Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 13, 2024, 8:41 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
"PGJ" doesn't actually stand for "Programming God Jordan" it actually stands for "Poe Gets Jaunty".
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
@ OP:
Lmao... learn to use quote tags correctly (see page 21). And stop assuming people who differ in their opinions are theists. Sorry, again, you don't get to tell people what they think or feel or believe because you are not them.

Wash, rinse, repeat.

/thread.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 7, 2016 at 11:43 pm)Nymphadora Wrote: @ OP:
Lmao... learn to use quote tags correctly (see page 21). And stop assuming people who differ in their opinions are theists. Sorry, again, you don't get to tell people what they think or feel or believe because you are not them.

Wash, rinse, repeat.

/thread.

Shall one stipulate strings of disregard [that ignore internationally scientifically observable statistics] said speaker is likely of theistic nature, for theists  tend to ignore scientific evidence.

Separately, via page 21, I had approached several streams of expressions of sillily attributed arguments [individually], in tandem with user Jormungandr.

(November 7, 2016 at 11:07 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: "PGJ" doesn't actually stand for "Programming God Jordan" it actually stands for "Poe Gets Jaunty".

JAUNTY BEHAVIOUR is but irrelevant. (..for I simply state statistics).

LEMMA OF MINE:

(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particular abound Trigonometric Integration]


(1) I have composed non trivial models, SAMPLE: (utilizing residual neural network) for heart irregularity detection. (Deriving 76/500+ via international kaggle scale) {{See '
EJECTION-FRACTION-IRREGULARITY-DETECTION-MODEL.'}}

(2) A.... n fold orthographic quasicrystal-structured neural network scan behaviour pattern routine that manifests as a new type of tri dimensional artificial intelligence scan behaviour algorithm. {{See 'MORPHING-SOMATIC-QUASICRYSTAL-NEURAL-NETWORK'}}


(3) Hypothesis/Initial Implementation of non trivial general neural fabric, {{on the horizon of deep reinforcement learning, mathematics qua quantum** computing, and causal learning (uetorch tower blocks)}} See 'THOUGHT CURVATURE'.


'quantum' Is highlighted, as an erratum.



Query:
Alasdair , perhaps it is exigent that you express your most profound lemma.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist
(November 7, 2016 at 7:12 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Mathilda, perhaps it is exigent that you express your most profound lemma.

This Lemma is most profound


Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
This dude has already made 96 posts?

Oh God. They're all the fucking same apart from a few photos.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
Shame on you, PGJ, for implicating Morgan Freeman in your lunacy. Even he couldn't sell this shit.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 8, 2016 at 3:02 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: Shame on you, PGJ, for implicating Morgan Freeman in your lunacy. Even he couldn't sell this shit.

[*A*]

Perhaps it is exigent that you fulfill the facing exercise:


Stipulate one opinionated stipulation of mine.

Alternatively, it is perhaps pertinent that this thread is terminated, for there exists solely, narrow [intelligence] responders, on the boundary of sillily postulated expressions of said responders. 






[*B*]




LEMMA OF MINE:

(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particular abound Trigonometric Integration]


(1) I have composed non trivial models, SAMPLE: (utilizing residual neural network) for heart irregularity detection. (Deriving 76/500+ via international kaggle scale) {{See '
EJECTION-FRACTION-IRREGULARITY-DETECTION-MODEL.'}}




(2) A.... n fold orthographic quasicrystal-structured neural network scan behaviour pattern routine that manifests as a new type of tri dimensional artificial intelligence scan behaviour algorithm. {{See 'MORPHING-SOMATIC-QUASICRYSTAL-NEURAL-NETWORK'}}



(3) Hypothesis/Initial Implementation of non trivial general neural fabric, {{on the horizon of deep reinforcement learning, mathematics qua quantum computing, and causal learning (uetorch tower blocks)}} See 'THOUGHT CURVATURE'.










Queries:
Have you not any scientific awareness, beyond trivial [apparently elementary education-aligned] scope? 
Have you not any sensible responses, beyond blather?
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
Nope.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
Huh. He asks for a lemma. I gave him a lemma.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
So, I think we can conclude that computer programmers do not become gods. No matter how big they make their letters or their pectorals.
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!






Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proof and evidence will always equal Science zwanzig 103 9903 December 17, 2021 at 5:31 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Young more likely to pray than over-55s - survey zebo-the-fat 16 2136 September 28, 2021 at 5:44 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Is God weaker than theists imagine, and is mankind stronger? invalid 6 2629 March 5, 2021 at 6:38 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Are miracles evidence of the existence of God? ido 74 6681 July 24, 2020 at 12:59 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Muslim students less likely to be awarded top class degrees. Succubus#2 28 3126 March 22, 2020 at 6:02 am
Last Post: Belacqua
  Religious fundamentalists more likely to believe fake news OakTree500 30 4786 November 10, 2018 at 4:32 pm
Last Post: no one
  If theists understood "evidence" Silver 135 16891 October 10, 2018 at 10:50 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Moses parting the sea evidence or just made up Smain 12 3382 June 28, 2018 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Are introverts less likely to like organised religion? Der/die AtheistIn 8 1580 March 22, 2018 at 11:13 pm
Last Post: GODZILLA
  Can religion be a type of Stockholm syndrome? ignoramus 5 2978 June 10, 2017 at 9:54 am
Last Post: Cyberman



Users browsing this thread: 80 Guest(s)