Posts: 815
Threads: 4
Joined: June 2, 2016
Reputation:
12
RE: Let's see how many apologetics take the bait
July 10, 2016 at 8:42 am
(This post was last modified: July 10, 2016 at 8:43 am by madog.)
(July 10, 2016 at 8:37 am)Drich Wrote: No I think as with job, God simply removed the 'hedge of protection' He originally had around us, and we became targets if we did not follow God's law. Which as a result filtered believers from non believers.
Oh so believers are protected from germs? He created germs according to your book and they fuck xtians as much as atheists ..... and your God decided to warn against pig meat rather than tell people to wash their hands, boil the water and properly cook meat, etc?
Religion is the top shelf of the supernatural supermarket ... Madog
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Let's see how many apologetics take the bait
July 11, 2016 at 8:34 am
(July 10, 2016 at 8:42 am)madog Wrote: (July 10, 2016 at 8:37 am)Drich Wrote: No I think as with job, God simply removed the 'hedge of protection' He originally had around us, and we became targets if we did not follow God's law. Which as a result filtered believers from non believers.
Oh so believers are protected from germs? He created germs according to your book and they fuck xtians as much as atheists ..... and your God decided to warn against pig meat rather than tell people to wash their hands, boil the water and properly cook meat, etc?
Hey, stupid...
You are wandering off subject to try and make your point.
The question was asked of OT jews. NOT Christians. As the dietary restrictions applied to OT Jews and not Christians.
So, Yes back then OT Jews were not subject to the swine and other blood born disease or bacteria as their was a prohibition on consuming both. In an age without refrigeration, in a hot desert climate, where people did not know to they had to cook their food thoroughly to ensure transmission of disease. Yes followers of the OT dietary law were indeed subject to less 'sickness' than those who did not.
Posts: 815
Threads: 4
Joined: June 2, 2016
Reputation:
12
RE: Let's see how many apologetics take the bait
July 11, 2016 at 9:50 am
(July 11, 2016 at 8:34 am)Drich Wrote: (July 10, 2016 at 8:42 am)madog Wrote: Oh so believers are protected from germs? He created germs according to your book and they fuck xtians as much as atheists ..... and your God decided to warn against pig meat rather than tell people to wash their hands, boil the water and properly cook meat, etc?
Hey, stupid...
You are wandering off subject to try and make your point.
The question was asked of OT jews. NOT Christians. As the dietary restrictions applied to OT Jews and not Christians.
So, Yes back then OT Jews were not subject to the swine and other blood born disease or bacteria as their was a prohibition on consuming both. In an age without refrigeration, in a hot desert climate, where people did not know to they had to cook their food thoroughly to ensure transmission of disease. Yes followers of the OT dietary law were indeed subject to less 'sickness' than those who did not.
Hey shithead are you calling me stupid to cover the fact your reply evades the point I made? ....
So let me get this straight the OT God is a different God to the xtian God?
The same question applies, why didn't the OLD GOD decide to warn against pig meat rather than tell people to wash their hands, boil the water and properly cook meat, etc?
And why didn't the xtian REPLACEMENT GOD tell people to wash their hands, boil the water instead of ponsing around with parlour tricks?
Religion is the top shelf of the supernatural supermarket ... Madog
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Let's see how many apologetics take the bait
July 11, 2016 at 11:36 am
(July 11, 2016 at 9:50 am)madog Wrote: (July 11, 2016 at 8:34 am)Drich Wrote: Hey, stupid...
You are wandering off subject to try and make your point.
The question was asked of OT jews. NOT Christians. As the dietary restrictions applied to OT Jews and not Christians.
So, Yes back then OT Jews were not subject to the swine and other blood born disease or bacteria as their was a prohibition on consuming both. In an age without refrigeration, in a hot desert climate, where people did not know to they had to cook their food thoroughly to ensure transmission of disease. Yes followers of the OT dietary law were indeed subject to less 'sickness' than those who did not.
Hey shithead are you calling me stupid to cover the fact your reply evades the point I made? ....
So let me get this straight the OT God is a different God to the xtian God? Moron in a word:
YES
How do you not understand that there are differences between OT Judaism and NT Christianity? Chief among them are the dietary restrictions. OT Jews had to eat certain thing and avoid others while Christians in the book of acts specifically had this restriction lifted!
If all laws remain then their would be no difference between an OT jew and a Christian.
Quote:The same question applies, why didn't the OLD GOD decide to warn against pig meat rather than tell people to wash their hands, boil the water and properly cook meat, etc?
wash their hands with what?? dirt? and check the temp of the meat with what their smeckles? You do understand that God gave the law to moses while in the desert, before meat thermometers and 'palm olive' right?
Red meat is easy to identify when cook, (which is the prohibition about eating meat with blood in it) but white meat is not always easily identifiable which is why would have just been easier to ban it
Quote:And why didn't the xtian REPLACEMENT GOD tell people to wash their hands, boil the water instead of ponsing around with parlour tricks?
