Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 12:13 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28
#51
RE: Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28
For someone complaining about others interpreting things too literally, this would appear to be a case of being hoisted upon his own petard.
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#52
RE: Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28
(March 18, 2023 at 3:12 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:
(March 18, 2023 at 12:47 am)Fake Messiah Wrote: Because we understand that the stories in the Bible are just fairytales while you are trying to find something that is not there.

There are no fairies mentioned in the Bible, ergo you are a moron who does not know anything.

Unicorns are thou.  

Commence your mental gymnastics routine, go!
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming"  -The Prophet Boiardi-

      Conservative trigger warning.
[Image: s-l640.jpg]
                                                                                         
Reply
#53
RE: Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28
(March 18, 2023 at 9:06 pm)Nay_Sayer Wrote:
(March 18, 2023 at 3:12 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: There are no fairies mentioned in the Bible, ergo you are a moron who does not know anything.

Unicorns are thou.  

Commence your mental gymnastics routine, go!

And Leviathan and dragons...
<insert profound quote here>
Reply
#54
RE: Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28
(March 18, 2023 at 9:09 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:
(March 18, 2023 at 9:06 pm)Nay_Sayer Wrote: Unicorns are thou.  

Commence your mental gymnastics routine, go!

And Leviathan and dragons...

So what, to your mind, distinguishes a fairy tale about talking goats from a Bible story about a talking donkey?

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#55
RE: Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28
Neo is trying very hard to convince himself through trying to convince us that his Holy Bibbly is truth.
  
“If you are the smartest person in the room, then you are in the wrong room.” — Confucius
                                      
Reply
#56
RE: Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28
(March 18, 2023 at 11:32 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:
(March 16, 2023 at 10:28 pm)Ferrocyanide Wrote: Doing the math is a fun exercise.
One person had said 3.25 times all the water in the oceans.
My number came up to 3.12.

Not even close. HE would need enough water to cover the entire earth to an elevation of 29,029 feet [8,848 meters] ASL*, to cover Everest.

*Above Sea Level.

Yes, I did include the height of Everest.
Try the math for yourself. See what you get. It is an interesting exercise no matter if you are an atheist, a yec, a oec, a 5 y old, a 10 y old, a 100 y old.

And if you are talking to a yec, you can explain to them the various details that make their belief a nonsense.
Reply
#57
RE: Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28
(March 18, 2023 at 11:58 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: There are about 1.3 billion cubic kilometers of water in the world’s oceans currently.

Most of the earth’s land mass is at fairly close to the current sea level, mountains and large plateaus form only a small part of land area, so to an first order approximation, we can ignore the volume taken up by mountains when we calculate the volume of water required to raise the sea level 29,000 feet to flood the top of the highest mountain.   It turns out that requires an addition of 4.5 billion cubic kilometers of water, as can be determined by subtracting the volume of a sphere 9 km larger than the current radius of the earth (the size of an earth flooded to drown the tallest mountain) from the current volume of the earth.

So it seems it would require the addition of just under 3.46 times as much water as currently in all of the world’s oceans to drown the tallest mountains.  Round that down slightly to account volumes of existing mountains and plateaus, say around 3.4 times.


Adding 3.4 times as much water in the ocean to the atmosphere, so it can rain out in Noah’s eponymous flood,  would increase the atmosphere pressure of the earth from 14.7 psi to about 19000 psi.    At 19000 psi pressure the air would be twice as dense as water.     Breathing it would be like breathing molasses. 

To keep all the water in the air that’s about to rain out in the vapor phase so as to not be prematurely raining out and ruining Noah’s eponymous ark while it is still under construction, the atmosphere temperature would have to be high enough to keep so much water vapor from exceeding the saturation pressure.

Unfortunately I failed to locate any engineering saturation pressure plot that goes up to 19000 psi.   The highest doesn’t even go 1/10 that high.   But at 1/10 that pressure, the saturation temperature is already 350 degrees Celsius.

