I really couldn't care less what kind of contract people want to engage in, straight or gay, it's none of my business.

Quote:I oppose it, because pushing shit is all fucked up. Buch of freaks

So why is the act of pushing up shit a reason not to support gay marriage? Would these people not getting married somehow prevent them from pushing up shit?

Also, it seems that all the disgust over homosexuality is being directed at gay males and gay sex. What about lesbians? Are they equally disgusting and abnormal? I never hear anyone complain about female-on-female sex. Why the double standard?

you haven't heard some of our evangelists.

(February 19, 2011 at 11:16 am)OnlyNatural Wrote: Also, it seems that all the disgust over homosexuality is being directed at gay males and gay sex. What about lesbians? Are they equally disgusting and abnormal? I never hear anyone complain about female-on-female sex. Why the double standard?

What?? and deprive those sanctimonious heterosexual bigots something to wank over???

Hmmm Reallity check I am thinking.

(February 19, 2011 at 11:20 am)thesummerqueen Wrote: you haven't heard some of our evangelists.

Yeah, I can see how'd they be against homosexuality outright, because God doesn't like it.

But when a non-religious, non-believing person is against it? Then it becomes harder to justify why the primary focus is on the repulsiveness and immorality of two men having sex.

(February 19, 2011 at 11:16 am)OnlyNatural Wrote: Also, it seems that all the disgust over homosexuality is being directed at gay males and gay sex. What about lesbians? Are they equally disgusting and abnormal? I never hear anyone complain about female-on-female sex. Why the double standard?

Well, because. It's two Lesbians! Abnormal, yes. Disgusting? Why certainly not!

Seriously, I really think lesbian sex is acceptable only if video taped and shared over the internet. For free.
Or with the cutains open. Any other circumstance should be verboten.

---

(February 19, 2011 at 11:32 am)OnlyNatural Wrote: But when a non-religious, non-believing person is against it? Then it becomes harder to justify why the primary focus is on the repulsiveness and immorality of two men having sex.

Just fer the record:

I never said I was 'against' homosexuality. I just maintain it is a abnormal behavior. A perversion or a chemical imbalance.

Not "against" anything. And yes, it repulses me. Morality is subjective.

(February 19, 2011 at 6:55 pm)Dotard Wrote: I never said I was 'against' homosexuality. I just maintain it is a abnormal behavior. A perversion or a chemical imbalance.

I would have information from wiki that would prove you wrong but i can't find it right now

So i would leave you with this statement that you can only ignore if you think humanity is inferior to animals

Quote:In Scientific American Mind, scientist Emily V. Driscoll stated that homosexual and bisexual behavior is quite common in several species and that it fosters bonding: "The more homosexuality, the more peaceful the species". The article also stated: "Unlike most humans, however, individual animals generally cannot be classified as gay or straight: an animal that engages in a same-sex flirtation or partnership does not necessarily shun heterosexual encounters. Rather, many species seem to have ingrained homosexual tendencies that are a regular part of their society. That is, there are probably no strictly gay critters, just bisexual ones. Animals don't do sexual identity. They just do sex."[40]

if i find the other information later i will post it

It makes more sense that animals are mostly bisexual to me.

Three words for you.

Gay Muslim Wedding.

Check it out.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12486003

(February 20, 2011 at 5:42 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: Three words for you.

Gay Muslim Wedding.

Check it out.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12486003

I like the bit ...

Quote:We didn't need an ..Imam...just someone well versed in the Qur'an

So one does NOT NEED the clergy??? Interesting