(August 14, 2015 at 1:28 pm)ComradeMeow Wrote: It would be pretty horrible. I would make humans slaves and demand worship by a harem of beautiful men and women. I would undoubtedly be a dick but that is why you should not let a sadist be a god. Ironically it seems most gods are sadists though

Who am i kidding,yea,that's exactly what i'd do too.

(August 13, 2015 at 9:41 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: I'd make people rape-proof. They still have free will and can want to rape all they want, but won't be able to do so. It would no more violate their free will than not being able to walk through walls does.

Then society would have died off long ago, that or we be as genetically diverse as our ancestors xenophobia would not allow. Like it or not 'rape' is the reason you all are not still a bunch of inbred monkies.

(August 13, 2015 at 9:38 am)Rhondazvous Wrote: Use your imagination and visualize what would life be like for me if I were a creature in a world you had created?

I should hope it would be as it is. Because as the world is we have a balance at least for a while.

Kittens! Kittens everywhere!

(August 16, 2015 at 11:35 am)Tartarus Sauce Wrote: Kittens! Kittens everywhere!

Uhh sir, I have your order

I would make every lifeform similar to plants. Everything would live off of sun and air. No alimentary systems, no heart, lungs, spleen, liver, etc..

Everyone gets 5% more win!

I might make everything perfect, but then people would have no chance or incentive to create their own perfection. So I’d make sure the planet had plenty of everything people needed to do that. I’d make them super intelligent so they’d not come to erroneous conclusions like wanting to benefit over other’s pain.

They’d be smart enough to have taught themselves how to travel to other planets so there’d be no population explosion.

Someone might say that by making humans super intelligent, I take away their free will. I’d have no choice. The connection between desire and anatomy is such that as designer of the body, I cannot escape the charge of manipulating the will. All I can do is design a body that is conducive to intelligent desires. Maybe I could let each person design his own body, but I wouldn’t put dummies on the same planet with smart people or those who want to do bad things on the same world with those who want to help others. No fire and brimstone punishment. Instead, you’d find yourself on a planet with people just like yourself.

(August 16, 2015 at 12:45 am)Drich Wrote: Like it or not 'rape' is the reason you all are not still a bunch of inbred monkies.

What is it with you and the 'rape thing'? That is one the most ridiculous things you have said yet. Have you got an 'idiot' book that you get this shit from? What is it, "Idiots-r-Us"?

And at least us "inbred monkies" know how to spell 'monkeys'.

(August 16, 2015 at 12:45 am)Drich Wrote:

(August 13, 2015 at 9:41 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: I'd make people rape-proof. They still have free will and can want to rape all they want, but won't be able to do so. It would no more violate their free will than not being able to walk through walls does.

Then society would have died off long ago, that or we be as genetically diverse as our ancestors xenophobia would not allow. Like it or not 'rape' is the reason you all are not still a bunch of inbred monkies.

Huh?

HUH????

So the ONLY way for us to have effectively interbred with non-familial relations in the past is to force sex upon them??? Mutual interest and consent are such big hassles that without the possibility of rape, we simply would have sibling-fucked our way to extinction because we didn't have the slightest clue how to get legitimately intimate with somebody not originating from our family or tribe???

First of all, not every culture from ancient and pre-history was so vehemently xenophobic to the point of solely relying on rape and conquest to spread their genes outside the family. Sure, it was a trademark of the backwater, sheep-herding, barbaric pricks that authored the first half of your favorite book, but they were hardly the golden standard of human intimacy of the ancient world.

For every instance of coerced breeding in human history there are two/three/four/ten instances of two non-blood related humans consensually getting jiggy with it so they could "be fruitful and multiply."

The entire world and all its people did not all operate according to the Jewish standard. They didn't all treat women like cattle to be bought and sold. They didn't all fuck their siblings out of a crippling incapability to interact with outsiders of the opposite sex, and they didn't all over rely on pillaging to spread their genes outside the family.

The fact you think this to be the case snapshots a rather illuminating insight into your thoughts on human relations throughout history and the natural state of human intimacy. Your ideas are at best primitive and ignorant and, more accurately, fucked-up, non-sensical, and contemptuous at worst. It's one thing to say rape was a prominent pastime of some members of past human populations and led to some genetic diversity amongst groups, as any mating between unrelated pairs would. It's an entirely different ballgame to assert that we needed rape to promote genetic diversity because apparently in your vision of history, every major and minor culture was as violently xenophobic and misygonstic as the ancient Israelites.

I say this on behalf of your fellow Christians: stop saying stupid, ignorant shit that paints you as a vile cretin, you make the rest of them look bad by mere association.