Evil Atheists

[Epimethean]

I really do think the boogeyman, Santa and the Tooth Fairy are better options for playing make believe than the xtian god. The xtian god is all gristle and no fun.

[Statler Waldorf]

Would you like pictures of the results from genetic sequencing, fossils themselves, geological samples used as boundary markers between epochs, the process of cell division (or any other process of living creatures), electron microscope images, atomic decay, the math that supports all of this, or the innovations that came from all of the above?

No, I want actual pictures of life arising from a single common ancestor. Pictures or it didn't happen!

I love how you just toss out a bunch of scientific jargon you looked up expecting it to prove a thing. Pretty flimsy attempt to prove what you consider to be a well established theory really.

Uhhh no, you must have me confused with somebody else. I don't give a monkey's ass about being civilised. Certainly not towards shitstains. I will always present my case as best I can, but I don't see the need to be polite to people I already know are hit and runners, or people I suspect are being disingenuous. I also have little patience with ramblers or people who display signs of cognitive dissonance.

Surely those people make even you a little embarrassed? When they come in with their blanket statements about how atheists are immoral, if I were you that would embarrass me, because you know what a softball question it is to field.

You are right; I must have had you mixed up with someone else. You just made a huge point about how you don’t think you should act civilized towards believers but then seem clueless as to why believers think you are immoral. That’s actually pretty hilarious.

You mean evidence like ASC?

Yep, that was a REAL winner, wasn't it Stat.

Just because ASC went completely over your head is in no way my problem.

Statler, evidence of evolution is sneakily concealed in books, written by scientists, who do that for a living. I will not post evidence on here supporting evolution, it is readily available to ANYONE. Go to a museum, read a high school biology book. This is remedial biology. It isn't that complicated.

I taught Evolutionary Biology you goof; I was just seeing if you knew enough to back up the theory, apparently you don’t.

And you do believe in magic. You believe that some all powerful wizard spoke some incantation and puffed everything into existence. That is fucking magic. It is horseshit. Show me anywhere in the universe where things puff into existence. It doesn't happen, because reality does not function like that.

Question begging epithet, I don’t believe in any wizards much less one that spoke the Universe into existence. Show me where in the creation model it says that we should still be observing things “poofing” into existence. Do we still observe life evolving from a single common ancestor today? Uh oh! Seems like your own beliefs don’t pass your own b.s. test.

Furthermore, you worship a god, muslims worship a god, hindus worship several gods, humans have worshipped thousands of gods throughout history. Easy evidence. What is more probable, that out of the thousands of gods, thousands of holy books, thousands of creation stories, only 1 is correct? Or that they are all equally false? It's the latter,

What kind of pseudo-logic are you using here? Let’s put your same reasoning to practical use here….

1+1 = ?

Hmmm, let’s see there is an infinite number of possible answers to this problem….they are all numbers though…so what is more probable that only one of them is correct or that they are all false? According to you it is the latter so I guess there is no solution to one plus one…you are right you really are an intelligent person. :-P

Meh, it gives him something to feel superior about, and he sorely needed that. One gets the feeling that the train has left him standing at the station. He likes to quote experts from the early 1900's, and most of his "science" appears to belong in the 17 and 1800's

Still making your irrational appeals to novelty I see. I think the logic train left you standing at the station a long time ago.

I believed but Statler.......Poe.

Poe or not, he is certainly not here for discussion.

This coming from the person who runs from every attempt at discussion with her tail between her legs; sometimes life gives us irony like this to keep us going.

So tell me Statler, did my point make a whooshing noise as it zoomed straight over the top of your head?

I'd like to think it did.

Actually I believe you are thinking of the time that ASC utterly left you dumbfounded. Your point actually made a faint pitiful cry as I crushed it with my logic hammer, don’t worry it’s quite dead now.

[Epimethean]

A logic hammer? LOL!

[Statler Waldorf]

A logic hammer? LOL!

Oh c'mon Epim, you thought it was funny

[The Grand Nudger]

You do realize that the picture you're asking for is actually the only one we have, right? No, no, of course not, that would entail a fundamental understanding of biology. Mea Culpa.

[Statler Waldorf]

You do realize that the picture you're asking for is actually the only one we have, right? No, no, of course not, that would entail a fundamental understanding of biology. Mea Culpa.

You have the picture? Well please present it then.

[The Grand Nudger]

Google any animal you like, you have your picture. I think domestic dogs and some of the newer breeds are a great place to begin. Really drives it home. Or, if you'd like to take it all the way back

http://www.google.com/search?q=archeon+e...00&bih=795

[Statler Waldorf]

Google any animal you like, you have your picture. I think domestic dogs and some of the newer breeds are a great place to begin. Really drives it home. Or, if you'd like to take it all the way back.

Domestic dogs? You do realize that those are all still dogs right? So that is hardly even a good example of speciation. How do different breeds of dogs prove all life came from one common ancestor? You do realize that creationists use the reduction in genetic information that results from breeding domestic dogs to argue against evolution right?

[Violet]

If I were to meet an atheist who presents as a happy, confident, solvent individual, beautiful family, good friends etc (you get the picture) who went on to tell me the secret of his success in life was to lie, cheat, steal and stab others in the back at every opportunity, take no prisoners and give no quarter, be ruthless with strangers and only protect family and loved ones. How could I tell him that his behavior was "wrong" or "evil" using an atheistic worldview? "The tears of strangers are only water" would be an apt motto for this individual.

This forum presents to you a most fabulous specimen indeed: ME! ^_^

I am happy, confident, individual, with a beautiful family, and good friends...

And the secret of my successes in life is to lie, cheat, steal, stab people in the front (usually during sex), take prisoners only when they are worth a lot and give them either no quarter or a very small amount of it, and to be ruthless to loved ones and foe alike.

My behavior is neither wrong nor evil... it is quite correct and most everything I do is good

---

Holy shit... this is 35 pages long. How can you people allow that to happen?

[The Grand Nudger]

Yes, they are dogs, and you are both still vertebrates, and bony fish. Again, you put your ignorance of evolutionary biology out in plain sight as though it were a badge of pride. I've explained this before, to you I believe (and others as well), on this forum.

If dogs one day grew wings, we'd give them a new name. However, they would still be dogs.