That Gay Thread

[Huggy Bear]

And you're using an op-ed about the current head of Planned Parenthood repudiating the shittier parts of the organisation's founder's views as proof that the organisation is automatically white supremacist, even though the entire point of the op-ed is that they've been moving beyond it.

YOU were DEFENDING Margaret Sanger this whole time, stop it.

Besides, their goal was to decrease the black birthrate, non procreative sex aligns perfectly with that goal.

[The Grand Nudger]

Their dastardly plan backfired when white girls discovered birth control, it even helps with acne!

[The Architect Of Fate]

YOU were DEFENDING Margaret Sanger this whole time, stop it.

At no point did Rye Rye or anyone else defend all Sangers views

Besides, their goal was to decrease the black birthrate, non procreative sex aligns perfectly with that goal.

Lol that's a stretch 

[Rev. Rye]

Their goal was/is to promote birth control. And this isn't for just one race, or even all the non-white races. It's for everybody. Nobody should have to bring children into the world against their will.

---

YOU were DEFENDING Margaret Sanger this whole time, stop it.

At no point did Rye Rye or anyone else defend all Sangers views

Sanger isn't above reproach. I just prefer to not countenance reproaches that aren't based in reality.

For instance, here's an example.
Good reproach: Margaret Sanger held some eugenicist views, and that's shitty.
Bad Reproach: Margaret Sanger held some shitty eugenicist views, and because of that, Planned Parenthood as a whole is automatically a white supremacist organisation, regardless of whether or not their activities in recent years actually act on said founder's eugenicist views. Even if they've announced that they're distancing herself from her specifically because of said views.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Their goal was/is to promote birth control. And this isn't for just one race, or even all the non-white races. It's for everybody. Nobody should have to bring children into the world against their will.

---

At no point did Rye Rye or anyone else defend all Sangers views

Sanger isn't above reproach. I just prefer to not countenance reproaches that aren't based in reality.

For instance, here's an example.
Good reproach: Margaret Sanger held some eugenicist views, and that's shitty.
Bad Reproach: Margaret Sanger held some shitty eugenicist views, and because of that, Planned Parenthood as a whole is automatically a white supremacist organisation, regardless of whether or not their activities in recent years actually act on said founder's eugenicist views. Even if they've announced that they're distancing herself from her specifically because of said views.

Of course, Sanger is like any other historical figure she complicated a mix of ideas that would rightly horrify a 21st-century person and still did some good things. Then to go full nutter and claim that supporting LGBT people be LGBT is akin to wiping out black people because it won't result in kids is just 

[Rev. Rye]

And trying to promote extinction via a practice that less than 10% of the population are going to be into, and knowing that a good-sized portion of that less than 10% are going to also be into heterosexual sex anyway sounds like a very lackadaisical method of genocide.

[LadyForCamus]

So, you’ve basically turned this into a giant pissing match, pitting the white LGBTQ community against the black community as if helping one group out is somehow hurting the other. What is seriously wrong with you?

Nothing to say as it relates to the actual facts? White LBGT beyond reproach?

According to you, it’s not the white LGBTQ folks, but rather their sinister donors. Because…reasons? I can’t quite piece it together. Can you?

[Rev. Rye]

You know, when I was badgering him to answer your question, I was honestly expecting something more coherent.

[LadyForCamus]

And trying to promote extinction via a practice that less than 10% of the population are going to be into, and knowing that a good-sized portion of that less than 10% are going to also be into heterosexual sex anyway sounds like a very lackadaisical method of genocide.

Right, and it’s not like members of the LGBTQ community can’t and don’t procreate all the time.

[Foxaèr]

I wasn't expecting anything coherent, because with people like him expectation leads to disappointment more often than not.