Women's Rights

[The Grand Nudger]

Intersectionality, man.  Race obsessed people often believe that race accomodation (whatever that is) competes with gender accommodation in a zero sum game such that, for every person in the wrong gendered bathroom, that will be one fewer person of the wrong race allowed to..well...live.  Or, amusingly, if you're race obsessed in  the way that makes you think other races shouldn't be, for every person in the wrong gendered bathroom..that's one more of the bad race that will be allowed to..again..live.

AKA, weird white (privileged) gender motherfuckers are sucking up all the rarified race accommodating juice - for good or for ill.

Stop it, interseconality is a one way street, meaning whatever rights black american descendants of slavery fought for have to apply to every other group,  but it's never reciprocated. LBGT only advocate for their group. Asians only advocate for thier group. Right now Asians are complaining about being rejected for admissions into Harvard at the expense of the black students. Miss me with the Intersectionality bs.

Harvard admits record number of Asian American students while Black and Latino admissions drop

.....case in point, rather specifically and exactly. Moar AZNs means less black volk, and so they can miss you. If they get moar you can only have less. You're a zero sum cultist, and that belief overrides any alliance you might have based on exploited ethnicities. True equality might actually benefit more AZNs than black volk. but you have no interest and no affiliation with that, even though you'd be happy to use "black stats" to prove exploitation.

The only question left to ask, is when we can fit you for a hood.

[Huggy Bear]

Stop it, interseconality is a one way street, meaning whatever rights black american descendants of slavery fought for have to apply to every other group,  but it's never reciprocated. LBGT only advocate for their group. Asians only advocate for thier group. Right now Asians are complaining about being rejected for admissions into Harvard at the expense of the black students. Miss me with the Intersectionality bs.

Harvard admits record number of Asian American students while Black and Latino admissions drop

.....case in point, rather specifically and exactly.  Moar AZNs means less black volk, and so they can miss you.  If they get moar you can only have less.  You're a zero sum cultist, and that belief overrides any alliance you might have based on exploited ethnicities.  True equality might actually benefit more AZNs than black volk. but you have no interest and no affiliation with that, even though you'd be happy to use "black stats" to prove exploitation.

The only question left to ask, is when we can fit you for a hood.

No dummy, the people that benefit the most are the legacy admissions, which aren't based on any merit, If you cared about equality, how about restricting those in favor of more Asian students, instead of penalizing the black students?

Ironically enough it was the white supremacists using the Asians as a tool to accomplish this exact result.

The model minority myth is a tool of white supremacy and a trap’

How about you name any other minority group that advocates for minorities as a whole like black Americans do, i'll wait.

[Huggy Bear]

Stop it, interseconality is a one way street, meaning whatever rights black american descendants of slavery fought for have to apply to every other group,  but it's never reciprocated. LBGT only advocate for their group. Asians only advocate for thier group. Right now Asians are complaining about being rejected for admissions into Harvard at the expense of the black students. Miss me with the Intersectionality bs.

Harvard admits record number of Asian American students while Black and Latino admissions drop

Nice attempt at deflection.

Boru

The proper term is 'rebuttal'

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

psst - it’s not, you know.

Boru

[The Architect Of Fate]

The proper term is 'rebuttal'

No the proper term is deflection. A rebuttal requires you to rebut something. Which you did not.

[Huggy Bear]

psst - it’s not, you know.

Boru

It is, tgn brought up intersectionality and I explained why it was a joke.

[The Architect Of Fate]

No dummy, the people that benefit the most are the legacy admissions, which aren't based on any merit, If you cared about equality, how about restricting those in favor of more Asian students, instead of penalizing the black students?

Ironically enough it was the white supremacists using the Asians as a tool to accomplish this exact result.

The model minority myth is a tool of white supremacy and a trap’

Lol you are the only dummy here huggy and good job refuting nothing Nudge said and going on another empty tangent 

[The Architect Of Fate]

It is, tgn brought up intersectionality and I explained why it was a joke.

Yup he brought it up and then you went on a deranged tangent that refuted nothing he said and then he responded and you went on another one. 

[The Architect Of Fate]

Stop it, interseconality is a one way street, meaning whatever rights black american descendants of slavery fought for have to apply to every other group,  but it's never reciprocated. LBGT only advocate for their group. Asians only advocate for thier group. Right now Asians are complaining about being rejected for admissions into Harvard at the expense of the black students. Miss me with the Intersectionality bs.

Harvard admits record number of Asian American students while Black and Latino admissions drop

.....case in point, rather specifically and exactly.  Moar AZNs means less black volk, and so they can miss you.  If they get moar you can only have less.  You're a zero sum cultist, and that belief overrides any alliance you might have based on exploited ethnicities.  True equality might actually benefit more AZNs than black volk. but you have no interest and no affiliation with that, even though you'd be happy to use "black stats" to prove exploitation.

The only question left to ask, is when we can fit you for a hood.

Amazing isn't it ? 

[Huggy Bear]

The 'has to'' applies to everyone, not just transgenders.

Why should there even be a ‘has to’? For anyone?

Boru

You sound like a child.