Chauvin Murder Trial

[Angrboda]

What happened in the minutes before Chauvin applied lethal force does change one's understanding of the events of that day.  But your politically correct smear is noted.  Now fuck off.

Are you having a bad day?

Boru

I wasn't until you came along with your asinine posturing. But being effectively accused of condoning someone's murder has that effect on me.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Are you having a bad day?

Boru

I wasn't until you came along with your asinine posturing.  But being effectively accused of condoning someone's murder has that effect on me.

I didn't accuse you of anything - I disagreed with your assessment of the impact of Floyd's behavior before his death. I didn't expect to be snarled at for simply having a different point of view.

Whatever. You be you.

Boru

[Angrboda]

I wasn't until you came along with your asinine posturing.  But being effectively accused of condoning someone's murder has that effect on me.

I didn't accuse you of anything - I disagreed with your assessment of the impact of Floyd's behavior before his death. I didn't expect to be snarled at for simply having a different point of view.

Whatever. You be you.

Boru

Different point of view from what exactly? What "point of view" were you disagreeing with? What were you saying that I was contending had changed, and that you disagreed had changed? Spell it out. Be specific. What "assessment" of mine did you disagree with?

[Losty]

I didn't accuse you of anything - I disagreed with your assessment of the impact of Floyd's behavior before his death. I didn't expect to be snarled at for simply having a different point of view.

Whatever. You be you.

Boru

Different point of view from what exactly?  What "point of view" were you disagreeing with?   What were you saying that I was contending had changed, and that you disagreed had changed?  Spell it out.  Be specific.  What "assessment" of mine did you disagree with?

Seems pretty obvious.
You think what happened before he was murdered is relevant and Boru doesn’t. Did you really need that to be cleared up? People don’t have to agree with you. It doesn’t mean they’re saying you’re condoning a murder. Are you maybe being a little sensitive about this? Or maybe you’re just looking to pick a fight?

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

I didn't accuse you of anything - I disagreed with your assessment of the impact of Floyd's behavior before his death. I didn't expect to be snarled at for simply having a different point of view.

Whatever. You be you.

Boru

Different point of view from what exactly?  What "point of view" were you disagreeing with?   What were you saying that I was contending had changed, and that you disagreed had changed?  Spell it out.  Be specific.  What "assessment" of mine did you disagree with?

Feel free to go back and read who you wrote and my response.  It isn't terrible difficult. In the meantime,\



Boru

[Rev. Rye]

Whether or not that knee choke was a justifiable response to a perp resisting arrest, I cannot imagine it justifying continuing to choke him not only long past the point where he was unable to resist arrest, let alone the point where he lost consciousness.

[Angrboda]

Different point of view from what exactly?  What "point of view" were you disagreeing with?   What were you saying that I was contending had changed, and that you disagreed had changed?  Spell it out.  Be specific.  What "assessment" of mine did you disagree with?

Feel free to go back and read who you wrote and my response.  It isn't terrible difficult. In the meantime,\



Boru

Feel free to go back and read who you wrote? And I'm the one who's disordered here? The reason you won't tell me what assessment I made or what point of view you were disagreeing with is because you weren't disagreeing with anything that I actually said. And now you're leaving in a huff to avoid having to acknowledge that fact. You used the ambiguity of my words as a pretext for moralizing and now you lack the balls to acknowledge it.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Feel free to go back and read who you wrote and my response.  It isn't terrible difficult. In the meantime,\



Boru

Feel free to go back and read who you wrote?  And I'm the one who's disordered here?  The reason you won't tell me what assessment I made or what point of view you were disagreeing with is because you weren't disagreeing with anything that I actually said.  And now you're leaving in a huff to avoid having to acknowledge that fact.  You used the ambiguity of my words as a pretext for moralizing me, and now you lack the balls to acknowledge it.

Ok.

Boru

[Angrboda]

Different point of view from what exactly?  What "point of view" were you disagreeing with?   What were you saying that I was contending had changed, and that you disagreed had changed?  Spell it out.  Be specific.  What "assessment" of mine did you disagree with?

Seems pretty obvious.
You think what happened before he was murdered is relevant and Boru doesn’t. Did you really need that to be cleared up? People don’t have to agree with you. It doesn’t mean they’re saying you’re condoning a murder. Are you maybe being a little sensitive about this? Or maybe you’re just looking to pick a fight?

Relevant to what exactly? It's not relevant to some things and relevant to others. Since I hadn't specified, disagreeing that it necessarily wasn't relevant to anything is pure bollocks. Boru was suggesting that I was saying it was relevant in a certain way. Since I didn't specify what relevance it had, Boru was simply constructing a straw man. Effectively suggesting that I had said something I didn't say.

[Rev. Rye]

I hadn't seen the video of Floyd resisting being put in the squad car before the closing statements. I don't think it's enough to acquit, but it changes things.

So, how, exactly, does it change things?