[Remember]: how the Spanish infedels treated Muslims

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

How the fuck did Las Vegas get into this?

Boru

Las Vegas is a symbol for the American soft power. In the past, imperial powers invaded land by utilizing two categories of power: -soft power, -hard power.

Hard power is the military, while soft power is non-violent invasion.

So, you convert me into your ideology by beating me or by offering me soft means.
Soft like gambling casinos, money, sex, women -and even men-,...etc.

So..Las Vegas imperialism. Soft power; eh ?

---

Usually when soft power fails, the imperial force display its ugly face behind the alcoholic breath: it's hard power then. Or as I call it "The imperial Kafir Jihad", and boy how ugly that imperial Jihad is..It reaches satanic levels like the atomic bombing of Japan.

If you can find a casino that offers money, let me know.

Boru

[Peebothuhlu]

At work.

How the fuck did Las Vegas get into this?

Boru

Well. You know what happens in Vegas

'Stays' in Vegas.

[Peebothuhlu]

At work.

I believe, at this point, I should be offering you the advice of "Dig upwards, stupid."

So, it's not 'Might makes right.' Because now the Han Chinese are just as correct as the Turks.

And it's not 'Freedom fighters.' because now the American's are just as correct as the Hezbolla.

So we're left with 'My holy book'.

Which, strangely, is exactly what the Christian's, Jew's, Buddhist's, B.J.P., (Add your own possibly persecuted religious group here.) is also crying.

How, oh how, are we to tell which is which? Decisions, decisions.....

Are you sure that is coherent English?

Awesome!

We've established it's not a problem of my incoherence but the boundaries of your self admitted ignorance that are the limits between understanding one another.

So, to make better our thinking for us I will use 'Simpler' words and less gramar.

You, WinterHold, knowing about history? Is fekked.

You, WinterHold, knowing about morals? Is fekked.

All these comments are shown by your previous posts in just this thread alone.

So, the better for you to show a better knowing of such things? Maybe use simple sentences?



Of note. My Snark is currently content and safely asleep in the corner after a very large helping of Boojums.

Cheers.

[Deesse23]

How the fuck did Las Vegas get into this?

Boru

Think its called "trolling".

---

So, you convert me into your ideology by beating me or by offering me soft means.
Soft like gambling casinos, money, sex, women -and even men-,...etc.

US offered you women? US offered you men?
US building casions in the middle east? Where?

[WinterHold]

At work.

Are you sure that is coherent English?

Awesome!

We've established it's not a problem of my incoherence but the boundaries of your self admitted ignorance that are  the limits between understanding one another.

So, to make better our thinking for us I will use 'Simpler' words and less gramar.

You, WinterHold, knowing about history? Is fekked.

You, WinterHold, knowing about morals? Is fekked.

All these comments are shown by your previous posts in just this thread alone.

So, the better for you to show a better knowing of such things? Maybe use simple sentences?

 

Of note. My Snark is currently content and  safely asleep in the corner after a very large helping of Boojums.

 Cheers.

No; use "other words" because the first post was not coherent enough; at least to a non-native English speaker right me, not "grammar" simple words. Burn the cheap card of picturing me as an ignorant; please. and learn to use "other words" because the previous post was a mess.

So, would my morals finally be probable to you if I agreed to every opinion you say, as if I was a parrot?
Didn't you read "Muslim" under my username? that means my religion and morals are quite different from yours. Yes we can have similar morals, but we will also have lots we disagree on.

Your level of "tolerance" though is the standard here. Would you resort to brute force to convert me, or soft power, or discussion, or simply leaving me be?

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

At work.


Awesome!

We've established it's not a problem of my incoherence but the boundaries of your self admitted ignorance that are  the limits between understanding one another.

So, to make better our thinking for us I will use 'Simpler' words and less gramar.

You, WinterHold, knowing about history? Is fekked.

You, WinterHold, knowing about morals? Is fekked.

All these comments are shown by your previous posts in just this thread alone.

So, the better for you to show a better knowing of such things? Maybe use simple sentences?

 

Of note. My Snark is currently content and  safely asleep in the corner after a very large helping of Boojums.

 Cheers.

No; use "other words" because the first post was not coherent enough; at least to a non-native English speaker right me, not "grammar" simple  words. Burn the cheap card of picturing me as an ignorant; please. and learn to use "other words" because the previous post was a mess.

So, would my morals finally be probable to you if I agreed to every opinion you say, as if I was a parrot?
Didn't you read "Muslim" under my username? that means my religion and morals are quite different from yours. Yes we can have similar morals, but we will also have lots we disagree on.

Your level of "tolerance" though is the standard here. Would you resort to brute force to convert me, or soft power, or discussion, or simply leaving me be?

I get that this wasn't addressed to me, but I'm going to answer it anyway, because the level of wrongness is making my brain ache.

