(June 30, 2017 at 4:55 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: And then they encountered a three headed knight. A castle of horny maidens .A crazy old man who part time guards a bridge of certain death. And a group of knights who have weaponized obscure sayings respectively.

Tell me again how sheep’s bladders my be utilized to prevent earthquakes?

Quote:It's strange that a person would wave their credentials around without actually presenting any evidence of them.

Nope only strange if you demand said evidence as a lame attempt at discrediting someone. As a distraction from your ass being thoroughly kicked . And you having axe to grind against the kicker. Or are you just pouty Alex won't waste time on you.

(June 30, 2017 at 5:00 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

Quote:It's strange that a person would wave their credentials around without actually presenting any evidence of them.

Well, it depends on where one lives.  For example, I'm within 500m of a school, so waving my credentials in public might get me arrested.

Boru

Any aunties present?

The aunties tend to cheer.

Boru

Mano, get your ass back here so we may taunt you a second time-er.

Your moser was your faser and your 'amster smelt of elderberries! You 'eard me!

You tiny brained whopper of other peoples bottoms

---

Back to the physics for a sec . Now of course some point out that we still see singularities in some quantum and non classical models . But once again is that an actual singularity or once again a break down our understanding .

(June 30, 2017 at 5:12 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:

Quote:It's strange that a person would wave their credentials around without actually presenting any evidence of them.

Nope only strange if you demand said evidence as a lame attempt at discrediting someone. As a distraction from your ass being thoroughly kicked . And you having axe to grind against the kicker. Or are you just pouty Alex won't waste time on you.

Alex revealed his ignorance in this thread; that's an irrefutable fact. I revealed that he doesn't understand what a singularity is by merely quoting a few statements of his that contradicted each other. These statements also implied that he didn't know that the Big Bang is considered a singularity by many cosmologists. In fact, it's called big bang singularity or initial singularity. How the fuck would a trained physicist not know that? It's one thing to say, "Yes, some cosmologists believe the big bang was a singularity" but his statement was more in the lines of "singularity at the big bang? what do you mean?"

And instead of rebutting what I wrote, Alex name called and gave up, and then his retard/sock puppet brigade started chiming into the thread at full force, claiming that Alex is a physicist, and how dare I say he doesn't know what he's talking about when I irrefutably demonstrated that he doesn't.

This response by the forum prompted me to ask for proof that Alex is a physicist, which would be extremely easy for him to produce. But he's decided not to do that and has instead opted to stand on the sidelines with his retard/sock puppet brigade to chuck sticks and rocks while talking about Monty Python. The guy's a joke.

But who are you guys fooling with this? The retard/sock puppet brigade is clearly a lost cause. Completely brain dead. And Alex knows he's a fraud.

---

(June 30, 2017 at 5:31 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: You tiny brained whopper of other peoples bottoms

---

Back to the physics for a sec . Now of course some point out that we still see singularities in some quantum and non classical models . But once again is that an actual singularity or once again a break down our understanding .

So you're going to go by Alex, some anonymous guy who claims he's a physicist who is unwilling to provide proof that he's a physicist, over Stephen Hawking, a person you know to be a physicist and a good one at that? Yeah, there's something wrong with your brain, bro.

"At this time, the Big Bang, all the matter in the universe, would have been on top of itself. The density would have been infinite. It would have been what is called, a singularity. At a singularity, all the laws of physics would have broken down."

Again, the mind boggles. What a community of nitwits.

(June 30, 2017 at 5:58 pm)ManofYesterday Wrote:

(June 30, 2017 at 5:12 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Nope only strange if you demand said evidence as a lame attempt at discrediting someone. As a distraction from your ass being thoroughly kicked . And you having axe to grind against the kicker. Or are you just pouty Alex won't waste time on you.

Alex revealed his ignorance in this thread; that's an irrefutable fact. I revealed that he doesn't understand what a singularity is by merely quoting a few statements of his that contradicted each other. These statements also implied that he didn't know that the Big Bang is considered a singularity by many cosmologists. In fact, it's called big bang singularity or initial singularity. How the fuck would a trained physicist not know that? It's one thing to say, "Yes, some cosmologists believe the big bang was a singularity" but his statement was more in the lines of "singularity at the big bang? what do you mean?"

And instead of rebutting what I wrote, Alex name called and gave up, and then his retard/sock puppet brigade started chiming into the thread at full force, claiming that Alex is a physicist, and how dare I say he doesn't know what he's talking about when I irrefutably demonstrated that he doesn't.

This response by the forum prompted me to ask for proof that Alex is a physicist, which would be extremely easy for him to produce. But he's decided not to do that and has instead opted to stand on the sidelines with his retard/sock puppet brigade to chuck sticks and rocks while talking about Monty Python. The guy's a joke.

But who are you guys fooling with this? The retard/sock puppet brigade is clearly a lost cause. Completely brain dead. And Alex knows he's a fraud.

---

(June 30, 2017 at 5:31 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: You tiny brained whopper of other peoples bottoms

---

Back to the physics for a sec . Now of course some point out that we still see singularities in some quantum and non classical models . But once again is that an actual singularity or once again a break down our understanding .

So you're going to go by Alex, some anonymous guy who claims he's a physicist who is unwilling to provide proof that he's a physicist, over Stephen Hawking?

"At this time, the Big Bang, all the matter in the universe, would have been on top of itself. The density would have been infinite. It would have been what is called, a singularity. At a singularity, all the laws of physics would have broken down."

Again, the mind boggles. What a community of nitwits.

Look, Mano, give over asking Alex for proof of his career. I mean, no one here is asking you to prove that you clean public bogs for a living, are they?

Boru

(June 30, 2017 at 6:09 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(June 30, 2017 at 5:58 pm)ManofYesterday Wrote: Alex revealed his ignorance in this thread; that's an irrefutable fact. I revealed that he doesn't understand what a singularity is by merely quoting a few statements of his that contradicted each other. These statements also implied that he didn't know that the Big Bang is considered a singularity by many cosmologists. In fact, it's called big bang singularity or initial singularity. How the fuck would a trained physicist not know that? It's one thing to say, "Yes, some cosmologists believe the big bang was a singularity" but his statement was more in the lines of "singularity at the big bang? what do you mean?"

And instead of rebutting what I wrote, Alex name called and gave up, and then his retard/sock puppet brigade started chiming into the thread at full force, claiming that Alex is a physicist, and how dare I say he doesn't know what he's talking about when I irrefutably demonstrated that he doesn't.

This response by the forum prompted me to ask for proof that Alex is a physicist, which would be extremely easy for him to produce. But he's decided not to do that and has instead opted to stand on the sidelines with his retard/sock puppet brigade to chuck sticks and rocks while talking about Monty Python. The guy's a joke.

But who are you guys fooling with this? The retard/sock puppet brigade is clearly a lost cause. Completely brain dead. And Alex knows he's a fraud.

---

So you're going to go by Alex, some anonymous guy who claims he's a physicist who is unwilling to provide proof that he's a physicist, over Stephen Hawking?

"At this time, the Big Bang, all the matter in the universe, would have been on top of itself. The density would have been infinite. It would have been what is called, a singularity. At a singularity, all the laws of physics would have broken down."

Again, the mind boggles. What a community of nitwits.

Look, Mano, give over asking Alex for proof of his career.  I mean, no one here is asking you to prove that you clean public bogs for a living, are they?

Boru

It would be very embarrassing for you if I did do that for a living, but I'm actually a Computer Scientist. Also, that's very elitist of you. Do you hate poor people and blue collar workers? Ironically, I bet you're a blue collar worker yourself.