Mass shooting in the middle school Vladislav Ribnikar in Belgrade

[Irreligious Atheist]

Death penalty?  Who said anything about a trial?  At any rate, if we let this fester until we’re talking missiles….then missiles will probably be the best option at that point.  I have no idea why you’d think I have a problem hitting terrorist training camps.  I’m sure it doesn’t even register as surprise to any other member of the board that’s ever spoken to me.  Useless for concern trolling or social criticism.

I see that you’ve decided you and a white militia have about the same odds of attacking us citizens.  That’s not great.  Are you a coward blustering or a fully activated nut contemplating?

Your inner fascist coming out. Thanks for confirming you don't give a crap about the 1st amendment, or innocence until proven guilty, or trials, or militarized police (you want them). You want a police state.

You still didn't tell me how you would define terrorist, and I think I know why. It's because you want your government to indiscriminately murder people of a certain political view that you disagree with, based on suspicion that something might happen some day. Very moral of you.

[The Grand Nudger]

Why would I want my government to indiscriminately murder people? How would that even work? I’m pretty sure they’d have to be pretty specific to be effective.

[Irreligious Atheist]

Why would I want my government to indiscriminately murder people?  How would that even work?  I’m pretty sure they’d have to be pretty specific to be effective.

Why does your government allow white nationalist militias to continue training? Because you can't just go based off of what ifs. You can only go on what knowledge you possess at the moment. That's why we can't stop all these white nationalist terror attacks. So you must be suggesting that your government act before they have full proof of what's up, so yes, you do want the government to just go around killing people for training in a field with their guns as is their 2nd amendment right.

[The Grand Nudger]

That’s a great question. Even though these militias are flatly illegal in every state -and- by federal law, we suffer their existence.

[The Grand Nudger]

-dp- lake internet draw, lol.

[Irreligious Atheist]

Look at her face when she says it. Completely straight faced. Then she says it again. Then she says we're not going back. It's a pretty hard cope to convince yourself that she was not being serious.

It’s apparently pretty hard to convince you that a lifelong peacenik who opposes violence is serious about murdering people.

Boru

People are not always who we think they are, like with Noam Chomsky shockingly telling us that it's none of our business what happened with Epstein. People can always surprise you, no matter how well you think you know them. And I think Jane may have been debated out of her stance after the show, so like I said, I'm giving her a decent bit of a pass just as I do the conservatives who say "come and take it." Abortion is an extremely sensitive issue for a lot of people and activists, and I could even understand how Jane Fonda might consider abortion rights as being similar as gay marriage or the right for women to vote, or even slavery. And then the "oh hell no, we're not going back" mindset sunk in with Jane, and she said some things, and I'm not claiming that she still believes what she said initially. Very well may have just been a heat of the moment thing.

[The Grand Nudger]

I’m still wondering what the problem is supposed to be? Jane Fonda says she’s willing to kill if voting and protesting fails.

What’s the problem?

[arewethereyet]

If Jane Fonda was a black man, IA would be defending her/him.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

I’m still wondering what the problem is supposed to be?  Jane Fonda says she’s willing to kill if voting and protesting fails.

What’s the problem?

That’s a fair point. The USian far right is undertaking a eugenics programme under the guise of ‘right to life’. Seems obvious to counter it with another one.

Boru

[Thumpalumpacus]

Acting as if Fonda speaks for millions doesn't strike me as well-supported.

It's not necessarily that she speaks for millions.

Yeah, so she's not representative, but you're happy to billboard this for, I guess, Reasons™.

Anyone here could paste you with an Alex Jones post and your ass would be squealing like a stuck pig ... but you're going to try and slide this by when you know it doesn't represent anyone here.

Hypocrite.