Posts: 1713
Threads: 16
Joined: August 2, 2019
Reputation:
6
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 6, 2019 at 9:45 pm
(This post was last modified: August 6, 2019 at 9:48 pm by John 6IX Breezy.)
(August 6, 2019 at 7:37 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: It is amusing. Next weekend, I will be on a road trip with three compadres.
There will be me, the accredited engineer,
The actual tenured professor from a university.
The graduate from a business uni who makes more loot than any of us combined.
And a pure mathemetician.
In order, we will refer to each other as ...
Glorified electrician.
Cheesemonger.
Crap chef
Traitor to the ECB.
Point is that our crank du jour somehow thinks that qualifications are somehow holy. And they are not. The only explanation for that is that he/she is unable to get one.
Or alternately, crank du jour reverses and says qualifications mean nothing. He/she can't make up it's mind
As evidence? Well the stream of moronic posts borne out of jealousy.
It is at least a little sad, but my sympathy has a limit.
Lol I agree, qualifications aren't holy. Though not as irrelevant as religion to this conversation, they don't affect how true any of the statements on this thread are. But its understandable why the forum would ask me what degree I had, where I went to school, and such, so I've told them what seemed relevant.
But hey, given that I don't need my degree to defend my arguments let's do this. From now on, my education level is just a basic high school diploma. I just tore up my degree (you'll have to take my word for it, I already threw it away). So there, I'm not Christian, and I'm uneducated. Let's proceed with the conversation.
(August 6, 2019 at 8:07 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: (August 6, 2019 at 8:02 pm)Succubus Wrote: What is your position on evolution?
Good luck getting that out of him.
Evolution isn't a political stance one can take a position on. Its just a scientific theory; its a tool for formulating hypothesis and explaining bodies of observation.
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 6, 2019 at 10:31 pm
(This post was last modified: August 6, 2019 at 10:31 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(August 6, 2019 at 9:45 pm)UJohn 6IX Breezy Wrote: (August 6, 2019 at 7:37 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: It is amusing. Next weekend, I will be on a road trip with three compadres.
There will be me, the accredited engineer,
The actual tenured professor from a university.
The graduate from a business uni who makes more loot than any of us combined.
And a pure mathemetician.
In order, we will refer to each other as ...
Glorified electrician.
Cheesemonger.
Crap chef
Traitor to the ECB.
Point is that our crank du jour somehow thinks that qualifications are somehow holy. And they are not. The only explanation for that is that he/she is unable to get one.
Or alternately, crank du jour reverses and says qualifications mean nothing. He/she can't make up it's mind
As evidence? Well the stream of moronic posts borne out of jealousy.
It is at least a little sad, but my sympathy has a limit.
Lol I agree, qualifications aren't holy. Though not as irrelevant as religion to this conversation, they don't affect how true any of the statements on this thread are. But its understandable why the forum would ask me what degree I had, where I went to school, and such, so I've told them what seemed relevant.
But hey, given that I don't need my degree to defend my arguments let's do this. From now on, my education level is just a basic high school diploma. I just tore up my degree (you'll have to take my word for it, I already threw it away). So there, I'm not Christian, and I'm uneducated. Let's proceed with the conversation.
(August 6, 2019 at 8:07 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Good luck getting that out of him.
Evolution isn't a political stance one can take a position on. Its just a scientific theory; its a tool for formulating hypothesis and explaining bodies of observation.
So says the weasel who thinks he is slippery enough to be another liar for Jesus without being pinned down as another of that despicable ilk.
Posts: 2435
Threads: 21
Joined: May 5, 2017
Reputation:
26
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 6, 2019 at 10:46 pm
(August 6, 2019 at 9:45 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: Evolution isn't a political stance one can take a position on. Its just a scientific theory; its a tool for formulating hypothesis and explaining bodies of observation.
Dude fuck all this preamble can we just get to the god stuff.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
Posts: 1713
Threads: 16
Joined: August 2, 2019
Reputation:
6
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 6, 2019 at 10:50 pm
(This post was last modified: August 6, 2019 at 10:58 pm by John 6IX Breezy.)
