(August 19, 2016 at 8:10 am)Alex K Wrote:

(August 19, 2016 at 8:08 am)Excited Penguin Wrote: Ok, there, Dr. Freud. It's just a statue.

It's a naked statue with a purposely small penis. 

Most of them are, purposely or otherwise....which is a fact that becomes apparent when you get more than the three foot of distance between your own penis and your eyes...for example..by stepping back and looking at a statue.  

I mean, I'm looking at that statue and honestly...I've seen alot of similar peen.  Besides, there appears to be a correlation between how small it is flacid, and it;s relative enormity when gorged.  The low hung dong is usually not much bigger when erect.

I also have to mention...that at least the statue has man-sized (frankly, enormous) hands......

You googled that?

For god sakes why?

Lmao. I now need bleach for my eyes. What has been seen cannot be unseen.

(August 19, 2016 at 8:14 am)Atheist_BG Wrote: They have forgotten to add an underage kid to go with the statue. He "smells" like an old pedophile from a mile away. Not to mention the fact that the percentage of convicted for child abuse republicunts ain't small at all and keeps growing. To some people that party is a synonym of pedophilia.

What? Seriously? Look, I disagree with the Republicans as much as the next guy, but this was just an astonishingly stupid comment.

(August 19, 2016 at 8:07 am)Alex K Wrote: Blasphemy? What are you talking about?

I didn't stutter. In the west citizens do not owe religious people or politicians or celebrities taboos. Especially not religion or politicians in seats of power. "Blasphemy" is simply another subset of a demand not to "offend a power". What "dignity" has he been showing others for the past year? When a politician talks like him, it is no longer typical mudslinging, it is demagoguery and that is toxic to a civil west. 

Trump does not get to play victim, nor do we owe any of his vile comments over the past year any "dignity".  Do not equate what he has done to someone responding to him as being the same. The issue is his position, not free speech itself.

(August 18, 2016 at 4:46 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: At least now we can put to rest the rumors that Melania was just after his money.

Right.  She obvious has some kind of masochist thing going too.

(August 19, 2016 at 8:41 am)Brian37 Wrote:

(August 19, 2016 at 8:07 am)Alex K Wrote: Blasphemy? What are you talking about?

I didn't stutter. In the west citizens do not owe religious people or politicians or celebrities taboos. Especially not religion or politicians in seats of power. "Blasphemy" is simply another subset of a demand not to "offend a power". What "dignity" has he been showing others for the past year? When a politician talks like him, it is no longer typical mudslinging, it is demagoguery and that is toxic to a civil west. 

Trump does not get to play victim, nor do we owe any of his vile comments over the past year any "dignity".  Do not equate what he has done to someone responding to him as being the same. The issue is his position, not free speech itself.

So it is eye for an eye after all. If he doesn't respect the dignity of others, you say he doesn't get any.

(August 19, 2016 at 8:48 am)Alex K Wrote:

(August 19, 2016 at 8:41 am)Brian37 Wrote: I didn't stutter. In the west citizens do not owe religious people or politicians or celebrities taboos. Especially not religion or politicians in seats of power. "Blasphemy" is simply another subset of a demand not to "offend a power". What "dignity" has he been showing others for the past year? When a politician talks like him, it is no longer typical mudslinging, it is demagoguery and that is toxic to a civil west. 

Trump does not get to play victim, nor do we owe any of his vile comments over the past year any "dignity".  Do not equate what he has done to someone responding to him as being the same. The issue is his position, not free speech itself.

So it is eye for an eye after all. If he doesn't respect the dignity of others, you say he doesn't get any.

Will you knock it off. NO IT IS NOT ....... He is in a position of power and politicians should not be behaving like that. Do not equate me to him. Responding to a demagogue does not make one a demagogue.

(August 19, 2016 at 8:14 am)Atheist_BG Wrote:

(August 18, 2016 at 4:40 pm)Brian37 Wrote: MY EYES MY EYES..........BUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

https://www.google.com/search?q=Naked+St...EQ_AUIBigB

They have forgotten to add an underage kid to go with the statue. He "smells" like an old pedophile from a mile away. Not to mention the fact that the percentage of convicted for child abuse republicunts ain't small at all and keeps growing. To some people that party is a synonym of pedophilia.

This is just fucking laughable.

(August 19, 2016 at 8:10 am)Alex K Wrote: It's a naked statue with a purposely small penis.

Most of all, it's got no balls.

(August 18, 2016 at 10:52 pm)Tres Leches Wrote:

(August 18, 2016 at 5:11 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: I don't have a problem with the naked Donald Statue, I think it's funny. I also don't have a problem with him calling Rosie O'Donnell a fat pig. If you think Donald Trump is too crude and yet think a naked statue is fine, I have an article for you to read:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy

Grump has the right to say whatever he wants about Rosie O'Donnell, true. But he or anyone else doesn't have the right to be protected from any negative blow-back or backlash to his ill-mannered comments. If Grump wants to tweet inflammatory opinions, no one's stopping him but he'd better not cry when someone then makes a naked statue of his sorry-looking ass.

Thank you. I get really irritated by anyone, left or right whom fail to understand the difference between legal and moral. If we value our ability to criticize any political or religious leader, then we also have to understand why Trump is dangerous, and not  matter of law, but as a matter of position. It is bad enough he has said all the scapegoating bullshit he has the past year, but to dare suggest he is a victim himself is absurd. North Korea is what you end up with when politicians seek to silence dissent. Theocracies like Iran and Saudi Arabia are what you end up with when religion demands taboos. 



Trump's language is a matter of position, not legality. Just because you have the right to staple your nuts to the wall does not make it a responsible choice. Those responding to it are within their rights to call him on his very dangerous and irresponsible tactics. Blasphemy of Trump is not the same as his scapegoating demagoguery. He deserves all the ridicule and scorn as a despot rightfully gets. If he doesn't want to be a target, then he shouldn't behave like one. 

If Trump wants to shock people for ratings, he should have stuck to cable TV. In politics it isn't about shitting on people for shock value. In the civil west all parties involved should be about peaceful transfer of power, and while politics in the west does get messy, it should never get to the point of eroding that concept. 

After all the vile shit he has said this past year, to ask me to feel one bit sorry for him is absurd. No I don't want him dead one bit, but I do want enough people blasting him verbally to not only keep him out of office, but to send a message to all politicians who might consider his tactics to garner a win at any level, that scapegoating demagoguery is unacceptable and dangerous. 

Nobody should expect a society where we never offend anyone, but in politics you don't use his tactics, it is irresponsible.