(March 31, 2011 at 11:58 am)Emporion Wrote: Correct. Your sense of self is determined by neurochemical reactions in the brain. That is one entity. P(x) for all neurochemical reactions in the brain.
1 down 3 to go.

Ugh, this is utter nonsense. How the fuck are we supposed to guess what's going on in your loony brain?

(March 31, 2011 at 12:55 pm)theVOID Wrote:

(March 31, 2011 at 11:58 am)Emporion Wrote: Correct. Your sense of self is determined by neurochemical reactions in the brain. That is one entity. P(x) for all neurochemical reactions in the brain.
1 down 3 to go.

Ugh, this is utter nonsense. How the fuck are we supposed to guess what's going on in your loony brain?

One question answered, three more questions to answer hense 1 down 3 to go.

God physically exists as neurochemical reactions relating to the sense of self. He has expanded from a universal explanation in the early days to also the sense of self in the minds of people indoctrinated or not who believe the religious texts. Stimulate the sense of self modulus in the brain with a little electricity and boom! Out comes a religious experience on demand!

Oh dear

You're talking about the left/right brain phenomenon?

So "god" is a piece of neurochemical circuitry in the right hemosphere of the cerebral cortex than is contingent upon electrical activity?

In other words, it's a delusion.

Can you just make your point already?

(March 31, 2011 at 1:04 pm)Emporion Wrote: One question answered, three more questions to answer hense 1 down 3 to go.

God physically exists as neurochemical reactions relating to the sense of self. He has expanded from a universal explanation in the early days to also the sense of self in the minds of people indoctrinated or not who believe the religious texts. Stimulate the sense of self modulus in the brain with a little electricity and boom! Out comes a religious experience on demand!

For fuck's sake, what is the point of this riddle? We all know that a religious experience happens within certain people because they are willing to believe that natural processes or things they can't explain comes from a deity.

Now, stimulating the "sense of self modulus" (lol) with electricity creates an automatic religious experience! That, I did not know.

(March 30, 2011 at 11:24 pm)Emporion Wrote: I'm neither an atheist nor a believer nor a Ignostic. I'm a freethinker atheist. Go deeper into your mind. That is a clue.

You're not making any sense whatsoever. Perhaps in your own little delusional interpretation of reality you are the one-eyed man in this here kingdom of the blind, but as far as the rest of us are concerned your head is stuck up your own arse as you blatantly contradict yourself from the get-go.

(March 31, 2011 at 12:19 am)Emporion Wrote: ME personally am a freethinker aheist, not to be confused with just an atheist.

Which is as asinine as stating a train-spotting atheist is not to be confused with a bird-watching atheist when we are talking on the subject of belief, or lack of belief, in a deity or deities.

You do not get to conflate freethought with atheism no more than a theist does with theism, likewise you don't get to have your own working definition of atheism in the public domain when one is already in usage within the English language.

(March 31, 2011 at 12:36 pm)Emporion Wrote: Shell, you are wrong. Why are you posting in this thread?

You are very much mistaken if you honestly think you can dictate to other members whether they may participate in an active thread or not. Riddle or no fucking riddle.

I see some people are confused by my logic. Perhaps my riddle has a flaw of some kind. Where are you all getting lost?

Please be specific.

What is this thread i don't even...

Just make your fucking point!

Ok VOID.
Warning, major spoilers to the riddle.

---

(March 31, 2011 at 1:37 pm)Welsh cake Wrote:

(March 30, 2011 at 11:24 pm)Emporion Wrote: I'm neither an atheist nor a believer nor a Ignostic. I'm a freethinker atheist. Go deeper into your mind. That is a clue.

You're not making any sense whatsoever. Perhaps in your own little delusional interpretation of reality you are the one-eyed man in this here kingdom of the blind, but as far as the rest of us are concerned your head is stuck up your own arse as you blatantly contradict yourself from the get-go.

(March 31, 2011 at 12:19 am)Emporion Wrote: ME personally am a freethinker aheist, not to be confused with just an atheist.

Which is as asinine as stating a train-spotting atheist is not to be confused with a bird-watching atheist when we are talking on the subject of belief, or lack of belief, in a deity or deities.

You do not get to conflate freethought with atheism no more than a theist does with theism, likewise you don't get to have your own working definition of atheism in the public domain when one is already in usage within the English language.

(March 31, 2011 at 12:36 pm)Emporion Wrote: Shell, you are wrong. Why are you posting in this thread?

You are very much mistaken if you honestly think you can dictate to other members whether they may participate in an active thread or not. Riddle or no fucking riddle.

I think we are all past this point now. Go read my earlier posts.