Why are most religions agains homosexuality?

[WinterHold]

I think of the opposition as being the one of two:

1-For true reasons
2-For just forcing constraints on minorities

For 1, the reasons must be listed: In the Quran, the prophet Lot who preached against the act listed these reasons:

Sura 7, The Quran:
( 80 )   And [We had sent] Lot when he said to his people, "Do you commit such immorality as no one has preceded you with from among the worlds?
( 81 )   Indeed, you approach men with desire, instead of women. Rather, you are a extravagant people."

In another Sura; Lot is quoted:

Sura 27, The Quran:
( 54 )   And [mention] Lot, when he said to his people, "Do you commit immorality while you are seeing?
( 55 )   Do you indeed approach men with desire instead of women? Rather, you are a people behaving ignorantly."

My analysis for the verses, is that male-to male relationships are leaving women without mates. In other words; homosexuality is destroying the natural cycle we know between men and women's mating.

It's not a genetic problem; isolate men in a place without mates for enough time, and they'll have sex with each other in no time. Prisons are known for that.

That's my opinion: homsexuality is extravagant in terms of sexuality, destructive too to the natural cycle that all of us resulted from.

Then comes number 2: which is ignorant people who are high in their pussy-loving, who just pose as historical dicks forcing constraints on minorities.

[Godscreated]

 Biological evolution is false, it hasn't been proven not even close.

 What's sad is you believing there's evidence of biological evolution, especially since it was started as an assumption and the story grew from that assumption without evidence.

GC

---

 Biological evolution is false, it hasn't been proven not even close. I have a consistent view point that holds true to the scriptures, I have no idea what you are rambling about.

GC

Biological is a proven fact. But I guess you will never accept that despite all the times you are shown the evidence.

Here you go. Learn why you are wrong.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...eationist/

 I saw no evidence let lone proof of biological evolution, and as for the Galapagos Islands to be isolated is a false statement. It has been recorded that main land birds have been flying there so that shoots down your isolated environment. That's just one example. No evidence exists that new information has ever been added to DNA and that of course means no new kinds.

GC

[Haipule]

I think of the opposition as being the one of two:

1-For true reasons
2-For just forcing constraints on minorities

For 1, the reasons must be listed: In the Quran, the prophet Lot who preached against the act listed these reasons:

Sura 7, The Quran:
( 80 )   And [We had sent] Lot when he said to his people, "Do you commit such immorality as no one has preceded you with from among the worlds?
( 81 )   Indeed, you approach men with desire, instead of women. Rather, you are a extravagant people."

In another Sura; Lot is quoted:

Sura 27, The Quran:
( 54 )   And [mention] Lot, when he said to his people, "Do you commit immorality while you are seeing?
( 55 )   Do you indeed approach men with desire instead of women? Rather, you are a people behaving ignorantly."

My analysis for the verses, is that male-to male relationships are leaving women without mates. In other words; homosexuality is destroying the natural cycle we know between men and women's mating.

It's not a genetic problem; isolate men in a place without mates for enough time, and they'll have sex with each other in no time. Prisons are known for that.

That's my opinion: homsexuality is extravagant in terms of sexuality, destructive too to the natural cycle that all of us resulted from.

Then comes number 2: which is ignorant people who are high in their pussy-loving, who just pose as historical dicks forcing constraints on minorities.

The sign said, "We Hire Happy People".

It's that kind of discrimination that keeps me unemployed.

[downbeatplumb]

 I saw no evidence let lone proof of biological evolution, and as for the Galapagos Islands to be isolated is a false statement. It has been recorded that main land birds have been flying there so that shoots down your isolated environment. That's just one example. No evidence exists that new information has ever been added to DNA and that of course means no new kinds.

GC

People who study biology support evolution because, lets be very plain here, evolution is an established fact.