To put it differently, even if the atmosphere Noah breathed contained just 1/10 as much water as required to precipitate out and drown the tallest mountain, that atmosphere must have already been hot enough to melt lead to keep all that water from supersaturating the atmosphere and instantly raining out.

Noah must have been quite the champ to be able to work so hard at building the ark while breathing air as thick as molasses and hot enough to at least melt lead.

I think that you are assuming that all that water would exist in a vapor phase in the atmosphere.
The tanakh says that fountains of the deep are also opened up and water popped up from those fountains.

Genesis 7:10 KING JAMES VERSION
And it came to pass after seven days, that the waters of the flood were upon the earth. {7:11} In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened. {7:12} And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights. {7:13} In the selfsame day entered Noah, and Shem, and Ham, and Japheth, the sons of Noah, and Noah’s wife, and the three wives of his sons with them, into the ark;

^^^^^In the text above, we can see 7 days.
7 th day of the month.
40 days and 40 nights.
3 sons and 3 wives.
So, the author tries to hit the magical numbers a few times (3, 7, 12, 40).

It also says that the fountains of the great deep broken up.
I don't know how deep they mean but if it is suppose to be 1 km and more, it would be at boiling point.
I haven't done the math but this could potentially mean that all lifeforms would be steamed to death.
Reply
#58
RE: Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28
(March 18, 2023 at 9:52 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: Neo is trying very hard to convince himself through trying to convince us that his Holy Bibbly is truth.

No, he has made no argument to that effect. He has shown, however, that "Fake Messiah" makes arguments that are dumb.

Fake believes that all Christians believe that every word in the Bible is literally true. And since there are a lot of sentences in the Bible that are not literally true, Fake uses this as an argument to show that Christians are stupid. He believes that in the Song of Songs where it says "Your eyes are doves," Christians believe the woman in question literally has birds in her eye sockets. 

Some Christians believe a lot of the Bible is literally true. But not as many as Fake believes. In fact Fake has argued that until the 19th century, all Christians believed there was no allegory or metaphor or other non-literal expression in the Bible at all. This is obviously wrong, as any history of Christianity will show, but Fake clings to his preferred myth. 

So when Fake used an expression that isn't literally true, Neo pointed that out. If the use of expressions that aren't literally true is a sign of stupidity, then Fake did something stupid. He said "fairy tales," though there are no fairies in the Bible. To be charitable, we would assume that Fake knows this, and that he used the expression to refer to all kinds of folk tales and other myths. But being charitable is not something that one associates with Fake. If he gets to call other people stupid for doing something, then Neo gets to call him out for doing the same thing.
Reply
#59
RE: Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28
(March 19, 2023 at 2:09 am)Belacqua Wrote: No, he has made no argument to that effect. He has shown, however, that "Fake Messiah" makes arguments that are dumb.

No, he ran out of arguments and started making personal insults. Just like you are doing.

(March 19, 2023 at 2:09 am)Belacqua Wrote: Fake believes that all Christians believe that every word in the Bible is literally true.

No, I never said that.
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
Reply
#60
RE: Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28
(March 18, 2023 at 11:35 pm)Ferrocyanide Wrote:
(March 18, 2023 at 11:58 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: There are about 1.3 billion cubic kilometers of water in the world’s oceans currently.

Most of the earth’s land mass is at fairly close to the current sea level, mountains and large plateaus form only a small part of land area, so to an first order approximation, we can ignore the volume taken up by mountains when we calculate the volume of water required to raise the sea level 29,000 feet to flood the top of the highest mountain.   It turns out that requires an addition of 4.5 billion cubic kilometers of water, as can be determined by subtracting the volume of a sphere 9 km larger than the current radius of the earth (the size of an earth flooded to drown the tallest mountain) from the current volume of the earth.

So it seems it would require the addition of just under 3.46 times as much water as currently in all of the world’s oceans to drown the tallest mountains.  Round that down slightly to account volumes of existing mountains and plateaus, say around 3.4 times.


