Posts: 42
Threads: 7
Joined: November 14, 2019
Reputation:
1
RE: History Is For Suckers.
November 17, 2019 at 8:00 pm
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2019 at 8:07 pm by redpill.)
(November 16, 2019 at 10:10 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: (November 16, 2019 at 9:45 pm)redpill Wrote: Do as I suggested and find out.
Just for the record, I will do this on one condition, and it's one only a mod can satisfy:
The rules say that "Posting the contents of private correspondence with other members is not allowed."
If I can get confirmation from someone with the authority to enforce the rules that this does not apply to merely summarising the contents of PMs, then and only then will I PM redpill. Because, quite frankly, this is a discussion forum and showing up and hinting at having tantalysing information and then refusing to divulge said information (repeatedly) really strikes me as attention whoring, borderline trolling, and just plain bad form.
What is it you don't get. Freedom of speech isn't allowed around here. If it were, there wouldn't be rules to follow. Also, I want to discuss what you want me to discuss. But doing so someplace where I could get banned for doing so is pointless.
(November 16, 2019 at 10:14 pm)Fireball Wrote: Nay_Sayer posted that he PM'd you, as requested. Did he flip out and is now gone from the forum, after you enlightened him about your revolutionary tech? Or are you just full of shit? You're providing a strange kind of amusing entertainment.  Just a note- if everyone you meet on a given day is an asshole, maybe it isn't them.
"IF" Nay_Sayer did what I told him to do in my PM, there is no longer any mystery to him as to what I was talking about. And I also asked him to not discuss what he found here. So if you're not hearing anything from him on the matter, that just means he is a decent person. But I did tell him it was ok to say here that I wasn't full of shit. You might ask him about that yourself. But anything more, you are just going to have to find out for yourself. Like he did. It isn't as though I'm asking too much of people around here in this matter.
Posts: 11726
Threads: 125
Joined: January 11, 2010
Reputation:
45
RE: History Is For Suckers.
November 17, 2019 at 8:17 pm
(November 17, 2019 at 8:00 pm)redpill Wrote: (November 16, 2019 at 10:10 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Just for the record, I will do this on one condition, and it's one only a mod can satisfy:
The rules say that "Posting the contents of private correspondence with other members is not allowed."
If I can get confirmation from someone with the authority to enforce the rules that this does not apply to merely summarising the contents of PMs, then and only then will I PM redpill. Because, quite frankly, this is a discussion forum and showing up and hinting at having tantalysing information and then refusing to divulge said information (repeatedly) really strikes me as attention whoring, borderline trolling, and just plain bad form.
What is it you don't get. Freedom of speech isn't allowed around here. If it were, there wouldn't be rules to follow. Also, I want to discuss what you want me to discuss. But doing so someplace where I could get banned for doing so is pointless. Dude, I've been here for over 9 years, and you've only been here for three days. I think I have more of an idea of what is allowed on the forum than you do. Hell, I think this evasiveness about what you're actually saying is probably closer to ban-worthy than just having really deplorable opinions.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
![[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/yxR97P23/harmlesskitchen.png)
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Posts: 9333
Threads: 19
Joined: September 8, 2015
Reputation:
79
RE: History Is For Suckers.
November 17, 2019 at 9:12 pm
(November 17, 2019 at 8:17 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: (November 17, 2019 at 8:00 pm)redpill Wrote: What is it you don't get. Freedom of speech isn't allowed around here. If it were, there wouldn't be rules to follow. Also, I want to discuss what you want me to discuss. But doing so someplace where I could get banned for doing so is pointless. Dude, I've been here for over 9 years, and you've only been here for three days. I think I have more of an idea of what is allowed on the forum than you do. Hell, I think this evasiveness about what you're actually saying is probably closer to ban-worthy than just having really deplorable opinions. Methinks that the turd is starting to stink... 
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
Posts: 43963
Threads: 528
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: History Is For Suckers.
November 18, 2019 at 5:31 am
(This post was last modified: November 18, 2019 at 5:32 am by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
Quote:What is it you don't get. Freedom of speech isn't allowed around here. If it were, there wouldn't be rules to follow. Also, I want to discuss what you want me to discuss. But doing so someplace where I could get banned for doing so is pointless.
Well, limited freedom of speech is allowed here. Provided you don't break the rules, you can say your say. The simple evidence that you can continue to be an insulting little wretch with all the social graces of a hemorrhoidal badger on PCP should tell you that.
If freedom of speech wasn't allowed here at all, you'd've been banned by now for being a gargantuan cuntflake.
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 2872
Threads: 8
Joined: October 4, 2017
Reputation:
22
RE: History Is For Suckers.