Fact is often used by scientists to refer to experimental or empirical data or objective verifiable observations.[14][15] "Fact" is also used in a wider sense to mean any theory for which there is overwhelming evidence.[16]
A fact is a hypothesis that is so firmly supported by evidence that we assume it is true, and act as if it were true. —Douglas J. Futuyma[6]
In the sense that evolution is overwhelmingly validated by the evidence, it is a fact. It is frequently said to be a fact in the same way as the Earth's revolution around the Sun is a fact.[6][17] The following quotation from Hermann Joseph Muller's article, "One Hundred Years Without Darwinism Are Enough," explains the point.
There is no sharp line between speculation, hypothesis, theory, principle, and fact, but only a difference along a sliding scale, in the degree of probability of the idea. When we say a thing is a fact, then, we only mean that its probability is an extremely high one: so high that we are not bothered by doubt about it and are ready to act accordingly. Now in this use of the term fact, the only proper one, evolution is a fact.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_as_fact_and_theory

[Godscreated]

 I saw no evidence let lone proof of biological evolution, and as for the Galapagos Islands to be isolated is a false statement. It has been recorded that main land birds have been flying there so that shoots down your isolated environment. That's just one example. No evidence exists that new information has ever been added to DNA and that of course means no new kinds.

GC

People who study biology support evolution because, lets be very plain here, evolution is an established fact.

Fact is often used by scientists to refer to experimental or empirical data or objective verifiable observations.[14][15] "Fact" is also used in a wider sense to mean any theory for which there is overwhelming evidence.[16]
A fact is a hypothesis that is so firmly supported by evidence that we assume it is true, and act as if it were true. —Douglas J. Futuyma[6]
In the sense that evolution is overwhelmingly validated by the evidence, it is a fact. It is frequently said to be a fact in the same way as the Earth's revolution around the Sun is a fact.[6][17] The following quotation from Hermann Joseph Muller's article, "One Hundred Years Without Darwinism Are Enough," explains the point.
There is no sharp line between speculation, hypothesis, theory, principle, and fact, but only a difference along a sliding scale, in the degree of probability of the idea. When we say a thing is a fact, then, we only mean that its probability is an extremely high one: so high that we are not bothered by doubt about it and are ready to act accordingly. Now in this use of the term fact, the only proper one, evolution is a fact.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_as_fact_and_theory

 Just because self promoting scientist want to claim a thing doesn't mean it's true. Until someone proves new information can be added to DNA without the manipulation of man then evolution is dead and it will stay that way.

GC

[downbeatplumb]

 Just because self promoting scientist want to claim a thing doesn't mean it's true. Until someone proves new information can be added to DNA without the manipulation of man then evolution is dead and it will stay that way.

GC

Mutations you mean.

They happen all the time you have about 42 yourself everyone does.

http://statedclearly.com/articles/human-...eneration/

Reordering of genetic bases gives different information in the same way that re-arranging words gives new books.

So evolution very much alive.

[The Grand Nudger]

My analysis for the verses, is that male-to male relationships are leaving women without mates. In other words; homosexuality is destroying the natural cycle we know between men and women's mating.

Will no one think of Teh Ladiez!?!

The authors of magic book were predictably weirded out by the gay stuff (but probably not the lezzi stuff..you see...there's a difference.......).  That's the whole reason, grandiose fantasies-as-analysis aside.  

That's my opinion: homsexuality is extravagant in terms of sexuality, destructive too to the natural cycle that all of us resulted from.

Will no one think of Teh Cycle!?!

Then comes number 2: which is ignorant people who are high in their pussy-loving, who just pose as historical dicks forcing constraints on minorities.

It's all #2 in magic book, Atlas.  A big steaming pile of it, in fact. 

[Anomalocaris]

People who study biology support evolution because, lets be very plain here, evolution is an established fact.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_as_fact_and_theory

 Just because self promoting scientist want to claim a thing doesn't mean it's true. Until someone proves new information can be added to DNA without the manipulation of man then evolution is dead and it will stay that way.

GC

Information in this context doesn’t mean what you think it means, you gullible ignorant little man.

[Godscreated]

 Just because self promoting scientist want to claim a thing doesn't mean it's true. Until someone proves new information can be added to DNA without the manipulation of man then evolution is dead and it will stay that way.

GC

Information in this context doesn’t mean what you think it means, you gullible ignorant little man.

 I know exactly what it means, unlike you I've looked at both sides and found evolution lacking in truth and honesty.

GC

[Abaddon_ire]

My analysis for the verses, is that male-to male relationships are leaving women without mates. In other words; homosexuality is destroying the natural cycle we know between men and women's mating.

Will no one think of Teh Ladiez!?!

I am always thinking of Teh Ladiezs. My eldest is transgender. I lost a daughter and gained a son. Christians of every stripe want to butcher him/her and me for being supportive. My perspective is that they can all go die in a fire.