Adding 3.4 times as much water in the ocean to the atmosphere, so it can rain out in Noah’s eponymous flood,  would increase the atmosphere pressure of the earth from 14.7 psi to about 19000 psi.    At 19000 psi pressure the air would be twice as dense as water.     Breathing it would be like breathing molasses. 

To keep all the water in the air that’s about to rain out in the vapor phase so as to not be prematurely raining out and ruining Noah’s eponymous ark while it is still under construction, the atmosphere temperature would have to be high enough to keep so much water vapor from exceeding the saturation pressure.

Unfortunately I failed to locate any engineering saturation pressure plot that goes up to 19000 psi.   The highest doesn’t even go 1/10 that high.   But at 1/10 that pressure, the saturation temperature is already 350 degrees Celsius.

To put it differently, even if the atmosphere Noah breathed contained just 1/10 as much water as required to precipitate out and drown the tallest mountain, that atmosphere must have already been hot enough to melt lead to keep all that water from supersaturating the atmosphere and instantly raining out.

Noah must have been quite the champ to be able to work so hard at building the ark while breathing air as thick as molasses and hot enough to at least melt lead.

I think that you are assuming that all that water would exist in a vapor phase in the atmosphere.
The tanakh says that fountains of the deep are also opened up and water popped up from those fountains.

Genesis 7:10 KING JAMES VERSION
And it came to pass after seven days, that the waters of the flood were upon the earth. {7:11} In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened. {7:12} And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights. {7:13} In the selfsame day entered Noah, and Shem, and Ham, and Japheth, the sons of Noah, and Noah’s wife, and the three wives of his sons with them, into the ark;

^^^^^In the text above, we can see 7 days.
7 th day of the month.
40 days and 40 nights.
3 sons and 3 wives.
So, the author tries to hit the magical numbers a few times (3, 7, 12, 40).

It also says that the fountains of the great deep broken up.
I don't know how deep they mean but if it is suppose to be 1 km and more, it would be at boiling point.
I haven't done the math but this could potentially mean that all lifeforms would be steamed to death.

To hold enough water to drown mountains 9km high, the reservoir of water would need to be at least 9kms deep, that’s assuming the reservoir is a void filled with water, not just an aquifer in which the water only constitute part of the volume.    

Also, for 9km’s worth of water to boil out of the earth, the surface of the earth would have to subside by 9kms.    Which creates the interesting problem of as the surface of the earth starts to subsides, the radius of the earth reduces and the surface area of the earth shrinks.  So the entire crust of the earth would instantly be placed under intense compressive stress, and would have to shorten to accommodate the compression, which  would also close down any cracks or apertures through which the water can come out.

So, I Don’t think the “water coming out of the ground” hypothesis reduces the magnitude of the risibility of the genesis by even the most tiny amount here.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  There are no answers in Genesis LinuxGal 248 20705 March 24, 2023 at 7:34 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Contradiction or Forgetfulness Ferrocyanide 11 1413 February 16, 2022 at 8:54 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  They're going to be chanting to the wrong God. brewer 32 2736 March 17, 2021 at 2:39 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis GrandizerII 614 68384 March 9, 2019 at 8:38 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball
  Genesis interpretations - how many are there? Fake Messiah 129 17138 January 22, 2019 at 7:33 pm
Last Post: donlor
  Just looking for some fun reactions to today's Bible reading drfuzzy 13 2261 January 29, 2018 at 12:42 am
Last Post: Cyberman
  Dr. Craig contradiction. Jehanne 121 25675 November 13, 2017 at 3:24 pm
Last Post: Harry Nevis
  Bible reading Foxaèr 63 7980 October 19, 2017 at 7:55 am
Last Post: John V
  Free interpretation of the Genesis 3:5 KJV theBorg 19 3725 November 13, 2016 at 2:03 am
Last Post: RiddledWithFear
  Genesis - The Prequel! Time Traveler 12 3255 May 17, 2016 at 1:16 am
Last Post: Love333



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)