I think of the opposition as being the one of two:

1-For true reasons
2-For just forcing constraints on minorities

For 1, the reasons must be listed: In the Quran, the prophet Lot who preached against the act listed these reasons:

Quote:Sura 7, The Quran:
( 80 )   And [We had sent] Lot when he said to his people, "Do you commit such immorality as no one has preceded you with from among the worlds?
( 81 )   Indeed, you approach men with desire, instead of women. Rather, you are a extravagant people."

In another Sura; Lot is quoted:

Quote:Sura 27, The Quran:
( 54 )   And [mention] Lot, when he said to his people, "Do you commit immorality while you are seeing?
( 55 )   Do you indeed approach men with desire instead of women? Rather, you are a people behaving ignorantly."

My analysis for the verses, is that male-to male relationships are leaving women without mates. In other words; homosexuality is destroying the natural cycle we know between men and women's mating.

It's not a genetic problem; isolate men in a place without mates for enough time, and they'll have sex with each other in no time. Prisons are known for that.

That's my opinion: homsexuality is extravagant in terms of sexuality, destructive too to the natural cycle that all of us resulted from.

Then comes number 2: which is ignorant people who are high in their pussy-loving, who just pose as historical dicks forcing constraints on minorities.

(December 18, 2017 at 12:56 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: I think of the opposition as being the one of two:

1-For true reasons
2-For just forcing constraints on minorities

For 1, the reasons must be listed: In the Quran, the prophet Lot who preached against the act listed these reasons:

Quote:Sura 7, The Quran:
( 80 )   And [We had sent] Lot when he said to his people, "Do you commit such immorality as no one has preceded you with from among the worlds?
( 81 )   Indeed, you approach men with desire, instead of women. Rather, you are a extravagant people."

In another Sura; Lot is quoted:

Quote:Sura 27, The Quran:
( 54 )   And [mention] Lot, when he said to his people, "Do you commit immorality while you are seeing?
( 55 )   Do you indeed approach men with desire instead of women? Rather, you are a people behaving ignorantly."

My analysis for the verses, is that male-to male relationships are leaving women without mates. In other words; homosexuality is destroying the natural cycle we know between men and women's mating.

It's not a genetic problem; isolate men in a place without mates for enough time, and they'll have sex with each other in no time. Prisons are known for that.

That's my opinion: homsexuality is extravagant in terms of sexuality, destructive too to the natural cycle that all of us resulted from.

Then comes number 2: which is ignorant people who are high in their pussy-loving, who just pose as historical dicks forcing constraints on minorities.

The sign said, "We Hire Happy People".

It's that kind of discrimination that keeps me unemployed.

(December 18, 2017 at 12:56 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: My analysis for the verses, is that male-to male relationships are leaving women without mates. In other words; homosexuality is destroying the natural cycle we know between men and women's mating.

Will no one think of Teh Ladiez!?!

The authors of magic book were predictably weirded out by the gay stuff (but probably not the lezzi stuff..you see...there's a difference.......).  That's the whole reason, grandiose fantasies-as-analysis aside.  

Quote:That's my opinion: homsexuality is extravagant in terms of sexuality, destructive too to the natural cycle that all of us resulted from.

Will no one think of Teh Cycle!?!

Quote:Then comes number 2: which is ignorant people who are high in their pussy-loving, who just pose as historical dicks forcing constraints on minorities.

It's all #2 in magic book, Atlas.  A big steaming pile of it, in fact. 

(December 20, 2017 at 10:52 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:

(December 19, 2017 at 2:18 am)Godscreated Wrote:  Just because self promoting scientist want to claim a thing doesn't mean it's true. Until someone proves new information can be added to DNA without the manipulation of man then evolution is dead and it will stay that way.

GC

Information in this context doesn’t mean what you think it means, you gullible ignorant little man.

 I know exactly what it means, unlike you I've looked at both sides and found evolution lacking in truth and honesty.

GC

(December 20, 2017 at 3:46 pm)Khemikal Wrote:

(December 18, 2017 at 12:56 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: My analysis for the verses, is that male-to male relationships are leaving women without mates. In other words; homosexuality is destroying the natural cycle we know between men and women's mating.

Will no one think of Teh Ladiez!?!

I am always thinking of Teh Ladiezs. My eldest is transgender. I lost a daughter and gained a son. Christians of every stripe want to butcher him/her and me for being supportive. My perspective is that they can all go die in a fire.