Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 26, 2024, 4:52 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dicks had a meltdown, for good reason.
#31
RE: Dicks had a meltdown, for good reason.
(October 9, 2019 at 12:41 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(October 9, 2019 at 12:39 pm)Brian37 Wrote: HOLY CRAP.......

I am sooooo done, and beyond spray or handgun! It is literally a matter of ease of access and flooded market. But when one side cant even get on board with banning battlefield weapons, what do you want me to say?

America has an unhealthy obsession with all types of firearms. No other westernized first world country comparable to America has anything close to our firearm violence. The issue isn't about rights, it has always been about one industry scaring the shit out of the public needlessly to protect the profits of one industry.

(bold mine)

Does the US have a problem with privately owned anti-tank missiles? 

Boru
And - California outlawed the sale of .50 caliber semi- autos - specifically the Barret M92a - despite the fact that there was never a documented crime committed with one in that state. At $10,000 and 37 lbs weight - it isn't popular with gangland punks.

Reason? Scared shitless reactionary twats were put in charge.
Reply
#32
RE: Dicks had a meltdown, for good reason.
You know, I'm not sure that melting them down was the right idea: they could be officially and permanently disarmed and turned into guitars:





I'm more of a cigar box guitar guy myself, but a proper Escopetarra would be one of the (relatively few at this point) proper 6-string guitars I'd really love to acquire.

""And they shall beat their swords into plowshares,
And their spears into pruning forks;
Nation shall not lift up sword against nation,
Neither shall they learn war any more."
_____Isaiah 2:4 or Mr. Rogers
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.

[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]

I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Reply
#33
RE: Dicks had a meltdown, for good reason.
" Banning battlefield weapons"

What a clueless, uninformed bit of emotionalism.


As if the weapon makes the soldier.


Give me a squad of Navy Seals armed with Remington 870 shotguns (one of the most common civilian hunting weapons in existance) and put them up against a crew of gangbangers armed with machine guns in an urban environment- and you will have a large drop in the crime statistics in about an hour.
Reply
#34
RE: Dicks had a meltdown, for good reason.
(October 9, 2019 at 12:58 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: " Banning battlefield weapons"

What a clueless, uninformed bit of emotionalism.


As if the weapon makes the soldier.


Give me a squad of Navy Seals armed with Remington 870 shotguns (one of the most common civilian hunting weapons in existance) and put them up against a crew of gangbangers armed with machine guns in an urban environment- and you will have a large drop in the crime statistics in about an hour.

I think he’s talking about banning military weapons for civilians, not soldiers. Is there a reason a civilian needs a fully functional AR-15?
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.

[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]

I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Reply
#35
RE: Dicks had a meltdown, for good reason.
(October 9, 2019 at 12:39 pm)Brian37 Wrote:
(October 9, 2019 at 12:22 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: You understand sending them back to the makers will have largely the same effect as selling them to scrap metal, right?

When they sell them to scrap dealer, the makers of the guns still realizes the profit, and it would not affect their future gun production.

If they go back to the maker, the makers will have to credit Dicks for their value, which will leave a hole in their balance sheet, which they will have to fill by putting these guns on the market again where they will take the place of the maker's own future production?


Typically spray means automatic.

If rapid repeat of trigger pull constitute "spray" than everything that does not require manual operation of the bolt would be a spray weapon.

Hair trigger has nothing to do with rate of fire.  It has to do with accuracy of the gun and how much the act of pulling the trigger upsets the aim.  Mass shooting doesn't involve precision aiming.


HOLY CRAP.......

I am sooooo done, and beyond spray or handgun! It is literally a matter of ease of access and flooded market. But when one side cant even get on board with banning battlefield weapons, what do you want me to say?

America has an unhealthy obsession with all types of firearms. No other westernized first world country comparable to America has anything close to our firearm violence. The issue isn't about rights, it has always been about one industry scaring the shit out of the public needlessly to protect the profits of one industry.





