Yeah, but whatabout Osama bin Bama! Huh?



Show a man a graph, and he starts talking about the white houses dark years.

(December 26, 2017 at 4:24 pm)Drich Wrote: Same polls also reported that hillary would win by a land slide.

Unless Tom Hank runs in 20 you's all better start stretching you liberal bottoms out for 4 more years of us dragging you morons kicking nd screaming into prosperous lives.

Conservatives and Republicans giving us prosperous lives?? Now that is a hoot.

---

(December 26, 2017 at 4:48 pm)Crossless2.0 Wrote:

(December 26, 2017 at 4:41 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Go fuck yourself you anti-american asshole.

Drich is just another 'I-got-mine-so-go-fuck-yourselves'-style Christian. He doesn't give two shits about the body politic. It could all burn, as far as he's concerned. Just give him his tax cuts and let Jesus sort out the rest of the mess.

The worse things get, the "truer" their fucking prophesies seem to them.

That is what the Dominionist traitors are working towards. Their imaginary friend will come back with a little help from them.

(January 5, 2018 at 4:18 pm)Secular Elf Wrote:

(December 26, 2017 at 4:24 pm)Drich Wrote: Same polls also reported that hillary would win by a land slide.

Unless Tom Hank runs in 20 you's all better start stretching you liberal bottoms out for 4 more years of us dragging you morons kicking nd screaming into prosperous lives.

Conservatives and Republicans giving us prosperous lives??  Now that is a hoot.

They always harp on the times when the Republican presidents briefly lead to periods of prosperity, but never talk about how the aftermath ends up costing a hell of a lot in the long run, like the prosperous years of the Roaring Twenties which ultimately lead to the Great Depression and the New Dawn in America that came with Reagan that ultimately started  a chain of dominoes that finally collapsed in 2008. Or maybe the Eisenhower boom that existed because he knew that leaving the New Deal programs that FDR and Truman started alone was a good idea.

Trump is taking job growth down the hill

(January 6, 2018 at 9:24 am)Fake Messiah Wrote: Trump is taking job growth down the hill

Do you consider the quality of job growth numbers isn't just about the raw numbers, and could be tied to unemployment?  If you have high unemployment, you need big job growth numbers to get it to where you want it to be.  If you have record low unemployment, you only need enough job growth to maintain record low unemployment.  To come to the conclusion people are meant to come to, you'd have to believe that going from 8% to 5% unemployment is the same as going from 5% to 2%.  Or if you want to take it to the extreme to show how undeniably stupid it is, it would have to be the same as going from 2% to -1%, which isn't even possible that I'm aware of.

This is one of the dishonest things media does.  They put up a graph like this, and just let people draw their own shoddy conclusions.  It's the dihydrogen monoxide bit.  And it's used all the time.  They purposefully withhold implications to the facts they dole out because they know people don't have the ability to say "Hmm, this isn't enough information for someone with my knowledge to draw a conclusion."

(January 6, 2018 at 11:33 am)wallym Wrote:

(January 6, 2018 at 9:24 am)Fake Messiah Wrote: Trump is taking job growth down the hill

Do you consider the quality of job growth numbers isn't just about the raw numbers, and could be tied to unemployment?  If you have high unemployment, you need big job growth numbers to get it to where you want it to be.  If you have record low unemployment, you only need enough job growth to maintain record low unemployment.  To come to the conclusion people are meant to come to, you'd have to believe that going from 8% to 5% unemployment is the same as going from 5% to 2%.  Or if you want to take it to the extreme to show how undeniably stupid it is, it would have to be the same as going from 2% to -1%, which isn't even possible that I'm aware of.

So even when Trump is losing he's actually winning. Beside didn't Trump say that Obama was a disaster and especially Trumpists who repeat this over and over again like mantra and now when there was lower job growth during Trump's era they change their tune to "Well, economy wasn't that bad so there weren't many jobs needed."

(January 6, 2018 at 11:53 am)Fake Messiah Wrote:

(January 6, 2018 at 11:33 am)wallym Wrote: Do you consider the quality of job growth numbers isn't just about the raw numbers, and could be tied to unemployment?  If you have high unemployment, you need big job growth numbers to get it to where you want it to be.  If you have record low unemployment, you only need enough job growth to maintain record low unemployment.  To come to the conclusion people are meant to come to, you'd have to believe that going from 8% to 5% unemployment is the same as going from 5% to 2%.  Or if you want to take it to the extreme to show how undeniably stupid it is, it would have to be the same as going from 2% to -1%, which isn't even possible that I'm aware of.

So even when Trump is losing he's actually winning. Beside didn't Trump say that Obama was a disaster and especially Trumpists who repeat this over and over again like mantra and now when there was lower job growth during Trump's era they change their tune to "Well, economy wasn't that bad so there weren't many jobs needed."

I'm not saying anyone is winning or losing.  I'm saying your chart is stupid, and with a bit of critical thinking, you should be able to figure out why.

(January 6, 2018 at 12:04 pm)wallym Wrote:

(January 6, 2018 at 11:53 am)Fake Messiah Wrote: So even when Trump is losing he's actually winning. Beside didn't Trump say that Obama was a disaster and especially Trumpists who repeat this over and over again like mantra and now when there was lower job growth during Trump's era they change their tune to "Well, economy wasn't that bad so there weren't many jobs needed."

I'm not saying anyone is winning or losing.  I'm saying your chart is stupid, and with a bit of critical thinking, you should be able to figure out why.

So he couldn't create more jobs then "Muslim terrorist from Kenya" that was destroying US, which makes him, what, worst then a terrorist?

BTW my chart?!

(January 6, 2018 at 3:18 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote:

(January 6, 2018 at 12:04 pm)wallym Wrote: I'm not saying anyone is winning or losing.  I'm saying your chart is stupid, and with a bit of critical thinking, you should be able to figure out why.

So he couldn't create more jobs then "Muslim terrorist from Kenya" that was destroying US, which makes him, what, worst then a terrorist?

BTW my chart?!

Like I said.  A bit of critical thinking would be enough.  Alas, it was not meant to be.

(January 6, 2018 at 3:33 pm)wallym Wrote:

(January 6, 2018 at 3:18 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote: So he couldn't create more jobs then "Muslim terrorist from Kenya" that was destroying US, which makes him, what, worst then a terrorist?

BTW my chart?!

Like I said.  A bit of critical thinking would be enough.  Alas, it was not meant to be.

Hey man Trump called himself The America First Job Creating Savior President and yet he couldn't create more jobs then the terrorist.