Mass shooting in the middle school Vladislav Ribnikar in Belgrade

[arewethereyet]

[FlatAssembler]

That's called coherentism: accepting beliefs that are coherent with what you already believe.

You might want to look that up.

Boru

I have recently asked a question about coherentism on Philosophy StackExchange: https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/q/100408/57731

[FlatAssembler]

Have you told your buddies on stack exchange about how there couldn't be any Yugoslav war because bombs violate natural laws?

Perhaps you should.  Go bless them with your insights, eh?

I don't think such a question would get a lot of upvotes on any StackExchange forum. Besides, brimstoneSalad already explained to me how bombs are compatible with 2LOT on the PhilosophicalVegan forum: https://philosophicalvegan.com/viewtopic...111#p47111

[arewethereyet]

You might want to look that up.

Boru

I have recently asked a question about coherentism on Philosophy StackExchange: https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/q/100408/57731

NO ONE HERE CARES!

Go there and stay there.  They love you on other forums, according to you.  We are tired of your incessant idiocy.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Like I've explained elsewhere:

Yeah i already read that how the heck you came to that conclusion is freaking mindblowing in how little sense it makes.

[Angrboda]

[Foxaèr]

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

You might want to look that up.

Boru

I have recently asked a question about coherentism on Philosophy StackExchange: https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/q/100408/57731

Then you should know that coherentism isn’t what you said it was.

Boru

[FlatAssembler]

I have recently asked a question about coherentism on Philosophy StackExchange: https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/q/100408/57731

Then you should know that coherentism isn’t what you said it was.

Boru

So, what is "coherentism", according to you? As far as I know, it's a rejection of the correspondence theory of the truth, motivated primarily by the correspondence theory of the truth supposedly being unable to account for counter-factual hypotheticals (but see the answer I received on StackExchange arguing there are indeed ways to account for counter-factual hypotheticals within the correspondence theory of the truth). Coherentism can be summarized as "A true statement is one that is coherent with other statements one believes."

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Then you should know that coherentism isn’t what you said it was.

Boru

So, what is "coherentism", according to you? As far as I know, it's a rejection of the correspondence theory of the truth, motivated primarily by the correspondence theory of the truth supposedly being unable to account for counter-factual hypotheticals (but see the answer I received on StackExchange arguing there are indeed ways to account for counter-factual hypotheticals within the correspondence theory of the truth). Coherentism can be summarized as "A true statement is one that is coherent with other statements one believes."

You seem to be confusing 'coherentism' with 'the coherence theory of truth'.

Coherentism is the position that for a belief to be justified, it must belong to an internally coherent system of beliefs (it is important to remember that a belief can be justified and still untrue). This is manifestly NOT the same as confirmation bias, which is the willful rejection or ignoring of facts and evidence which do not support one's beliefs. This is why you claim to be unaware of the evidence supporting the Yugoslav Wars.

Boru