Because retard 2000 years ago boiling water was a big deal, and plus things like soap were not avaible to everyone so not everyone could obey the law...
Again in a situation like that a general prohibition is far easier than to require implements like pots soap when most people struggled just to feed themselves.
Do you often find yourself arguing against common sense? Or are you just blindly arguing the opposite of what I am saying no matter where it takes you or what you have to say???
Or do you just not understand that the culture these laws were given to were so vastly different than even the culture of the time of Christ that a ban on what you now consider food was the only way to ensure people did not die or spread disease from just eating it??
If you truly do not know then I will ease up on the name calling.
Posts: 10332
Threads: 31
Joined: April 3, 2015
Reputation:
64
RE: Let's see how many apologetics take the bait
July 11, 2016 at 12:07 pm
Still spreading that Christian love I see, Drich
Posts: 815
Threads: 4
Joined: June 2, 2016
Reputation:
12
RE: Let's see how many apologetics take the bait
July 11, 2016 at 12:47 pm
(July 11, 2016 at 11:36 am)Drich Wrote: (July 11, 2016 at 9:50 am)madog Wrote: Hey shithead are you calling me stupid to cover the fact your reply evades the point I made? ....
So let me get this straight the OT God is a different God to the xtian God? Moron in a word:
YES
How do you not understand that there are differences between OT Judaism and NT Christianity? Chief among them are the dietary restrictions. OT Jews had to eat certain thing and avoid others while Christians in the book of acts specifically had this restriction lifted!
If all laws remain then their would be no difference between an OT jew and a Christian.
Quote:The same question applies, why didn't the OLD GOD decide to warn against pig meat rather than tell people to wash their hands, boil the water and properly cook meat, etc?
wash their hands with what?? dirt? and check the temp of the meat with what their smeckles? You do understand that God gave the law to moses while in the desert, before meat thermometers and 'palm olive' right?
Red meat is easy to identify when cook, (which is the prohibition about eating meat with blood in it) but white meat is not always easily identifiable which is why would have just been easier to ban it
Quote:And why didn't the xtian REPLACEMENT GOD tell people to wash their hands, boil the water instead of ponsing around with parlour tricks?
Because retard 2000 years ago boiling water was a big deal, and plus things like soap were not avaible to everyone so not everyone could obey the law...
Again in a situation like that a general prohibition is far easier than to require implements like pots soap when most people struggled just to feed themselves.
Do you often find yourself arguing against common sense? Or are you just blindly arguing the opposite of what I am saying no matter where it takes you or what you have to say???
Or do you just not understand that the culture these laws were given to were so vastly different than even the culture of the time of Christ that a ban on what you now consider food was the only way to ensure people did not die or spread disease from just eating it??
If you truly do not know then I will ease up on the name calling.
Being called names by those of low intellect doesn't particularly phase me .... It just shows they have been rattled
I can pretty much roll this in a couple of points ..... Probably go right over your head ...
A) Your God created pigs prior to the NT, he didn't create new pigs after the OT, so what changed.
b) the cooking practices were not significantly changed after the OT,read back through your own rants and you will see you even confirm that.
Oh by the way, when did your God give the xtians the "meat thermometers and 'palm olive' " that allowed him to lift the ban on pork?
Religion is the top shelf of the supernatural supermarket ... Madog
Posts: 18544
Threads: 145
Joined: March 18, 2015
Reputation:
100
RE: Let's see how many apologetics take the bait
July 11, 2016 at 3:34 pm
So nice to see a derogatory term like "retard" has been used in my thread. Especially when many of you know how I feel about that word.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work. If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now. Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Posts: 5466
Threads: 36
Joined: November 10, 2014
Reputation:
53
RE: Let's see how many apologetics take the bait
July 11, 2016 at 3:41 pm
(July 11, 2016 at 3:34 pm)Nymphadora Wrote: So nice to see a derogatory term like "retard" has been used in my thread. Especially when many of you know how I feel about that word.
$5 that Drich takes the low road and attempts to justify his use of that word instead of, you know, acting like the Christian he professes to be.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Posts: 550
Threads: 23
Joined: January 25, 2016
Reputation:
12
RE: Let's see how many apologetics take the bait
July 12, 2016 at 8:39 pm
(July 11, 2016 at 3:41 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: (July 11, 2016 at 3:34 pm)Nymphadora Wrote: So nice to see a derogatory term like "retard" has been used in my thread. Especially when many of you know how I feel about that word.
$5 that Drich takes the low road and attempts to justify his use of that word instead of, you know, acting like the Christian he professes to be.
Drich justifies the use of that word every time he opens his mouth.
Jesus is like Pinocchio. He's the bastard son of a carpenter. And a liar. And he wishes he was real.
Posts: 67313
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Let's see how many apologetics take the bait
July 13, 2016 at 6:14 pm
(July 10, 2016 at 8:37 am)Drich Wrote: No I think as with job, God simply removed the 'hedge of protection' He originally had around us, and we became targets if we did not follow God's law. Which as a result filtered believers from non believers.
Good thing you're vaccinated then, eh?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
|