinton's team buying the false dossier that kicked off the whole russia investigation.

The sum total of tumps involvement with russia was to compliment putin enough to bait you nit wits into thinking he is doing something he was not in order for your politicians to double down and completely commit into bring and manufacturing false evidence to try and get trump impeached. (IE the false russian dossier that kicked off the muller investigation)  for what reason? to drain the swamp! To put people in politics who do things illegally like clinton comby and the rest out of their job and quit possibly in jAil!

---

1.  No, drawing large crowds does not mean you will remain in power.  While the sort of people who attend rallies are likely to vote, not all likely voters attend rallies.

dumbest thing I ever heard. do you have an example of a candidate who drew 20,000+ people to an event consistently and lost the election to a person who struggled to bring out 200 people? Of course you don't! why? because if a man or woman is willing to wait hours if not days in a line over 2 miles long to get in to see a man speak dozens of miles if not hundreds of miles away... why who they not then turn out to vote for the same man a few miles away with a max hour wait time if it is not an in and out process?

2.  Precisely my point.  The size of a crowd that attends a political rally has absolutely nothing to do with that individual's qualities as a leader.  It was stupid of you to compare the size of Trump's crowd to Biden's. Trump is a boob.  If he draws ten million people to a rally, he's still a boob.  If he draws just two people and a choleric dog, the boobosity remains intact.

there is no discernable logic here to refute... this is just your personal blather to which you are entitled to. I won't smash it for the sake of doing so.

[The Grand Nudger]

The mueller report shows the only people dealing with russia was Clinton's team buying the false dossier that kicked off the whole russia investigation.

-and since that's what the mueller report shows, you're going to kindly provide a citation from the mueller report.

Do it, pwn these libtards!

[Drich]

[The Grand Nudger]

I'm glad that you can think for yourself, though I'm not sure what good it's going to do you if these are the products of those thoughts.  

Did you actually mean to say "fox news talking heads say that" rather than "the mueller report shows" ?

[Drich]

I'm glad that you can think for yourself, though I'm not sure what good it's going to do you if these are the products of those thoughts.  

Did you actually mean to say "fox news talking heads say that" rather than "the mueller report shows" ?

Ah... no sport.. fox new was the host for those senators who where being interviewed and saw the full report to personally telling you what was in it.

---

If you clicked on a link you would see these are not point made by a new agency but senators congressmen and DOJ representatives telling what I told you about the report in their own words.

[The Grand Nudger]

Do you have a citation from the mueller report or not?

[Drich]

The report is not complete or rather any access of the report we have is not complete sources and names have all been redacted/edited out. The senate and the DOJ have access to SOME of these redacted portions.

The men speaking are telling you what they saw concerning what is available and telling you what they are allowed to say about the redacted portions.

Again not new media, but senators congressmen and DOJ/department of justice representatives are the ones speaking here. This is second source material sport as primary source material is not available this is the best any of us has access to.. the fact that it is coming from federal representatives seals it as truth.

[The Grand Nudger]

So, no?  Well, go get one..then, then you can pwn the libtards.

---

Here, in the meantime, is a citation from the mueller report.

This report is submitted to the Attorney General pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 600.8©, which states that, “[a]t the conclusion of the Special Counsel’s work, he ... shall provide the Attorney General a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions [the Special Counsel] reached.”
The Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion. Evidence of Russian government operations began to surface in mid-2016. In June, the Democratic National Committee and its cyber response team publicly announced that Russian hackers had compromised its computer network. Releases of hacked materials—hacks that public reporting soon attributed to the Russian government—began that same month. Additional releases followed in July through the organization WikiLeaks, with further releases in October and November.
In late July 2016, soon after WikiLeaks’s first release of stolen documents, a foreign government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump Campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of that foreign government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. That information prompted the FBI on July 31, 2016, to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump Campaign were coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities.
That fall, two federal agencies jointly announced that the Russian government “directed recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including US political organizations,” and, “[t]hese thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process.” After the election, in late December 2016, the United States imposed sanctions on Russia for having interfered in the election. By early 2017, several congressional committees were examining Russia’s interference in the election.
Within the Executive Branch, these investigatory efforts ultimately led to the May 2017 appointment of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller, III. The order appointing the Special Counsel authorized him to investigate “the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election,” including any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign.

This states that it was not steeles dossier that "kicked off the whole russia investigation".  

Your idiotic presidents idiotic son and their idiotic treason meeting, along with the fact that his idiotic campaign staff was bragging about being compromised to foreign governments, and in light of the fact that Russia did interfere in our election - is what "kicked off the whole russia investigation".

[Drich]