Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
December 21, 2015 at 11:48 pm
Yes, that's entirely accurate.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 3637
Threads: 20
Joined: July 20, 2011
Reputation:
47
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
December 21, 2015 at 11:58 pm
(December 21, 2015 at 11:33 pm)TheRealJoeFish Wrote: (December 21, 2015 at 10:43 pm)Beccs Wrote: I've been gone a week and this nonsense continues??
Yes, although I'd contend that the technical term would be festers
I might have gone with putrefies.
But since you were first with festers, I'll go along.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Posts: 18544
Threads: 145
Joined: March 18, 2015
Reputation:
100
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
December 22, 2015 at 12:06 am
Add to that the festering of the "atheism is a religion" post. Ugh.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work. If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now. Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
December 22, 2015 at 12:10 am
I wonder if the forum is allergic to penicillin?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 4238
Threads: 29
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
9
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
December 22, 2015 at 6:51 am
(December 21, 2015 at 8:11 am)Stimbo Wrote: We don't need to guess. It's blatantly obvious.
The consciousness is a product of the brain.........yeahhh...obvious.
The consciousness that we got we inherited from previous generation......yeah......obvious.
We only got the physical senses..........yeahhhhhhh......obvious.
The universe started with the big bang.....yeahhhh.........obvious.
When the body die is all over........yeahhhhhhhhh......obvious.
Posts: 3637
Threads: 20
Joined: July 20, 2011
Reputation:
47
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
December 22, 2015 at 7:10 pm
(December 22, 2015 at 6:51 am)Little Rik Wrote: (December 21, 2015 at 8:11 am)Stimbo Wrote: We don't need to guess. It's blatantly obvious.
The consciousness is a product of the brain.........yeahhh...obvious.
That's what the demonstrable, testable, repeatable, and most importantly, falsifiable evidence points to.
Quote:The consciousness that we got we inherited from previous generation......yeah......obvious.
If you are referring to inheritable traits, yes.
Quote:We only got the physical senses..........yeahhhhhhh......obvious.
Through the use of our intellect, we have extended those senses quite a bit with technology, but yes, the overwhelming mountains of evidence points to our 5 senses being the only ones we have.
If you believe you can demonstrate otherwise, apply for the James Randy $1,000,000 challenge and become rich and famous. Or donate the money.
Quote:The universe started with the big bang.....yeahhhh.........obvious.
That's what the demonstrable, testable, repeatable, and most importantly, falsifiable evidence points to.
But that is only the current state of our universe. It might have existed before the BB in a different state.
Quote:When the body die is all over........yeahhhhhhhhh......obvious.
That's what the demonstrable, testable, repeatable, and most importantly, falsifiable evidence points to.
If you believe you can demonstrate otherwise, apply for the James Randy $1,000,000 challenge and become rich and famous. Or donate the money.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
December 22, 2015 at 9:16 pm
(This post was last modified: December 22, 2015 at 9:16 pm by Cyberman.)
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 4238
Threads: 29
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
9
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
December 23, 2015 at 8:23 am
(December 22, 2015 at 7:10 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: (December 22, 2015 at 6:51 am)Little Rik Wrote: The consciousness is a product of the brain.........yeahhh...obvious.
That's what the demonstrable, testable, repeatable, and most importantly, falsifiable evidence points to.
Quote:The consciousness that we got we inherited from previous generation......yeah......obvious.
If you are referring to inheritable traits, yes.
Quote:We only got the physical senses..........yeahhhhhhh......obvious.
Through the use of our intellect, we have extended those senses quite a bit with technology, but yes, the overwhelming mountains of evidence points to our 5 senses being the only ones we have.
If you believe you can demonstrate otherwise, apply for the James Randy $1,000,000 challenge and become rich and famous. Or donate the money.
Quote:The universe started with the big bang.....yeahhhh.........obvious.
That's what the demonstrable, testable, repeatable, and most importantly, falsifiable evidence points to.
But that is only the current state of our universe. It might have existed before the BB in a different state.
Quote:When the body die is all over........yeahhhhhhhhh......obvious.
That's what the demonstrable, testable, repeatable, and most importantly, falsifiable evidence points to.
If you believe you can demonstrate otherwise, apply for the James Randy $1,000,000 challenge and become rich and famous. Or donate the money.
Evidence means 100% correct.
As we know so far you haven't reach the stage in which your statements are 100% correct so you can't really say that your statements are evidence.
A statements that come without solid evidence is better known as dogma.
Of course you can turn a dogma into truth once you are able to bring forward solid evidence.
So far you fail so we can keep your statements in the corral of dogma.
In the meantime the best thing to do is to take in consideration only what make sense
and your so called truth fail to do this but i will be back after work and point your failing one by one.
Have a good day.
Posts: 3463
Threads: 25
Joined: August 9, 2015
Reputation:
27
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
December 23, 2015 at 8:56 am
(December 23, 2015 at 8:23 am)Little Rik Wrote: (December 22, 2015 at 7:10 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: That's what the demonstrable, testable, repeatable, and most importantly, falsifiable evidence points to.
If you are referring to inheritable traits, yes.
Through the use of our intellect, we have extended those senses quite a bit with technology, but yes, the overwhelming mountains of evidence points to our 5 senses being the only ones we have.
If you believe you can demonstrate otherwise, apply for the James Randy $1,000,000 challenge and become rich and famous. Or donate the money.
That's what the demonstrable, testable, repeatable, and most importantly, falsifiable evidence points to.
But that is only the current state of our universe. It might have existed before the BB in a different state.
That's what the demonstrable, testable, repeatable, and most importantly, falsifiable evidence points to.
If you believe you can demonstrate otherwise, apply for the James Randy $1,000,000 challenge and become rich and famous. Or donate the money.
Evidence means 100% correct. wrong; Evidence is the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid, evidence can be faulty and misinterpreted.
As we know so far you haven't reach the stage in which your statements are 100% correct so you can't really say that your statements are evidence.
A statements that come without solid evidence is better known as dogma. wrong; Dogma is a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true, Statements that have no evidence are just rubbish or in the case of this thread, Each one of your posts.
Of course you can turn a dogma into truth once you are able to bring forward solid evidence.
So far you fail so we can keep your statements in the corral of dogma.
In the meantime the best thing to do is to take in consideration only what make sense Which is to worship the one true god FSM.
and your so called truth fail to do this but i will be back after work and point your failing one by one. I'm sure that' what you think your doing, but so far it's been a train wreck.
Have a good day.
Emphasis mine.
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming" -The Prophet Boiardi-
Conservative trigger warning.
Posts: 1314
Threads: 14
Joined: December 1, 2015
Reputation:
9
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
December 23, 2015 at 10:29 am
Mr. Hanky loves you!
|