(August 6, 2019 at 10:31 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: So says the weasel who thinks he is slippery enough to be another liar for Jesus without being pinned down as another of that despicable ilk.
If pinning me down as another of that despicable ilk helps you contribute to the topic of vision and evolution (Hint: It doesn't) then pin me down. I'll convert back to Christianity just for you and adopt the most fundamentalist and literal beliefs, if it helps you make one intelligent post on the subject at hand.
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 6, 2019 at 11:04 pm
(This post was last modified: August 6, 2019 at 11:06 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(August 6, 2019 at 10:50 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: (August 6, 2019 at 10:31 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: So says the weasel who thinks he is slippery enough to be another liar for Jesus without being pinned down as another of that despicable ilk.
If pinning me down as another of that despicable ilk helps you contribute to the topic of vision and evolution (Hint: It doesn't) then pin me down. I'll convert back to Christianity and adopt the most fundamentalist and literal beliefs, if it helps you make one intelligent post on the subject at hand.
The “topic” is another one of the typically despicable attempts at manipulative proselytizing by affectation of serious discussion, which incidentally has proven to be one of the only two acts you and your ilk are or has ever been capable of, the other being spooky hyperbolic threats. Yet you comport yourself with such a comically ridiculous air of smugness as if what you conceive to be your ingenuity has just promised to put you on the path to better grace with Jesus by inventing something new that we haven't seen before.
So tell me, why would anyone contribute to a “topic” such as this?
Posts: 1713
Threads: 16
Joined: August 2, 2019
Reputation:
6
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 6, 2019 at 11:06 pm
(This post was last modified: August 6, 2019 at 11:06 pm by John 6IX Breezy.)
(August 6, 2019 at 11:04 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: The “topic” is another one of the typically despicable attempts at manipulative proselytizing by affectation of serious discussion, which incidentally has proven to be one of the only two acts you and your ilk are or has ever been capable of, the other being spooky hyperbolic threats. Yet you comport yourself with such a ridiculously smug air as if what you conceive to be your ingenuity has just promised to put you on the path of better grace with Jesus by inventing something new that we haven't seen before.
So tell me, why would anyone contribute to a “topic” such as this?
I assume they would contribute because they too have an interest in the topic, no?
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 6, 2019 at 11:07 pm
(August 6, 2019 at 11:06 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: (August 6, 2019 at 11:04 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: The “topic” is another one of the typically despicable attempts at manipulative proselytizing by affectation of serious discussion, which incidentally has proven to be one of the only two acts you and your ilk are or has ever been capable of, the other being spooky hyperbolic threats. Yet you comport yourself with such a ridiculously smug air as if what you conceive to be your ingenuity has just promised to put you on the path of better grace with Jesus by inventing something new that we haven't seen before.
So tell me, why would anyone contribute to a “topic” such as this?
I assume they would contribute because they too have an interest in the topic, no?
No, they have an interest in letting you know your game is up.
Posts: 1713
Threads: 16
Joined: August 2, 2019
Reputation:
6
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 6, 2019 at 11:09 pm
(August 6, 2019 at 11:07 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: No, they have an interest in letting you know your game is up.
Lol ok, so then there's your answer.
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 6, 2019 at 11:17 pm
And the lord said: “looketh upon the human eye. That shit is crazy! And, then you will know in your heart that I am your God the Father.”
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Posts: 2435
Threads: 21
Joined: May 5, 2017
Reputation:
26
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 6, 2019 at 11:23 pm
(August 6, 2019 at 10:50 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: (August 6, 2019 at 10:31 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: So says the weasel who thinks he is slippery enough to be another liar for Jesus without being pinned down as another of that despicable ilk.
If pinning me down as another of that despicable ilk helps you contribute to the topic of vision and evolution (Hint: It doesn't) then pin me down. I'll convert back to Christianity just for you and adopt the most fundamentalist and literal beliefs, if it helps you make one intelligent post on the subject at hand.
Troll, liar or lunatic?
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
|