forbidding people to love each other

[no one]

My corner has 4 boobies, I might be longer the a few moments.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Keep reaching to get people who hurt your fees fees banned Klor 

[The Grand Nudger]

How is insulting the posters of this board and in fact people of the entire world not the same. Life’s mysteries!

Did we want to explore this any further? Here, let’s set a baseline. Kloro, you don’t hurt anyone, so we can safely assume that while you think homosexuality is wrong, you don’t share the bigoted views expressed in the op content and many others, views which are all harm no substance. Would that be a fair expectation?

[R00tKiT]

Kpop:
What a stunning fact... no one. I didn't know animals were your role models of sexuality.


Listen you fucking imbecile, if you start slinging mud, don't to be too surprised if some splatters back.

You're a typical god asshat fan pig, you spew ill will, and feverish contempt for anything that does fit into your ass backwards ideologies, then when the favor is returned, you wail like the cowardly weasel you actually are!

Fuck you very much!!!!

How else should one interpret you bringing up animals to a discussion about homosexuality? 

If your morality revolves around imitating sheep, for example -and since male sheep sometimes ride male sheep, then I can see why homosexuality is not a problem for you. You shouldn't take that too personally, though, and decide to insult family... That's what being an atheist means: an animal. Your atheist friends here can kindly explain to you why you are all animals, after all, just slightly higher on the evolutionary ladder.

[The Grand Nudger]

Things that animals do cannot be credibly called unnatural. You get that, right?

We are all animals ofc, atheists and believers alike. However, there actually isn’t any higher or lower involved.

[The Architect Of Fate]

How else should one interpret you bringing up animals to a discussion about homosexuality? 

The statement was about homosexuality being unnatural. It clearly isn't because it's found in nature. No normative or prescriptive statement was attached to the statement.

If your morality revolves around imitating sheep, for example -and since male sheep sometimes ride male sheep, then I can see why homosexuality is not a problem for you. You shouldn't take that too personally, though, and decide to insult family... That's what being an atheist means: an animal. Your atheist friends here can kindly explain to you why you are animals, after all, just slightly higher on the evolutionary ladder.

Except at no point did No argue for this or anything like this. As for the rest of your unhinged blather it;'s not even worth addressing because it has fuck all to do with anything.

If this was a display of your destructiveness colour me unimpressed

[R00tKiT]

Things that animals do cannot be credibly called unnatural.  You get that, right?

We are all animals ofc, atheists and believers alike.  However, there actually isn’t any higher or lower involved.

You're free to label yourself an animal. Believers at least think there is a god who privileged their species (atheists included OFC).

Animals also regularly murder their own kind.. If we were to consider murder as natural. Then, really, this naturalness criterion should be set aside for now.

[The Grand Nudger]

We also regularly murder our own kind, but that’s not what makes something an animal... and I still think we need to be clear that there’s nothing that animals do that can be called unnatural.

So, in addition to understanding that the entire inference was false, the asserted facts managed to be false as well.

Is that something that you feel might need correcting?

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Things that animals do cannot be credibly called unnatural.  You get that, right?

We are all animals ofc, atheists and believers alike.  However, there actually isn’t any higher or lower involved.

You're free to label yourself an animal. Believers at least think there is a god who privileged their species (atheists included OFC).

Animals also regularly murder their own kind.. If we were to consider murder as natural. Then, really, this naturalness criterion should be set aside for now.

Animals - apart from humans - do not ever, ever EVER murder their own kind. It isn’t possible for them to do so.

 Where do you get this stuff?

Boru

[The Grand Nudger]

A few do, at least. Our closest relatives. But of an aside ofc, since murder by anyone or anything is, in fact, a natural act.

We can set aside the criterion which should have never come up- but we’ll still be left with those pesky issues of argument construction. If we can’t fix those, the next argument will be poor for effectively the same reason.