Who are the impeachment managers?

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Ahh yes, the guy who's 'totally not a trump supporter' once again slurping Trump.  Why am I not surprised?

And you'll of course reply "I didn't even vote for Trump!" which is all part of the script.  "Look at me!  I'm reasonable!  I didn't vote for Trump!  But I oppose impeachment for REASONS!"

It's fun to note who thinks it's socially unacceptable to have voted for T.rump.

[Rev. Rye]

To paraphrase Richard Rampton, the lawyer who defended Deborah Lipstadt against David Irving’s claims of libel:

... there is a difference between negligence, which is random in its effect, and a deliberateness, which is far more one-sided. All Biker’s little fictions, all his tweaks of the evidence all tend in the same direction: the exculpation of Donald Trump . He is, to use an analogy, like the waiter who always gives the wrong change. If he is honest, we may expect sometimes his mistakes to favor the customers, sometimes himself. But Biker is the dishonest waiter. All his mistakes work in his favor.

[onlinebiker]

Ahh yes, the guy who's 'totally not a trump supporter' once again slurping Trump.  Why am I not surprised?

And you'll of course reply "I didn't even vote for Trump!" which is all part of the script.  "Look at me!  I'm reasonable!  I didn't vote for Trump!  But I oppose impeachment for REASONS!"

You are a moron.

You really think that there is only two options.

---

To paraphrase Richard Rampton, the lawyer who defended Deborah Lipstadt against David Irving’s claims of libel:

... there is a difference between negligence, which is random in its effect, and a deliberateness, which is far more one-sided. All Biker’s little fictions, all his tweaks of the evidence all tend in the same direction: the exculpation of Donald Trump . He is, to use an analogy, like the waiter who always gives the wrong change. If he is honest, we may expect sometimes his mistakes to favor the customers, sometimes himself. But Biker is the dishonest waiter. All his mistakes work in his favor.

Another digital idiot.

There's only two kinds of peopleb huh?

[Rev. Rye]

Just saying... for someone who claims they didn't vote for Trump, and claims they don't like Trump, you seem to expend a lot of energy defending him.

[Divinity]

Ahh yes, when called out infiltrators do tend to scream "IDIOT!" instead of making any rational argument (usually because they aren't fucking capable!)

At every turn, you soft defend Trump. Mostly because you know it won't play well if you hard defend him. You whine like a pathetic little bitch about how mean ol' Nancy Pelosi isn't being bipartisan. Because you know hard defending him won't play well here. So instead you turn the argument from "Is Trump Guilty" into "Is the process Bipartisan?"

But who gives two flying fucks if the process is Bipartisan? Bipartisanship is fucking meaningless. A lot of times something being bipartisan means either it's really going to fuck everyone over, or it's something so obvious that we only question why the fuck it didn't happen earlier. It's a COMPLETELY FUCKING MEANINGLESS TERM.

It's glaringly obvious that you're a Trump supporter. But go on, call me a moron again. It might hurt my feelings! I might even cry! Oh wait, no I won't. It's not even a good insult. My 5-year-old granddaughter has better insults than that. At least get some better material. You're barely entertaining.

[onlinebiker]

Just saying... for someone who claims they didn't vote for Trump, and claims they don't like Trump, you seem to expend a lot of energy defending him.

Exactly where do you see me defending Trump?


I think he's an asshole. A fuckstick of the worst sort. A sleazy politician who lies, cheats and connives and Is above nothing to get his way.

Just like that sack of shit - Pelosi.....


So why are you defending HER?

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

In all fairness to OLB, it’s perfectly possible to dislike both Trump and Pelosi.

Boru

[onlinebiker]

Ahh yes, when called out infiltrators do tend to scream "IDIOT!" instead of making any rational argument (usually because they aren't fucking capable!)  

At every turn, you soft defend Trump.  Mostly because you know it won't play well if you hard defend him.  You whine like a pathetic little bitch about how mean ol' Nancy Pelosi isn't being bipartisan.  Because you know hard defending him won't play well here.  So instead you turn the argument from "Is Trump Guilty" into "Is the process Bipartisan?"

But who gives two flying fucks if the process is Bipartisan?  Bipartisanship is fucking meaningless.  A lot of times something being bipartisan means either it's really going to fuck everyone over, or it's something so obvious that we only question why the fuck it didn't happen earlier.  It's a COMPLETELY FUCKING MEANINGLESS TERM.  

It's glaringly obvious that you're a Trump supporter.  But go on, call me a moron again.  It might hurt my feelings!  I might even cry!  Oh wait, no I won't.  It's not even a good insult.  My 5-year-old granddaughter has better insults than that.   At least get some better material.  You're barely entertaining.

Ok..

You're not a moron.

You' re an asshole.

An asshole who can not comprehend a world that isn't "If you ain't with us - you against us".

Take you backwoods hillbilly attitude and stuff it up your ass....

[The Grand Nudger]

Pelosi isn't being impeached. I guess they have their differences, too.

[onlinebiker]

Pelosi isn't being impeached.  I guess they have their differences, too.

Neither is Kim Jong-un...

Does that make him your hero too?