First off, you've got the wrong end of the stick as to what soft power is.  It's not an attempt to convert anyone or to take over countries in the way that military intervention can be.  It's an attempt to win hearts and minds.  If the US comes into your country and builds mosques, hospitals, roads, schools and so forth, they aren't trying to change religious beliefs, they're trying to change political views, ie, moving from 'The US is The Great Satan' to 'maybe these guys aren't completely horrors after all - what can we do to return the favour?'. Plying you with sex and money, a la Las Vegas isn't soft power, it's a blatant attempt at corruption (not that it can't work, of course).

Secondly, no one wants you to be a parrot. If I disagree with your views, it doesn't mean you have to agree to mine.

Lastly, I would rather leave you completely to your own devices.  However, when you come out in support of cutting off the hand of a child for stealing a lolly, I consider it a moral imperative to point out that I find such a belief to savage and barbaric. When you misinterpret both history and the historical method to make your tribe look like angels and everyone else look like moral equivalent of a honey badger on angel dust, I feel compelled to tell you just how wrong you are.

Boru

[Peebothuhlu]

At work.

Awesome!

We've established it's not a problem of my incoherence but the boundaries of your self admitted ignorance that are  the limits between understanding one another.

So, to make better our thinking for us I will use 'Simpler' words and less gramar.

You, WinterHold, knowing about history? Is fekked.

You, WinterHold, knowing about morals? Is fekked.

All these comments are shown by your previous posts in just this thread alone.

So, the better for you to show a better knowing of such things? Maybe use simple sentences?

 

Of note. My Snark is currently content and  safely asleep in the corner after a very large helping of Boojums.

 Cheers.

No; use "other words" because the first post was not coherent enough; at least to a non-native English speaker right me, not "grammar" simple words. Burn the cheap card of picturing me as an ignorant; please. and learn to use "other words" because the previous post was a mess.

So, would my morals finally be probable to you if I agreed to every opinion you say, as if I was a parrot?
Didn't you read "Muslim" under my username? that means my religion and morals are quite different from yours. Yes we can have similar morals, but we will also have lots we disagree on.

Your level of "tolerance" though is the standard here. Would you resort to brute force to convert me, or soft power, or discussion, or simply leaving me be?

I think you meant "Practical" or, perhaps "Passable" maybe even "Palatable" rather than "Probable"?

I'll 'Burn the cheap card of picturing you as ignorant' WHEN you demonstrate the qualities to show that you are NOT ignorant.

As for your morals? Again I can only qualify such by what read here and previously. That myself and others continuesly point out the failings in your posts regarding such issues is telling.

As for you pulling the "But mah faith is 'X'!" card?

I currently work alongside somd wonderful people of various cultural backgrounds who belive a myriad of faiths. Professing to be Muslim amongst them.

We've had quite a few chats together comparing ideas, beliefs and knowledge.

Am I some expert? Fek no. Nothing more than an average 'Joe' whose had a 'Chin wag' with other average Joe's about "Life, the Univers and Everything."

Now perhapse I am remise in not understanding what if is like to live in a place where people can not freely discuss such things? This is certainly true.

Can I question, remark on and otherwise show opinions about religion, whether Muslim, Baptist, Mormon, Baha'i, Methodist or whatever have you?

Yes, yes indeed I can both on this forum and in my free and secular country.

The final comment about my 'Tolerance'?

Your faith is demonstratably fekked.

That people openly professing to worship in the same name as your belief can, have and do regularly commit atrocities is why I call said faith so fekked up.

That the best so far you have seemed to muster is "No true Scott's man" is the telling part.

Now, please, go back and show me where I have gone after YOU and not the faith you profess to believe in.

You acknowledged being ignorant of the finer points of English. It is my self and others who constantly point out the flaws, ignorance, simplicity and plain 'Wrongness' of your positions.

However, you seem to WANT me to start 'Playing the man and not the ball'?

Okay Buttercup, drop your pants and touch your toes. I'll show you just how far the dildo goes.

[The Architect Of Fate]

No; use "other words" because the first post was not coherent enough; at least to a non-native English speaker right me, not "grammar" simple words. Burn the cheap card of picturing me as an ignorant; please. and learn to use "other words" because the previous post was a mess.

Nope his english was fine and you are ignorant 

So, would my morals finally be probable to you if I agreed to every opinion you say, as if I was a parrot?

He never said that 

Didn't you read "Muslim" under my username? that means my religion and morals are quite different from yours. Yes we can have similar morals, but we will also have lots we disagree on.

Yes i'm sure he did none of this is relevant 

Your level of "tolerance" though is the standard here. 

If by tolerance you mean calling out barbaric and backward practices then yes . You have confused tolerance (a word i don't use) with moral cowardice .  

Would you resort to brute force to convert me, or soft power, or discussion, or simply leaving me be?

No one trying to convert you to anything you delusional fool . Your Anti west paranoia has reached parody levels .

[The Grand Nudger]

If you can find a casino that offers money, let me know.

Boru

You're looking for trump branded casinos.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

If you can find a casino that offers money, let me know.

Boru

You're looking for trump branded casinos.

Swindling bond holders and paying yourself out of the proceeds isn’t quite the same as a casino ‘offering money’.

Boru