Rik, the reference in your Wikipedia link points to a church website. Not good enough. Got anything from a peer-reviewed historical journal?

Evidence, little rikki shithead, evidence.  I don't give a flying fuck about church traditions.  Prove your point or fuck off.

(September 25, 2017 at 10:58 am)Minimalist Wrote: Evidence, little rikki shithead, evidence.  I don't give a flying fuck about church traditions.  Prove your point or fuck off.

Imbecile.  

From historical evidences,
we can rightly conclude that the origin of Malabar Christianity is not from Thomas, the
Manichaen, Thomas of Canai or Nestorian missionaries, but from Apostle Thomas, in the
first century itself. The age-old consciousness of the community of St. Thomas Christians,
that their origin of Christians is from the mission of St. Thomas the Apostle in India stands
sufficiently justified.

http://www.baselius.ac.in/wp-content/upl...UMMARY.pdf

Did you read your own paper, dickwad?

Quote:Authority for the St. Thomas tradition of Kerala Christianity, i.e. its historicity, is a
matter of dispute among the historians, to a great extent, for want of sufficient, direct
archaeological evidences or backing of contemporary written documents. There are a good
number of Historians and writers, from all over the world, are questioning the Indian
apostolate of St.Thomas and the validity of the arguments of its proponents. There is no
contemporary evidence showing that Thomas had been in the subcontinent,

Try to get it through your thick fucking head that we have no evidence that jesusism even existed in fucking Rome in the mid first century.... let alone fucking India.

https://www.quora.com/Did-St-Thomas-real...e-to-India

Quote:As I have listed above, all the three main claims made by Christians in Kerala about the presence of St.Thomas here between C.E 52–72 are contradicted by historical facts . So either , he has never come here and even if he has , he could not have done what current Christians believe he has done. My personal opinion is that based on historical evidence, the chances that St.Thomas would have visited Kerala in C.E 52 is almost nil.

Fuck you.


Your next problem is to demonstrate that there was a "St Thomas" at all.  As there is no evidence for fucking jesus it naturally means that he didn't need any Merry Men, either.

(September 25, 2017 at 10:29 am)Little Rik Wrote: Actually I haven't got time to read the Bible.  

Can you please tell me what the Bible say?    

Lot of sex, lot of violence, something about shrimp. That's pretty much it.

you left out the rules regarding menstruation . . .

I didn't want to confuse him with a four-syllable word. He has enough trouble with single ones.

It's pretty important to the Lord God Almighty. I hate to see Him pissed off over a bloody tampon turning up clogging the church toilet after services . .

Should have said it was a vampire's teabag, like I... don't.

Ewwww . . . .