sexual orientation issue

[Violet]

[Girlysprite]

BWAHAHAHA @ twincest picture!

Let me expand my answers with 'what if it was family'

Incest: I have made clear that if siblings have grown up with each other and start a relation, I would think something was wrong. I would think the same if my em...brother and brother would do that. However, I have a huge family on my mothers side. I can imagine a nephew and niece who have never met before meeting each other during a gigantic family feast and have this spark jump. I would not mind. I would just tell them to be careful.
Also, as for the babies thing, which was commented upon: that was the reason why I said that if a pregnancy occurs, there should be checkups. Lots of. I would not encourage such people to make children though, and advice them not to do it.

Sex with animals i would not approve of, as stated before. So I would be angry if a family member was caught doing it. I would ask though why he/she felt this need to turn to an animal (maybe there are deeper issues?), but clearly state my disapproval of this animal abuse.

sex with dead people: do not approve, as stated before.

Minor sex: I'd go to the police, though some leeway may be given depending on the ages of the persons involved (16 & 15 years old...yeah, I dont bother)

Male homosexuality: My father is one. Yeah, long story. We have a great relationship though, as do my siblings.

Female homosexuality: I have 2 aunts being lesbians. Great people!

Prostitution: When I'd find a family member being a prostitute, my reaction would differ based on how well I know this person. If it is someone I know well, and a person who is more on the shy side, I would inquire carefully if she really is in it of her own free will. I would be open and supportive. If bad things are in play, he/she might need all the available support. If the person is confident and seems to be confident in this choice to, I'd just shrug. Their choice, and it's up to them if they want to share the juicy stories or not! :p btw, I'm from a country where it is legal.

[SleepingDemon]

Incest, pedophilia, necrophilia, and beastiality are all no. The dead, animals, and children cannot consent. Incest is both dangerous to our species on a genetic level, and often a pedophillac relationship. Between brother and sister, mother and son etc are normally done due to psychological issues, and are unhealthy as such. Homosexuality and lesbianism, mmmm lesbians, as long as it is two consenting adults, I don't care. Prostitution should be legal, it is the world's oldest profession, and making things like this illegal turn it over to criminals, which makes it dangerous. Nevada has safe environments like the Bunny Ranch which demonstrate legal prostitution at it's finest...hehe

[Zenith]

[Chido-Wan Kenobi]

1). Unnatural as we know it leads to genetic mutation.

2). As long as you're in Mexico it is okay.

3). Sex should be between two live adults as a dead body can't consent. I guess if you got permission before hand you could do what you wanted.

4). Minors are not old enough to understand the consequences of their actions and are off limits.

5). I could care less.

6). It is awesome.

7). Why pay for something you could get for free with a little work?

Yeah, well, take your #2 opinion, roll it up tightly and insert it into your rectal tract, FaithNoMore. And, by the way, "I could care less" (#5) actually means the opposite of what you think it does.

[Rev. Rye]

1. Very problematic, especially if the sister gets pregnant, as the kid would likely have genetic abnormalities.
2. Gross. I am well aware that my objections to this are merely visceral, and I cannot find a moral alternative.
3. My own personal perspective: I don't think there's anything wrong with this that I wouldn't consider wrong to do with a sex doll. Besides, anybody deranged enough to do that is deranged enough for me to want to write about him.
4. Sex with children is likely to lead to irreparable psychological damage to the child.
5. None of my goddam business.
6. Awesome.
7. Why is it illegal? If some people can't get laid normally, why not let them pay for a sure thing?

[Autumnlicious]

Incest, pedophilia, necrophilia, and beastiality are all no. The dead, animals, and children cannot consent.

Necrophilia cannot be a 'no' due to the fact that consent only applies to a living entity. Also, sex only applies to a living entity, so necrophilia is akin to whacking a piece of steak or other inanimate object.

And in the case of the living, consent is indeed the crux of the matter.

I don't see why incest should be necessarily illegal -- what gives you the right to prevent two people who love each other from loving? Really? Ask yourself what fucking right do you have?

Incest is just sexual intercourse between related individuals -- if they breed, then we have a problem. But as long as they don't breed, there is no harm.

And last I checked, Law looks at harm as a critical factor.

[Zenith]

Necrophilia cannot be a 'no' due to the fact that consent only applies to a living entity. Also, sex only applies to a living entity, so necrophilia is akin to whacking a piece of steak or other inanimate object.

Anyway, I guess for everyone applies this issue: if you know that tomorrow you'll die and the day after tomorrow 10 men will fuck you in the ass, you don't like the idea!

---

4. Sex with children is likely to lead to irreparable psychological damage to the child.

There are people that start their sexual life at 10 (some even earlier, I think).
So if a boy starts his sexual life at 10 years (with a boy or girl of his age) and at 11 he has sex with a mature man (and both agree), is there really a difference?

[Faith No More]

Yeah, well, take your #2 opinion, roll it up tightly and insert it into your rectal tract, FaithNoMore. And, by the way, "I could care less" (#5) actually means the opposite of what you think it does.

Actually, my answers were not meant to be taken seriously. I was actually trying to have a bit of fun with the subject but it seems you take this way too seriously. I'm sorry if you didn't enjoy my joking responses, but there's no need to mention my rectal tract, unless of course you are a doctor of proctology.

Methinks thou needs to get a sense of humor and stop taking what you read on the internet so literally.

[Rev. Rye]

4. Sex with children is likely to lead to irreparable psychological damage to the child.

There are people that start their sexual life at 10 (some even earlier, I think).
So if a boy starts his sexual life at 10 years (with a boy or girl of his age) and at 11 he has sex with a mature man (and both agree), is there really a difference?

Good question. I wrote my answer with the understanding that the child would be pre-sexual.