"PGJ" doesn't actually stand for "Programming God Jordan" it actually stands for "Poe Gets Jaunty".

@ OP:
Lmao... learn to use quote tags correctly (see page 21). And stop assuming people who differ in their opinions are theists. Sorry, again, you don't get to tell people what they think or feel or believe because you are not them.

Wash, rinse, repeat.

/thread.

(November 7, 2016 at 11:43 pm)Nymphadora Wrote: @ OP:
Lmao... learn to use quote tags correctly (see page 21). And stop assuming people who differ in their opinions are theists. Sorry, again, you don't get to tell people what they think or feel or believe because you are not them.

Wash, rinse, repeat.

/thread.

Shall one stipulate strings of disregard [that ignore internationally scientifically observable statistics] said speaker is likely of theistic nature, for theists  tend to ignore scientific evidence.

Separately, via page 21, I had approached several streams of expressions of sillily attributed arguments [individually], in tandem with user Jormungandr.

---

(November 7, 2016 at 11:07 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: "PGJ" doesn't actually stand for "Programming God Jordan" it actually stands for "Poe Gets Jaunty".

JAUNTY BEHAVIOUR is but irrelevant. (..for I simply state statistics).

LEMMA OF MINE:

(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particular abound Trigonometric Integration]


(1) I have composed non trivial models, SAMPLE: (utilizing residual neural network) for heart irregularity detection. (Deriving 76/500+ via international kaggle scale) {{See '
EJECTION-FRACTION-IRREGULARITY-DETECTION-MODEL.'}}

(2) A.... n fold orthographic quasicrystal-structured neural network scan behaviour pattern routine that manifests as a new type of tri dimensional artificial intelligence scan behaviour algorithm. {{See 'MORPHING-SOMATIC-QUASICRYSTAL-NEURAL-NETWORK'}}


(3) Hypothesis/Initial Implementation of non trivial general neural fabric, {{on the horizon of deep reinforcement learning, mathematics qua quantum** computing, and causal learning (uetorch tower blocks)}} See 'THOUGHT CURVATURE'.

'quantum' Is highlighted, as an erratum.



Query:
Alasdair , perhaps it is exigent that you express your most profound lemma.

(November 7, 2016 at 7:12 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Mathilda, perhaps it is exigent that you express your most profound lemma.

This Lemma is most profound

This dude has already made 96 posts?

Oh God. They're all the fucking same apart from a few photos.

Shame on you, PGJ, for implicating Morgan Freeman in your lunacy. Even he couldn't sell this shit.

(November 8, 2016 at 3:02 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: Shame on you, PGJ, for implicating Morgan Freeman in your lunacy. Even he couldn't sell this shit.

[*A*]

Perhaps it is exigent that you fulfill the facing exercise:

Stipulate one opinionated stipulation of mine.

Alternatively, it is perhaps pertinent that this thread is terminated, for there exists solely, narrow [intelligence] responders, on the boundary of sillily postulated expressions of said responders. 






[*B*]




LEMMA OF MINE:

(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particular abound Trigonometric Integration]


(1) I have composed non trivial models, SAMPLE: (utilizing residual neural network) for heart irregularity detection. (Deriving 76/500+ via international kaggle scale) {{See '
EJECTION-FRACTION-IRREGULARITY-DETECTION-MODEL.'}}



(2) A.... n fold orthographic quasicrystal-structured neural network scan behaviour pattern routine that manifests as a new type of tri dimensional artificial intelligence scan behaviour algorithm. {{See 'MORPHING-SOMATIC-QUASICRYSTAL-NEURAL-NETWORK'}}



(3) Hypothesis/Initial Implementation of non trivial general neural fabric, {{on the horizon of deep reinforcement learning, mathematics qua quantum computing, and causal learning (uetorch tower blocks)}} See 'THOUGHT CURVATURE'.










Queries:
Have you not any scientific awareness, beyond trivial [apparently elementary education-aligned] scope? 
Have you not any sensible responses, beyond blather?

Nope.

Huh. He asks for a lemma. I gave him a lemma.

So, I think we can conclude that computer programmers do not become gods. No matter how big they make their letters or their pectorals.