 I am taking bets on Brian's blood pressure.
Reply
#36
RE: Dicks had a meltdown, for good reason.
(October 9, 2019 at 1:04 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:
(October 9, 2019 at 12:58 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: " Banning battlefield weapons"

What a clueless, uninformed bit of emotionalism.


As if the weapon makes the soldier.


Give me a squad of Navy Seals armed with Remington 870 shotguns (one of the most common civilian hunting weapons in existance) and put them up against a crew of gangbangers armed with machine guns in an urban environment- and you will have a large drop in the crime statistics in about an hour.

I think he’s talking about banning military weapons for civilians, not soldiers. Is there a reason a civilian needs a fully functional AR-15?

Why not? I hunt deer with a Bushmaster AR-15. It is a very reliable and very accurate rifle - perfectly.suited for whitetail deer - and is no different in function than any other " hunting" rifle.

(Waiting for the clueless to tell me why I am wrong).
Reply
#37
RE: Dicks had a meltdown, for good reason.
(October 9, 2019 at 1:04 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:
(October 9, 2019 at 12:58 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: " Banning battlefield weapons"

What a clueless, uninformed bit of emotionalism.


As if the weapon makes the soldier.


Give me a squad of Navy Seals armed with Remington 870 shotguns (one of the most common civilian hunting weapons in existance) and put them up against a crew of gangbangers armed with machine guns in an urban environment- and you will have a large drop in the crime statistics in about an hour.

I think he’s talking about banning military weapons for civilians, not soldiers. Is there a reason a civilian needs a fully functional AR-15?

OLB and right wing morons on the issue of firearms cant understand the difference between human rights, which nobody is against, and public safety which they don't give a shit about because they are stuck in a utopia hollywood Dirty Harry, Rambo movie that does not exist in reality.
Reply
#38
RE: Dicks had a meltdown, for good reason.
(October 9, 2019 at 1:27 pm)Brian37 Wrote:
(October 9, 2019 at 1:04 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: I think he’s talking about banning military weapons for civilians, not soldiers. Is there a reason a civilian needs a fully functional AR-15?

OLB and right wing morons on the issue of firearms cant understand the difference between human rights, which nobody is against, and public safety which they don't give a shit about because they are stuck in a utopia hollywood Dirty Harry, Rambo movie that does not exist in reality.

(Hands Brian a drool towel)


 Your emotional rants are founded in your insecurities and ignorance. No facts or logic needed.
Reply
#39
RE: Dicks had a meltdown, for good reason.
Color me surprised...another way to start a gun thread that goes no damn where.
[Image: MmQV79M.png]  
                                      
Reply
#40
RE: Dicks had a meltdown, for good reason.
(October 9, 2019 at 1:46 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: Color me surprised...another way to start a gun thread that goes no damn where.

As apposed to the NRA AND GOP whose entire marketing is, "Fuck safety because I want to play Rambo."


Thanks for the lecture.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  OK, Who Had "Cocaine Sharks" for July? Fireball 0 440 July 22, 2023 at 11:27 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  J.K. Rowling had to return civil rights award Silver 68 6861 October 16, 2020 at 10:39 am
Last Post: Rank Stranger
  Walmart follows Dicks sporting goods...... Brian37 106 10756 September 5, 2019 at 3:27 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Good Cop/Bad Cop? Nope. All Good. BrianSoddingBoru4 43 4935 February 25, 2019 at 7:56 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  We need to arm more dicks. Brian37 13 1631 November 29, 2018 at 8:11 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Hitler Had The Same Problem Minimalist 4 825 November 26, 2018 at 6:41 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  I Guess This Fucktard HAd Done All The Damage He Can Do Minimalist 1 683 August 10, 2018 at 2:50 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Dicks sporting goods stops selling assault riffles. Brian37 1 634 February 28, 2018 at 11:18 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Seems As If They Had A Point Minimalist 21 3788 December 25, 2017 at 10:00 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  For A Moment I Thought They Had No Potties In Buckingham Palace Minimalist 5 1469 December 21, 2017 at 7:06 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)