Posts: 35257
Threads: 122
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: 13 Questions
May 31, 2011 at 7:05 pm
(May 29, 2011 at 10:39 am)reverendjeremiah Wrote: Example: If Sam Harris just came up and said "I have left atheism for Christianity", I would SERIOUSLY doubt his claim. Most especially if he published a book series on it.
Sam can't go back now. He denied the holy spirit on camera, and there is no forgiveness for that sin.
He might as well just sit back and enjoy the fruits of his infideism, cause he sure as shit's fucked anyhow.
Posts: 4446
Threads: 87
Joined: December 2, 2009
Reputation:
47
RE: 13 Questions
June 1, 2011 at 6:20 am
We do not have the authority to accuse someone of having committed the unpardonable sin. To do so would be to condemn the person as forever lost, without hope of redemption. Christians do not have the knowledge or authority to make such pronouncements. Only God and the person knows who has committed the unpardonable sin. Remorse is a sign of conviction. Sufficient remorse would indicate presence of the Holy Spirit.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Posts: 1985
Threads: 12
Joined: October 12, 2010
Reputation:
24
RE: 13 Questions
June 2, 2011 at 12:51 am
(This post was last modified: June 2, 2011 at 1:04 am by Statler Waldorf.)
Posts: 4446
Threads: 87
Joined: December 2, 2009
Reputation:
47
RE: 13 Questions
June 2, 2011 at 2:03 am
You know SW if you put your hide tags inside of your quote tags it would be easier for the reader to see who you were quoting, and which arguements were referenced towards them. Just a suggestion.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Posts: 86
Threads: 2
Joined: April 20, 2011
Reputation:
3
RE: 13 Questions
June 2, 2011 at 3:00 am
(This post was last modified: June 2, 2011 at 3:00 am by Girlysprite.)
Quote:I see your point G-sprite, but I somewhat disagree. The Reformed position is that all that are truly saved persevere to the end. So it logically follows that those who fall away were never truly saved.
Do you have any examples you can give where Christians lied about being atheists prior to their conversion?
There is a difference between the person being sincere and 'being saved'. What I tried to say is that when someone (de)converts others might say 'well I guess he was always just faking a bit anyways'. I person can sincerely be a Christian, but still change their minds later. A person can also sincerely be an atheist and change their minds later on. See my point?
As for examples of 'atheists becoming believers', I can't give a 'famous person' example out of the top of my head. But I have seen Christians on forums like these before proclaiming they had been atheist until they saw the light. Upon further questioning they'd reveal that they had spent a period of their life hating god and blaming him. That is not atheism - if you're hating god and blaming him (as opposed of disliking religion itself) you are still believing in him. That is the point where they misunderstood atheism.
When I was a Christian, I was annoyed with dogmatic condescending Christians. Now that I'm an atheist, I'm annoyed with dogmatic condescending atheists. Just goes to prove that people are the same, regardless of what they do or don't believe.
Posts: 13900
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: 13 Questions
June 2, 2011 at 6:05 am
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 1985
Threads: 12
Joined: October 12, 2010
Reputation:
24
RE: 13 Questions
June 2, 2011 at 7:03 pm
(This post was last modified: June 2, 2011 at 7:11 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
Posts: 5389
Threads: 52
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation:
48
RE: 13 Questions
June 3, 2011 at 7:21 am
(June 2, 2011 at 7:03 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: If people could not come up with the concept of Yahweh on their own, then where did the concept come from in your opinion? Christians don't believe that all of the attributes of the God of the Bible would just naturally be known to someone on an island. However, His existence, power, and glory are attested to by His creation (Romans 1), so that much should be naturally known. Does that make any sense?
Your Yahweh evolved from gods like Ra and Baalal, which is another strike against your religion.
If god is all powerful why did people have other gods for thousands of years before he was thought up.
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Posts: 13900
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: 13 Questions
June 3, 2011 at 2:40 pm
(June 2, 2011 at 7:03 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: If people could not come up with the concept of Yahweh on their own, then where did the concept come from in your opinion? Christians don't believe that all of the attributes of the God of the Bible would just naturally be known to someone on an island. However, His existence, power, and glory are attested to by His creation (Romans 1), so that much should be naturally known. Does that make any sense?
either you have purposefully missinterpreted my post or you are an idiot.
My piont was that although people might have found something to worship it would not be Jahweh, jehova or whatever its decided to call it today.
They may worship a lump of rock, their ancestors, cargo, trees, volcanoes, bodies of water.
The idea of this yahweh person happened just once, but was spread quite forcefully by an invading army, (the israelites) and this mutated into the strange beliefs of christians, but it is not the belief that people come to independantly when left on their own it takes a lot of history and tinkering to build the amount of bullshit that christianity contains.
If the religious evolution happened again there probably would be religion, but it would not look like christianity or islam or any of the others because of the complex interplay and development.
This makes atheism the most consistant regligious position. non belief is non belief.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 1985
Threads: 12
Joined: October 12, 2010
Reputation:
24
RE: 13 Questions
June 3, 2011 at 6:59 pm
|