November 18, 2019 at 6:17 am
(November 18, 2019 at 5:31 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Quote:What is it you don't get. Freedom of speech isn't allowed around here. If it were, there wouldn't be rules to follow. Also, I want to discuss what you want me to discuss. But doing so someplace where I could get banned for doing so is pointless.
Well, limited freedom of speech is allowed here. Provided you don't break the rules, you can say your say. The simple evidence that you can continue to be an insulting little wretch with all the social graces of a hemorrhoidal badger on PCP should tell you that.
If freedom of speech wasn't allowed here at all, you'd've been banned by now for being a gargantuan cuntflake.
Boru
I read his "book". I can confirm two things. Expressing his ideas here would actually buy him a ban, and he actually is a gargantuan cuntflake.
Posts: 43963
Threads: 528
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: History Is For Suckers.
November 18, 2019 at 6:42 am
(This post was last modified: November 18, 2019 at 6:44 am by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(November 18, 2019 at 6:17 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: (November 18, 2019 at 5:31 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Well, limited freedom of speech is allowed here. Provided you don't break the rules, you can say your say. The simple evidence that you can continue to be an insulting little wretch with all the social graces of a hemorrhoidal badger on PCP should tell you that.
If freedom of speech wasn't allowed here at all, you'd've been banned by now for being a gargantuan cuntflake.
Boru
I read his "book". I can confirm two things. Expressing his ideas here would actually buy him a ban, and he actually is a gargantuan cuntflake.
Well, if he can't express his ideas without breaking the rules, they're probably shite ideas to begin with.
As I said, I got through his first few pages, where he froths indignantly about the Old Testament. He appears to be one of these jumped-up pseudo-intellectuals who doesn't realize that his 'new and groundbreaking' ideas are nothing of the sort.
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 19881
Threads: 324
Joined: July 31, 2016
Reputation:
34
RE: History Is For Suckers.
November 18, 2019 at 7:38 am
Kids these days.
Posts: 42
Threads: 7
Joined: November 14, 2019
Reputation:
1
RE: History Is For Suckers.
November 18, 2019 at 9:08 pm
(This post was last modified: November 18, 2019 at 9:14 pm by redpill.)
(November 17, 2019 at 8:17 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: (November 17, 2019 at 8:00 pm)redpill Wrote: What is it you don't get. Freedom of speech isn't allowed around here. If it were, there wouldn't be rules to follow. Also, I want to discuss what you want me to discuss. But doing so someplace where I could get banned for doing so is pointless. Dude, I've been here for over 9 years, and you've only been here for three days. I think I have more of an idea of what is allowed on the forum than you do. Hell, I think this evasiveness about what you're actually saying is probably closer to ban-worthy than just having really deplorable opinions.
Shove your "opinions" up your ass. All I ever speak about are FACTS! Verifiable facts.
(November 18, 2019 at 5:31 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Quote:What is it you don't get. Freedom of speech isn't allowed around here. If it were, there wouldn't be rules to follow. Also, I want to discuss what you want me to discuss. But doing so someplace where I could get banned for doing so is pointless.
Well, limited freedom of speech is allowed here. Provided you don't break the rules, you can say your say. The simple evidence that you can continue to be an insulting little wretch with all the social graces of a hemorrhoidal badger on PCP should tell you that.
If freedom of speech wasn't allowed here at all, you'd've been banned by now for being a gargantuan cuntflake.
Boru
Limited freedom of speech is the same thing as limited truth. Something only a complete asswipe would promote. Do you want to discuss the truthfulness of my statement? Or do you think I should have thrown dirt on it by putting it more politely. Go fuck yourself moron.
(November 18, 2019 at 6:42 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (November 18, 2019 at 6:17 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: I read his "book". I can confirm two things. Expressing his ideas here would actually buy him a ban, and he actually is a gargantuan cuntflake.
Well, if he can't express his ideas without breaking the rules, they're probably shite ideas to begin with.
As I said, I got through his first few pages, where he froths indignantly about the Old Testament. He appears to be one of these jumped-up pseudo-intellectuals who doesn't realize that his 'new and groundbreaking' ideas are nothing of the sort.
Boru
Eat shit and die fuckface. I never said that my views on the bible were "groundbreaking." They were simply my views. Stated in my own way.
Posts: 19881
Threads: 324
Joined: July 31, 2016
Reputation:
34
RE: History Is For Suckers.
November 18, 2019 at 9:38 pm
Hey, pissant, you still here?
Posts: 2755
Threads: 8
Joined: November 28, 2014
Reputation:
22
RE: History Is For Suckers.
November 18, 2019 at 9:48 pm
At work.
Well..... there's 'Polite' and then there's quality invective.
Must admit that your current run of expletives are rather pedestrian there Red Pill.
Cheers.
|
