Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 5:51 pm
Thread Rating:
|
the hammer of homosexuality
|
|
"...And Lo, what Jesus wrote on the ground was the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the direct words of God to all mankind, so clear and unquestionable that all who saw it were like, Dude, there totally is a God, and Jesus is that God. And thus were billions of lives saved in wars for millennia to come."
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love. (October 22, 2015 at 3:30 pm)Divinity Wrote:(October 22, 2015 at 3:24 pm)Kitan Wrote: That is akin to stating that the proof of spider-man's existence can be found in a spider-man comic. If that were true why hasn't the religion died? Even with false religions their is something powering belief something that underscores what is promised from that religion. In this life Christianity makes claims that are generally reserved for next level, next life people in other religions. (Prophets and even Demi gods) That's a pretty tall order to fill for 2000 years if it was only as you say don't you think?
"For Behold! Jesus had given the people algebra and the Calculus, and Germ Theory, and the secrets of the printing press, and thus did the scientific revolution begin that would keep billions from suffering."
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love. (October 22, 2015 at 4:15 pm)dyresand Wrote:(October 22, 2015 at 2:00 pm)Drich Wrote: And if the bible does not say He is all loving and all forgiving? "I think your missing what he is saying." I am saying God is not all loving. I said their are those in whom God hates. (FYI that is the opposite of what you think I should be saying about God.) (October 22, 2015 at 9:34 pm)Drich Wrote: If that were true why hasn't the religion died? Even with false religions their is something powering belief something that underscores what is promised from that religion. In this life Christianity makes claims that are generally reserved for next level, next life people in other religions. (Prophets and even Demi gods) That's a pretty tall order to fill for 2000 years if it was only as you say don't you think? You know, you're right- that is totally a reason to accept and follow Hinduism's Sanātana Dharma, "the eternal law" or the "eternal way". Except it's 3000 years, not two.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
There, their, and they're.
Please learn when to use each one, Drich.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
(October 22, 2015 at 9:38 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote:It's almost like you stop reading/thinking when you think I walk into a standard atheist arguement...(October 22, 2015 at 9:34 pm)Drich Wrote: If that were true why hasn't the religion died? Even with false religions their is something powering belief something that underscores what is promised from that religion. In this life Christianity makes claims that are generally reserved for next level, next life people in other religions. (Prophets and even Demi gods) That's a pretty tall order to fill for 2000 years if it was only as you say don't you think? Again, even false religions have something supporting what it is they promise. Now if leveling up for the next life is your thing, then that is a 3000 year old religion for you.. Just ignore the billions living in squalor and their failed attempts of 'leveling up.' I'm quite sure you could master it in a single life time while those born in that religion (for hundreds if not thousands of year) fail miserably even in this day and age. Seriously, look beyond the obvious, at everything I am speaking about. Yes I made mention to a 2000 year history, and yes I know their are older religions, so why would I be standing on just the age of the religion? I very clearly pointed to 2000 years of kept promises. Not just vague promises either. I pointed to the fact that Christianity promises its followers the things that the eliete/prophets in other religions don't always get to experience. What's more these things happen in this life not the next so they can be verified! You can't make empty promises for 2000 years and hold a religion together. Look how fast people are abandoning the church once it started preaching empty prosperity doctrines. With in a generation it's been gutted. So again whether in False religion or under the care of God, it all boils down to what you are looking for. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)


